Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential (mfVEP) and Pattern-Reversal Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Patients with Visual Pathway Disorders: A Case Series

REFERENCES

• Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:937–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenhardt L, Halliday A. Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform. Exp Brain Res 1979;36:53–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesia GG. Evoked potential techniques in the evaluation of visual function. J Clin Neurophysiol 1984;1:55–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celesia GG, Polcyn RD, Holden JE, Nickles RJ, Gatley JS, Koeppe RA. Visual evoked potentials and positron emission tomographic mapping of regional cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolism: can the neuronal potential generators be visualized? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:243–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKay DM, Jeffreys DA. Visually evoked potentials and visual perception in man. In: R Jung, editor. Visual Centers in the Brain. New York: Springer; 1973:647–678
   Google Scholar
• Grover LK, Hood DC, Ghadiali Q, Grippo TM, Wenick AS, Greenstein VC, Behrens MM, Odel JG. A comparison of multifocal and conventional visual evoked potential techniques in patients with optic neuritis/multiple sclerosis. Doc Ophthalmol 2008;117:121–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klistorner A, Graham SL, Martins A, Grigg JR, Arvind H, Kumar RS, James AC, Billson FA. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1613–1621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klistorner A, Graham S, Grigg J, Balachandran C. Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:739–744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesh-Meyer HV, Carroll SC, Gaskin BJ, Gao A, Gamble GD. Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1458–1463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe K, Shinoda K, Kimura I, Mashima Y, Oguchi Y, Ohde H. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:295–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman M, Ambika S, Gandhi RA, Bassi SR, Ravi P, Sen P. Multifocal visual evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy secondary to pituitary adenoma. Doc Ophthalmol 2010;121:197–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grippo TM, Hood DC, Kanadani FN, Ezon I, Greenstein VC, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. A comparison between multifocal and conventional VEP latency changes secondary to glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5331–5336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klistorner A, Fraser C, Garrick R, Graham S, Arvind H. Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 2008;116:19–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2010;120:111–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klistorner A, Arvind H, Nguyen T, Garrick R, Paine M, Graham S, O’Day J, Yiannikas C. Multifocal VEP and OCT in optic neuritis: a topographical study of the structure–function relationship. Doc Ophthalmol 2009;118:129–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvind H, Graham S, Leaney J, Grigg J, Goldberg I, Billson F, Klistorner A. Identifying preperimetric functional loss in glaucoma: a blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1134–1141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minniti G, Esposito V, Piccirilli M, Fratticci A, Santoro A, Jaffrain-Rea ML. Diagnosis and management of pituitary tumours in the elderly: a review based on personal experience and evidence of literature. Eur J Endocrinol 2005;153:723–735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder GE, Bullock PR. Visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with non-functioning chromophobe adenomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:31–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semela L, Yang EB, Hedges TR, Vuong L, Odel JG, Hood DC. Multifocal visual-evoked potential in unilateral compressive optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:445–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradnam MS, Montgomery D, Evans AL, Keating D, McClure EA, Damato BE, McFadzean R. Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:297–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biersdorf WR, Bell RA, Beck RW. Pattern flash visual evoked potentials in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;80:51–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimovic IC, Pedley TA. Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. II. Lesions of the chiasm and posterior visual pathways. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:121–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumhardt L, Barrett G, Kiss A, Halliday A. The pattern-evoked potential in lesions of the posterior visual pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;338:264–289
   Google Scholar
• Maitland CG, Aminoff MJ, Kennard C, Hoyt WF. Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions. Neurology 1982;32:986–986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadzean R, Brosnahan D, Hadley D, Mutlukan E. Representation of the visual field in the occipital striate cortex. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:185–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurita-Tashima S, Tobimatsu S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M, Kato M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;80:161–166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck RW, Cleary PA. Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial: one-year follow-up results. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:773–775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiannikas C, Walsh J. The variation of the pattern shift visual evoked response with the size of the stimulus field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983;55:427–435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ristanović D, Hajduković R. Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981;51:599–610
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balachandran C, Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 2003;106:183–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley G. The variability of the human striate cortex. J Physiol 1972;225:1P
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1580–1587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:2145–2152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ. The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuroophthalmol 2003;23:279–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerre A, Grigg JR, Parry NR, Henson DB. Test–retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:4035–4040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner SK, Demirel S. Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2008;115:2127–2131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar