References
- Wall M, Hart WM, Jr., Burde RM. Visual field defects in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96: 654–669
- Bulens C, De Vries WAEJ, Van Crevel H. Benign intracranial hypertension: a retrospective study. J Neurol Sci 1979; 40: 147–157
- Rush JA. Pseudotumor cerebri. Clinical profile and visual outcome in 63 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1980; 55: 541–546
- Corbett JJ, Savino PJ, Thompson HS, Kanzu T, Schatz NJ, Orr LS, Hopson D. Visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Follow-up of 57 patients from five to 41 years and a profile of 14 patients with permanent severe visual loss. Arch Neurol 1982; 39: 461–474
- Orcutt JC, Page NGR, Sanders MD. Factors affecting visual loss in benign intracranial hypertension. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 1303–1312
- Baker RS, Carter D, Hendrik EB, Buncic JR. Visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri of childhood. A follow-up study. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 1681–1686
- Smith TJ, Baker RS. Perimetric findings in pseudotumor cerebri using automated techniques. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 887–894
- Wall M, George D. Visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Incidence and defects related to visual field strategy. Arch Neurol 1987; 44: 170–175
- Wall M. Contrast sensitivity testing in pseudotumor cerebri. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 4–7
- Lorance RW, Kaufman D, Wray SH, Mao C. Contrast visual field testing in neurovisual diagnosis. Neurology 1987; 37: 923–929
- Bulens C, Meerwaldt JD, Koudstaal PJ, Van der Wildt GJ. Spatial contrast sensitivity in benign intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1988; 51: 1323–1329
- Verplanck M, Kaufman DI, Parsons T, Yedavally S, Kokinakis D. Electrophysiology versus psychophysics in the detection of visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology 1988; 38: 1789–1792
- Johnston 1, Paterson A. Benign intracranial hypertension. I. Diagnosis and prognosis. Brain 1974; 97: 289–300
- Ishihara S. Tests for Colour Blindness. 15th complete edn. Kanehara Shuppan Co Ltd. 1960
- Farnsworth D. The Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness. Panel DJ5. Psychological Corporation, New York 1947
- Lanthony P, Dubois-Poulsen A. Le Farnsworth 15 d&aturt. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr 1973; 73: 861–866
- Lanthony P. Evaluation du Panel D15 desature\ II: Comparaison entre les tests Panel D-15 desature et Farnsworth 100 Hue. J Fr Ophtalmol 1987; 10: 579–585
- Mauguiere F, Mitrou H, Chalet E, Pourcher E, Courjon J. Intlret des potentiels eVoquis visuels dans la sclerose mul-tiloculaire (S.M.). Etude comparative des resultats obtenus en stimulation par eclairs lumineux et inversion de damiers. Rev EEG Neurophysiol 1979; 9: 209–220
- Vernier F, Charlier J, Nguyen DD. Application of cathode-ray tube technology to the clinical evaluation of visual functions. Opt Engin 1988; 27: 123–128
- Miller NR. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins. 1982; Vol 1: 199–205
- Wessel K, Thron A, Linden A, Petersen D, Dichgans J. Pseudotumor cerebri: clinical and neuroradiologic findings. Eur Arch Psychiat Neurol Sci 1987; 237: 54–60
- Halpern JI, Gordon WH, Jr. Trochlear nerve palsy as a false localizing sign. Ann Ophthalmol 1981; 13: 53–56
- Miller NR. Walsh and Hoyt's Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins. 1985; Vol II: 687
- Sorensen PS, Trojaborg W, Gjerris F, Krogsaa B. Visual evoked potentials in pseudotumor cerebri. Arch Neurol 1985; 42: 150–153
- Hayreh SS. Optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure. VI. Associated visual disturbances and their pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95: 1566–1579
- Beck RW. Discussion of ref. Smith TJ, Baker RS. 1986; 7