Fixation behavior and reading ability in macular scotoma: Assessed by Tuebingen manual perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

References

• Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Teschner C, Tornow R P, Zrenner E. Reading strategies in normal subjects and in patients with macular scotomaassessed by two new methods of registration. Neuro-Ophthalmology 1994; 14: 15–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheim T. über die indirekte Sehschärfe. Z Psychol 1894; 7: 172–187
   Google Scholar
• Aulhorn E. über Fixationsbreite und Fixationsfrequenz beim Lesen gerichteter Konturen. Pflügers Arch Physiol 1953; 257: 318–328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Noorden G K, Mackensen G. Phenomenology of eccentric fixation. Am J Ophthalmol 1962; 53: 642–661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulhorn E. Die Beziehung zwischen Gesichtsfeldausfall und Lesefahigkeit bei Schwachsichtigen. Jahreshauptversammlung der Österreichischen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. Wien, Kongressprint 1962; 80–88
   Google Scholar
• Aulhorn E. Die Gesichtsfeldprüfung bei macularen Erkrankungen. Proceedings, Meeting of the Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft (DOG), Heidelberg, Ber. JF Bergmann, München 1975; 77–86, 73
   Google Scholar
• Webb R H, Hughes G W, Delori F. Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Appl Opt 1987; 26: 1492–1499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culham L E, Fitzke F W, Timberlake G T, Marshall J. The use of scrolled text in a scanning laser ophthalmoscope to assess reading performance at different retinal locations. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12: 281–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guez J-E., Le Gargasson J-F., Rigaudiere F, O'Regan J K. Is there a systematic location for the pseudo-fovea in patients with central scotoma?. Vision Res 1993; 33: 1271–1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard R A. Retinal locus for fixation: pericentral fixation targets. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 7: 511–520
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake G T, Mainster M A, Peli E, Essock E A, Augliere R A, Essock E A, Arend L E. Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 27: 1137–1147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timberlake G T, Peli E, Essock E A, Augliere R A. Reading with a macular scotoma. II. Retinal locus for scanning text. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 1268–1274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Teschner C, Tornow R P, Zrenner E. Die Bedeutung des zentralen Gesichtsfeldes für die Lesefähigkeit und Rehabilitation Sehbehinderter. Spektrum Augenheilkd 1994; 8: 128–134
   Google Scholar
• Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Tornow R P, Teschner C. Fixation behavior and reading in patients with macular scotoma-assessed by SLO and Tuebingen Manual Perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl) 1995; 36: 684
   Google Scholar
• Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Teschner C, Tornow R P, Durst W, Zrenner E. The reading process: a new approach to the sensory and motoric aspects. Videofilm, first presentation. 1st Meeting of the European Neuroophthalmological Society EUNOS. 1993
   Google Scholar
• Curcio C A, Sloan K R, Jr., Packert O, Hendrickson A E, Kalina R E. Distribution of cones in human monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 1987; 236: 579–582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry V H, Cowey A. The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors. Vision Res 1985; 25: 1795–1810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellemann D J, Van Essen D C. Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of Macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol 1987; 57: 889–920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skandries W, Baier M. The standing potential of the human eye reflects differences between upper and lower retinal areas. Vision Res 1986; 26: 579–581
   Google Scholar
• Miyake Y, Shiroyama N, Horiguchi M, Ota I. Asymmetry of focal ERG in human macular region. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 1743–1749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason R, White C, Oden D. Averaged occipital responses to stimulation of sites in the upper and lower halves of the retina. Percept Psychophys 1967; 2: 423–434
   Google Scholar
• Bartl G, Van Lith G HM, Van Marie G W. Cortical potentials evoked by TV pattern reversal stimulus varying check sizes and position of the stimulus field. Ophthalmic Res 1978; 10: 295–301
   Google Scholar
• Adachi-Usami E, Lehmann D. Monocular and binocular evoked average potential field topography: upper and lower hemiretinal stimuli. Exp Brain Res 1983; 50: 341
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouma H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Res 1973; 13: 767–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner K, Well A D, Pollatsek A. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Percept Psychophys 1980; 27: 537–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner K, Well A D, Pollatsek A, Bertera J H. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Percept Psychophys 1982; 31: 537–550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Regan J K, Jacobs A M. Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: a challenge to current theory. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1992; 18: 185–197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guez J-E., Le Gargasson J-F., Grail Y. Relation between reading and preferred retinal locus in patients with central scotoma. Eur J Ophthalmol Suppl 1995; 5: 29
   Google Scholar
• Culham L E, Fitzke F W, Timberlake G T, Marshall J. Assessment of fixation stability in normal subjects and patients using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Clin Vision Sci 1993; 8–551, 561
   Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Kruse F E, Fendrich T, Völcker H E. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Germ J Ophthalmol 1995; 4: 197–202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodrich G L, Mehr E B. Eccentric viewing training and low vision aids: current practice and implications of peripheral retinal research. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63: 119–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson U L, Nilsson S EG. Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol 1986; 62: 345–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen S J, Skavenski A A. Adaptation of saccades and fixation to bilateral foveal lesions in adult monkey. Vision Res 1992; 32: 365–373
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White J M, Bedell H E. The oculomotor reference in humans with bilateral macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 1149–1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker S G, Cummings R W. Saccade control without foveal function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (Suppl) 1988; 29: 135
   Google Scholar