Visual evoked potential abnormalities in compressive chiasmal lesions: the relevance of central visual field defects

References

• Halliday A M. The visual evoked potential in the investigation of chiasmal and retrochiasmal lesions, field defects and systemic diseases. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing, A M Halliday. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, Madrid, Melbourne, New York, Tokyo 1993; 279–357
   Google Scholar
• Halliday A M, Halliday E, Kriss A, McDonald W I, Mushin J. The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain 1976; 99: 357–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gott P S, Weiss M H, Apuzzo M, Van derMeulen J P. Checkerboard visual evoked response in evaluation and management of pituitary tumours. Neurosurgery 1979; 5: 553–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J G, Harding G FA. Multichannel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the chiasm. Doc Ophthalmol 1988; 69: 271–281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder G E, Bullock P R. Visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with non-functioning chromophobe adenomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1989; 52: 31–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecelj J., Strucl M, Skrbec M. Visual evoked potentials in compressive lesions of the optic chiasm. Neuro-Ophthalmology 1992; 12: 207–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumhardt L D, Barrett G, Halliday A M. The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61: 454–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumhardt L D, Halliday A M. Hemisphere contribution to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform. Exp Brain Res 1979; 36: 53–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumhardt L D, Barrett G, Kriss A, Halliday A M. The pattern-evoked potential in lesions of the posterior visual pathways. Ann NY Acad Sci 1982; 388: 264–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartl G, Benedikt O, Hiti H, Mandl H. Cortical potentials evoked by a TV pattern reversal stimulus with varying check size and stimulus field. Br J Ophthalmol 1978; 62: 216–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meredith J T, Celesia G G. Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity. Electroencepha-logrClin Neurophysiol 1982; 53: 243–253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumhardt L D, Barrett G, Halliday A M, Kriss A. The effect of field size on the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PRVER). Clin Vision Sci 1989; 4: 27–40
   Google Scholar
• Strucl M. Electrophysiological basis of diagnostics at different levels of the visual system. Neurologija 1990; 39(Suppl)203–210, 0
   Google Scholar
• Junghardt A, Wildberger H, Robert Y, Török B. Pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential amplitudes are influenced by different stimulus field sizes and scotomata. Doc Ophthalmol 1993; 83: 139–149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumhardt L D. The abnormal pattern visual evoked response in neurology. A Textbook of Clinical Neurophysiology, A M Halliday, S R Butler, R Paul. Wiley, Chichester 1987; 307–342
   Google Scholar
• Holder G E. Chiasmal and retrochiasmal lesions. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, J R Heckenlively, G B Arden. Mosby Year Book, Chicago, IL 1991; 557–564
   Google Scholar
• Onofrj M. Generators of pattern visual evoked potentials in normals and patients with retrochiasmatic lesions. Visual Evoked Potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology Updates, J E Desmedt. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1990; 3: 87–113
   Google Scholar
• Hollenhorst R W, Younge B R. Ocular manifestation produced by adenomas of the pituitary gland: analysis of 1000 cases. Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Tumours, P O Kohler, G T Ross. Elsevier, Excerpta Medica-American, New York 1973; 53–64
   Google Scholar
• Brecelj J. A VEP study of the visual pathway function in compressive lesions of the optic chiasm. Full-field versus half-field stimulation. Electro- encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 209–218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards L, Drasdo N. Scalp distribution of visual evoked potentials to foveal pattern and luminance stimuli. Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 66: 301–311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schein S J. Anatomy of macaque fovea and spatial densities of neurons in foveal representation. J Comp Neurol 1988; 269: 479–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadzean R, Brosnahan D, Hadley D, Mutlukan E. Representation of the visual field in the occipital striate cortex. Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 185–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley H A, Addicks E M. Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1982; 1000: 807–881
   Google Scholar
• Brecelj J. Electrodiagnostics of chiasmal compressive lesions. Int J Psychophysiol 1994; 16: 263–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumhardt L D, Barrett G, Halliday A M, Kriss A. The effect of experimental ‘scotomata’ on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern reversal in one half-field. Electro-encephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 45: 376–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumhardt L D. Variable effects of pathologic scotomata on wave form of pattern-reversal visual evoked response. Doc Ophthalmol 1985; 59: 107–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukui R, Kato M, Kuroiwa Y. Effect of central scotomata on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with maculopathy and healthy subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 63: 317–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecelj J, Strucl M, Hawlina M. Central fibre contribution to W-shaped visual evoked potentials in patients with optic neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 75: 155–163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halliday A M. The visual evoked potential in the investigation of the disease of the optic nerve. Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing, A M Halliday. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, Madrid, Melbourne, New York, Tokyo 1993; 195–278
   Google Scholar
• Kriss A., Carroll W M, Biumhardt L D, Halliday A M. Pattern- and flash-evoked potential changes in toxic (nutritional) optic neuropathy. Clinical Applications of Evoked Potentials in Neurology, J Courjon, F Mauguiere, M Revol. Raven Press, New York 1982; 11–19
   Google Scholar
• Brecelj J, Prevec T S. Study of foveal and peripheral visual responses evoked by pattern-reversal stimulation. Evoked Potentials II, R H Nodar, C Barber. Butterworths, Stoneham 1984; 280–286
   Google Scholar
• Brecelj J, Cunningham K. Occipital distribution of foveal half-field responses. Doc Ophthalmol 1985; 59: 157–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harding G FA. Origin of visual evoked cortical potentials components. Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, J R Heckenlively, G B Arden. Mosby Year Book, Chicago, IL 1991; 132–144
   Google Scholar
• Cannavo S, De Natale R, Curto L, Li Calzi L, Trimarchi F. Effectiveness of computer-assisted perimetry in the follow-up of patients with pituitary microadenoma responsive to medical treatment. Clin Endocrinol 1992; 37: 157–161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grochowicki M, Vighetto A., Berquet S, Khalfallah Y, Sassolas G. Pituitary adenomas: automatic static perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. A comparative study of 345 visual field charts. Br J Ophthalmol 1991; 75: 219–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brecelj J., Kriss A. Patternreversal VEPs in optic neuritis. Advantages of central and peripheral half-field stimulation. Neuro-Ophthalmology 1989; 9: 55–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar