Qualitative research as the basis for a biopsychosocial approach to women with chronic pelvic pain

References

• ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Chronic Pelvic Pain. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:589–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASP. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl 1986;3:1–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IASP. Chronic Pelvic and Urogenital Pain Syndromes. Pain Clinical Updates 2008;41:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zondervan K, Barlow DH. Epidemiology of chronic pelvic pain. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000;14:403–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006;6:177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace V, Zondervan K. Chronic pelvic pain in women in New Zealand: comparative well-being, comorbidity, and impact on work and other activities. Health Care Women Int 2006;27:585–599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weijenborg PT, Greeven A, Dekker FW, Peters AA, Ter Kuile MM. Clinical course of chronic pelvic pain in women. Pain 2007;132 Suppl 1:S117–S123.
   Google Scholar
• Weijenborg PT, Ter Kuile MM, Gopie JP, Spinhoven P. Predictors of outcome in a cohort of women with chronic pelvic pain - a follow-up study. Eur J Pain 2009;13:769–775.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCollum L, Pincus T. A biopsychosocial model to complement a biomedical model: patient questionnaire data and socioeconomic status usually are more significant than laboratory tests and imaging studies in prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2009;35:699–712 v.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minayo MC. O desafio do conhecimento: pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. 11th ed. São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro: Hucitec-Abrasco; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Turato ER. Introduction to the clinical qualitative research methodology: definitions and main characteristics. Rev Portug Psicossomática 2000;2:93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Turato ER. [Qualitative and quantitative methods in health: definitions, differences and research subjects]. Rev Saude Publica 2005;39:507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowther M, Lim W, Crowther MA. Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Blood 2010;116:3140–3146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 2003;13:905–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck CT. Metasynthesis: a goldmine for evidence-based practice. AORN J 2009;90:701–2–705.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson B, Lindquist I. Metasynthesis of qualitative inquiry research studies in physiotherapy. Physiother Res Int 2010;15:111–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G, Sandelowski M. Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qual Health Res 2004;14:1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace VM. Problems women patients experience in the medical encounter for chronic pelvic pain: a New Zealand study. Health Care Women Int 1995;16:509–519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zadinsky JK, Boyle JS. Experiences of women with chronic pelvic pain. Health Care Women Int 1996;17:223–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savidge C, Slade P, Stewart P, TL, . Women’s perspectives on their experiences of chronic pelvic pain and medical care. J Health Psychol 1998;3:103–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salmon P, Peters S, Stanley I. Patients’ perceptions of medical explanations for somatisation disorders: qualitative analysis. BMJ 1999;318:372–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert H. Psychosomatic group treatment helps women with chronic pelvic pain. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1999;20:216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J, Ziebland S, Kennedy S. “People sometimes react funny if they’re not told enough”: women’s views about the risks of diagnostic laparoscopy. Health Expect 2002;5:302–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price J, Farmer G, Harris J, Hope T, Kennedy S, Mayou R. Attitudes of women with chronic pelvic pain to the gynaecological consultation: a qualitative study. BJOG 2006;113:446–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J. What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2006;86:1296–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strzempko Butt F, Chesla C. Relational patterns of couples living with chronic pelvic pain from endometriosis. Qual Health Res 2007;17:571–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan L, Luker K, Creed F, Chew-Graham CA. How do you explain a pain that can’t be seen?: the narratives of women with chronic pelvic pain and their disengagement with the diagnostic cycle. Br J Health Psychol 2007;12:261–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny E, Mann CH. Endometriosis-associated dyspareunia: the impact on women’s lives. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2007;33:189–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace VM, MacBride-Stewart S. “How to say it”: women’s descriptions of pelvic pain. Women Health 2007;46:81–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skuladottir H, Halldorsdottir S. Women in chronic pain: sense of control and encounters with health professionals. Qual Health Res 2008;18:891–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny E, Mann CH. Endometriosis and the primary care consultation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;139:111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderson L, Warren N, Markovic M. Circuit breaking: pathways of treatment seeking for women with endometriosis in Australia. Qual Health Res 2008;18:522–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conboy L, Quilty MT, Kerr C, Shaw J, Wayne P. A qualitative analysis of adolescents’ experiences of active and sham Japanese-style acupuncture protocols administered in a clinical trial. J Altern Complement Med 2008;14:699–705.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grace VM, MacBride-Stewart S. ‘Women get this’: gendered meanings of chronic pelvic pain. Health (London) 2007;11:47–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995 41:1403–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigerist HE. The special position of sick. In: Roemer, MI, Henry E, Sigerist on the Sociology of Medicine. New York; 1960, pp 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kurita GP, Pimenta CA. [Compliance with chronic pain treatment: study of demographic, therapeutic and psychosocial variables]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003;61:416–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalia LV, O’Connor PW. Severity of chronic pain and its relationship to quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005;11:322–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Pallant J. Chronic pain in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, characteristics, and impact on quality of life in an Australian community cohort. J Pain 2007;8:614–623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seger LO. Psicologia aplicada à disfunção da articulação temporomandibular. In: Santos , editor. Psicologia e Odontologia: Uma abordagem integradora. São Paulo; 2002. pp 203–242.
   Google Scholar
• Bondas T, Hall EO. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 2007;17:113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albino JEN. A psychologist’s guide to oral diseases and disorders and their treatment. Prof Psychol Res Practice 2002;33:176–182.
   Google Scholar
• Matta AZ, Muller MC. A qualitative analysis of living with endometriosis. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças 2006;7:57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Silva LD, Pazos AL. The influence of pain in the quality of life of patients with chronical skin injury. Revista de Enfermagem da Universidade Estadual do Rio de janeiro 2005;13:375–381.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso GP, Arruda A. Social representations of seropositivity and treatment adherence. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 2005;10:151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Barros JA. Considering the health-diesease process: What does the biomedical model answer to? Saúde e Sociedade 2002;11:67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Flores AMN, Costa Junior ÁL,. Modelo biopsicossocial e formulação comportamental: compreendendo a cefaléia do tipo tensional. Psicologia em Estudo 2008;13:143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Koifman L. [The biomedical model and the reformulation of the medical curriculum of Universidade Federal Fluminense]. Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos 2001;8:48–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minayo MC. [Anthropological approach to the evaluation of social policies]. Rev Saude Publica 1991;25:233–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porto MAT. Blood circulation, or the movement in the concept of motion. Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos 1994;1:19–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Todd AD. Intimate Adversaries: Cultural Conflict Between Doctors and Women Patients. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:955.
   Google Scholar
• Deslandes SF. Análise do discurso oficial sobre a humanização da assistência hospitalar. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2004;9:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Strey MN, Cabeda STLO. Corpo, Gênero e Saúde: A contribuição da antropologia. In: Corpos e subjetividades em exercício interdisciplinar. 3th ed. Porto Alegre:edipucrs; 2004. pp 81–106.
   Google Scholar