Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound-mediated gene transfer – Towards the development of targeted gene therapy for cancer

References

• Mingozzi F, High KA. Therapeutic in vivo gene transfer for genetic disease using AAV: Progress and challenges. Nature Rev Gen 2011; 12: 341–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Garrigue A, Wang GP, Soulier J, Lim A, Morillon E, et al. Insertional oncogenesis in 4 patients after retrovirus-mediated gene therapy of SCID-X1. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3123–3142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P, et al. LOM2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science 2003; 302: 415–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre FM, Mir LM. Nucleic acids electrotransfer in vivo: Mechanisms and practical aspects. Curr Gene Ther 2010; 10: 267–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cemazar M, Jarm T, Sersa G. Cancer electrogene therapy with interleukin-12. Curr Gene Ther 2010; 10: 300–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller LC, Heller R. Electroporation gene therapy preclinical and clinical trials for melanoma. Curr Gene Ther 2010; 10: 312–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodles-Brakhop AM, Heller R, Draghlia-Akli R. Electroporation for the delivery of DNA-based vaccines and immunotherapeutics: Current clinical developments. Mol Ther 2009; 17: 585–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davalos RV, Otten DM, Mir LM, Rubinsky B. Electrical impedance tomography for imaging tissue electroporation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004; 51: 761–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussios CC, Farny CH, ter Haar G, Roy RA. Role of acoustic cavitation in the delivery and monitoring of cancer treatment by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Int J Hyperthermia 2007; 23: 105–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K. Hyperthermia classical commentary. Int J Hyperthermia 2010; 26: 12–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzet S, Murat FJ, Pasticier G, Cassier P, Chapelon JY, Gelet A. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for prostate cancer: Current clinical status, outcomes and future perspectives. Int J Hyperthermia 2010; 26: 796–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale AP, Nomikou N, Brain tumours: Preclinical assessment of targeted, site-specific therapy exploiting ultrasound and cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. In: Hayat MA, eds. Tumours of the Central Nervous System, Volume 4. Springer Science+Business Media, 2012, pp. 313–322
   Google Scholar
• Platts DG, Fraser JF. Contrast echocardiography in critical care: Echoes of the future? A review of the role of microsphere contrast echocardiography. Crit Care Resusc 2011; 13: 44–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove D, Lassau N. Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: S65–S85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pysz MA, Foygel K, Panje SM, Needles A, Tian L, Willmann JK. Assessment and monitoring tumor vascularity with contrast-enhanced ultrasound maximum intensity persistence imaging. Invest Radiol 2011; 46: 187–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandai M, Koda M, Matono T, Nagahara T, Sugihara T, Ueki M, et al. Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with perfluorobutane microbubbles: Comparison with dynamic CT. Brit J Radiol 2011; 84: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Diaz de la Rosa MA, Richardson ES, Christensen DA, Pitt WG. The role of cavitation in acoustically activated drug delivery. J Control Release 2005; 107: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suslick KS. Sonochemistry. Science 1990; 23: 1439–1445
   Google Scholar
• Nejad SM, Hamid S, Hosseini R, Akiyama H, Tachibana K. Optical observation of cell sonoporation with low intensity ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2011; 413: 218–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayman AA, Coppage ML, Vaidya S, Miller MW. Transient poration and cell surface receptor removal from human lymphocytes in vitro by 1 MHz ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 999–1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MW. Gene transfection and drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: S59–S62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin S, Caskey CF, Ferrara KW. Ultrasound contrast microbubbles in imaging and therapy: Physical principles and engineering. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: R27–R57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter TR, Iversen PL, Li S, Xie F. Interaction of diagnostic ultrasound with synthetic oligonucleotide-labelled perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 577–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger EC, Hersh E, Vannan M, McCreery T. Gene delivery using ultrasound contrast agents. Echocardiography 2001; 18: 355–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomikou N, McHale AP. Exploiting ultrasound-mediated effects in delivery targeted, site-specific cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 2010; 296: 133–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomikou N, Tiwari P, Trehan T, Gulati K, McHale AP, Studies on neutral, cationic and biotinylated cationic microbubbles in enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater 2011;8:1273–1280
   Google Scholar
• Houk BE, Hochhaus G, Hughes JA. Kinetic modeling of plasmid DNA degradation in rat plasma. AAPS Pharmsci 1999; 1: 1–6
   Google Scholar
• Sboros V. Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2008; 60: 1117–1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheyn D, Kimelman-Bleich N, Pelled G, Zilberman Y, Gazit D, Gazit Z. Ultrasound-based nonviral gene delivery induces bone formation in vivo. Gene Ther 2008; 15: 257–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon JC, Mcfarland RJ, Rybicka JM, Balce DR, McKeown KR, Krohn RM, et al. In vitro and in vivo transfection of primary phagocytes via microbubble-mediated intraphagosomal sonoporation. J Immunol Methods 2011; 31: 152–158
   Google Scholar
• Sakai T, Kawaquchi M, Kosuge Y. siRNA-mediated gene silencing in the salivary gland using in vivo microbubble-enhanced sonoporation. Oral Dis 2009; 15: 505–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawalczuk L, Boudinet M, El Sanharawi M, Touchard E, Naud MC, Saied A, et al. In vivo gene transfer into the ocular ciliary muscle mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 1814–1827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter J, Sennoga CA, Lopes DM, Eckersley RJ, Wells DJ. Microbubble stability is a major determinant of the efficiency of ultrasound and microbubble mediated in vivo gene transfer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35: 976–984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon CS, Jung HS, Kwon MJ, Lee SH, Jim CW, Kim MK, et al. Sonoporation of the minicircle-VEGF (165) for wound healing of diabetic mice. Pharm Res 2009; 26: 794–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Namba T, Yamasaki K, Hashiya N, et al. Local delivery of plasmid DNA into rat carotid artery using ultrasound. Circulation 2002; 105: 1233–1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohta S, Suzuki K, Tachibana K, Yamada G. Microbubble-enhanced sonoporation: Efficient gene transduction technique for chick embryos. Genesis 2003; 37: 91–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar VM, Correia IJ, Sousa A, Silva F, Paquete CA, Queiroz JA, Sousa F, Nanoparticle mediated delivery of pure p53 supercoiled plasmid DNA for gene therapy. J Control Release 2011;156:212–222
   Google Scholar
• Zhang YA, Nemunaitis J, Samuel SK, Chen P, Shen Y, Tong AW. Antitumour activity of an oncolytic adenovirus-delivered oncogene small interfering RNA. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 9736–9743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won YW, Kim KM, An SS, Lee M, Ha Y, Kim YH. Suicide gene therapy using reducible poly (oligo-D-arginine) for the treatment of spinal cord tumors. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 9766–9755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Lee AD, Li S. IL-12 and IL-27 sequential gene therapy via intramuscular electroporation delivery for eliminating distal aggressive tumors. J Immunol 2010; 184: 2348–2354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belur LR, Podetz-Pedersen KM, Sorenson B, Hsu AH, Parker JB, Carlson CS, et al. Inhibition of angiogenesis and suppression of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system. Molecular Cancer 2011; 10: 14–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi K, Feril LB, Tachibana K, Takahashi A, Matsuo M, Endo H, et al. Ultrasound-mediated interferon β gene transfection inhibits growth of malignant melanoma. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2011; 411: 137–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai KC, Liao ZH, Lin WL, Shieh MJ, Hwang LH, Chen WS. Antiangiogenic gene therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma using endostatin. Biomed Eng 2011; 22: 71–79
   Google Scholar
• Li YS, Davidson E, Reid CN, McHale AP. Optimising ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in vitro and prolonged expression of a transgene in vivo: Potential applications for gene therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett 2009; 273: 62–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Namai E, Oda Y, Nishiie N, Otake S, Koshima R, et al. Cancer gene therapy by IL-12 gene delivery using liposomal bubbles and tumoural ultrasound exposure. J Control Release 2010; 142: 245–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson AR, McTiernan CF, Lavery L, Hodnick A, Grata M, Leng X, et al. Gene therapy of carcinoma using ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 393–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, Utoguchi N, Sawamura K, Tanaka K, et al. Tumour specific ultrasound enhanced gene transfer in vivo with novel liposomal bubbles. J Control Release 2008; 125: 137–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZY, Liang J, Qiu RX. Targeted gene delivery in tumor zenografts by the combination of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction and polyethylenimine to inhibit surviving gene expression and induce apoptosis. J Exp Clin Can Res 2010; 29: 152–161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirsi SR, Hernandez SL, Zielinski L, Blomback H, Koubaa A, Synder M, et al. Polyplex-microbubble hybrids for ultrasound-guided plasmid DNA delivery to solid tumors. J Control Release 2012;157:224–234
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Liu Y, Ying H, Xue Y, Zhang Z, Wang P, et al. Increasing of blood–tumour barrier permeability through paracellular pathway by low frequency ultrasound irradiation in vitro. J Mol Neurosci 2011; 43: 541–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainov NG. A phase III clinical evalulation of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase and ganciclovir gene therapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection and radiation in adults with previously untreated glioblastoma multiforme. Human Gene Ther 2000; 11: 2389–2401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furgeson DY, Yockman JW, Janat MM, Kim SW. Tumor efficacy and biodistribution of linear polyethylenimine-cholesterol/DNA complexes. Mol Ther 2004; 9: 837–845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kircheis R, Schuller S, Brunner S, Ogris M, Heider KH, Zauner W, Wagner E. Polycation-based DNA complexes for tumor-targeted gene delivery in vivo. J Gene Med 1999; 1: 111–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borden MA, Caskey CF, Little E, Gillies RJ, Ferrara KW. DNA and polylysine adsorption and multilayer construction onto cationic lipid-coated microbubbles. Langmuir 2007; 23: 9401–9408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haag P, Frauscher F, Gradl J, Seitz A, Schafer G, Lindner JR, et al. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound to deliver an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeting the human androgen receptor into prostate tumours. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2006; 102: 103–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci F, Corti A, How to improve exposure of tumor cells to drugs – Promoter drugs increase tumor uptake and penetration of effector drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2011; in press
   Google Scholar
• Bekeredjian R, Kroll RD, Fein E, Tinkov S, Coester C, Winter G, et al. Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction increases capillary permeability in hepatomas. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 1592–1598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohmer MR, Chlon CHT, Raju BI, Chin CT, Shevchenko T, Klibanov AL. Focused ultrasound and microbubbles for enhanced extravasation. J Control Release 2010; 148: 18–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomikou N, Li YS, McHale AP. Ultrasound-enhanced drug dispersion through solid tumours and its possible role in aiding ultrasound-targeted cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Lett 2010; 288: 94–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horie S, Watanabe Y, Ono M, Mori S, Kodama T. Evaluation of antitumor effects following tumor necrosis factor-α gene delivery using nanobubbles and ultrasound. Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 2082–2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport NY, Kennedy AM, Shea JE, Scaife CL, Nan KH. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J Control Release 2009; 268–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar