Ultrasound-mediated micellar drug delivery

References

• Iyer AK, Khaled G, Fang J, Maeda H. Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. Drug Discov Today 2006; 11: 812–818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell RB. Tumor physiology and delivery of nanopharmaceuticals. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2006; 6: 503–512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobbs SK, Monsky WL, Yuan F, Roberts WG, Griffith L, Torchilin VP, et al. Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: Role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 4607–4612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Nakamura H, Maeda H. The EPR effect: Unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2011; 63: 136–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner M, Ring TA, Rapoport N, Caldwell KD. Fibrinogen adsorption by PS latex particles coated with various amounts of a PEO/PPO/PEO triblock copolymer. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2002; 13: 733–746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JS, Butterfield DE, Voycheck CL, Caldwell KD, Li JT. Surface modification of nanoparticles by PEO/PPO block copolymers to minimize interactions with blood components and prolong blood circulation in rats. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 823–833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg L. Polymeric micelles in oral chemotherapy. J Control Release 2008; 128: 99–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappetta DA, Sosnik A. Poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide) block copolymer micelles as drug delivery agents: Improved hydrosolubility, stability and bioavailability of drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2007; 66: 303–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaucher G, Dufresne MH, Sant VP, Kang N, Maysinger D, Leroux JC. Block copolymer micelles: Preparation, characterization and application in drug delivery. J Control Release 2005; 109: 169–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaucher G, Marchessault RH, Leroux JC. Polyester-based micelles and nanoparticles for the parenteral delivery of taxanes. J Control Release 2010; 143: 2–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabanov AV, Alakhov VY. Pluronic block copolymers in drug delivery: From micellar nanocontainers to biological response modifiers. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2002; 19: 1–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakizawa Y, Kataoka K. Block copolymer micelles for delivery of gene and related compounds. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002; 54: 203–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001; 47: 113–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar U, Phutane P, Shidhaye S, Kadam V. Advances in polymeric micelles for drug delivery and tumor targeting. Nanomedicine 2010; 6: 714–729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavasanifar A, Samuel J, Kwon GS. Poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(L-amino acid) micelles for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002; 54: 169–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhail AS, Allen C. Block copolymer micelles for delivery of cancer therapy: Transport at the whole body, tissue and cellular levels. J Control Release 2009; 138: 214–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiyama N, Kataoka K. Current state, achievements, and future prospects of polymeric micelles as nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. Pharmacol Ther 2006; 112: 630–648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osada K, Christie RJ, Kataoka K. Polymeric micelles from poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(amino acid) block copolymer for drug and gene delivery. J R Soc Interface 2009; 6S3: S325–339
   Google Scholar
• Savic R, Eisenberg A, Maysinger D. Block copolymer micelles as delivery vehicles of hydrophobic drugs: Micelle-cell interactions. J Drug Target 2006; 14: 343–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Liu J, Liu M, Xie C, Zhan C, Gu B, et al. 9-NC-loaded folate-conjugated polymer micelles as tumor targeted drug delivery system: Preparation and evaluation in vitro. Int J Pharm 2009; 372: 125–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchilin VP. Targeted polymeric micelles for delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004; 61: 2549–2559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchilin VP, Lukyanov AN, Gao Z, Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg B. Immunomicelles: Ttargeted pharmaceutical carriers for poorly soluble drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 6039–6044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anti-cancer drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2007; 32: 962–990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N. Stabilization and acoustic activation of Pluronic micelles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 1999; 3: 93–111
   Google Scholar
• Luo S, Xu J, Zhu Z, Wu C, Liu S. Phase transition behavior of unimolecular micelles with thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) coronas. J Phys Chem B Condens Matter Mater Surf Interfaces Biophys 2006; 110: 9132–9139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacucina G, Cespi M, Mencarelli G, Giorgioni G, Palmieri F. Thermosensitive self-assembling block copolymers as drug delivery systems. Polymers 2011; 3: 779–811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letchford K, Zastre J, Liggins R, Burt H. Synthesis and micellar characterization of short block length methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(caprolactone) diblock copolymers. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2004; 35: 81–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandridis P, Holzwarth JF, Hatton TA. Micellization of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymers in aqueous solutions: Thermodynamics of copolymer association. Macromolecules 1994; 27: 2414–2425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandridis P, Nivaggioli T, Hatton TA. Temperature effects on structural properties of Pluronic P104 and F108 PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer solutions. Langmuir 1995; 11: 1468–1476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai X, Merdant T, Schaper A, Xi F, Kissel T. Core-cross-linked polymeric micelles as paclitaxel carriers. Bioconj Chem 2004; 15: 441–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura Y, Gotoh M, Muro K, Yamada Y, Shirao K, Shimada Y, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of MCC-465, a doxorubicin (DXR) encapsulated in PEG immunoliposome, in patients with metastatic stomach cancer. Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 517–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura Y, Hamaguchi T, Ura T, Muro K, Yamada Y, Shimada Y, et al. Phase I clinical trial and pharmacokinetic evaluation of NK911, a micelle-encapsulated doxorubicin. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 1775–1781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danson S, Ferry D, Alakhov V, Margison J, Kerr D, Jowle D, et al. Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of pluronic polymer-bound doxorubicin (SP1049C) in patients with advanced cancer. Br J Cancer 2004; 90: 2085–2091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Kim DW, Chung JY, Shin SG, Kim SC, Heo DS, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Genexol-PM, a Cremophor-free, polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 3708–3716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier E, Dufresne MH, Smith DC, Ranger M, Leroux JC. A novel one-step drug-loading procedure for water-soluble amphiphilic nanocarriers. Pharm Res 2004; 21: 962–968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Garrec D, Gori S, Luo L, Lessard D, Smith D, Yessine Mea. Poly(n-vinylpyrrolidone)-block-poly(d,l-lactide) as a new polymeric solubilizer for hydrophobic anticancer drugs: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Control Release 2004; 99: 83–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaguchi T, Matsumura Y, Suzuki M, Shimizu K, Goda R, Nakamura I, et al. NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation, can extend in vivo antitumour activity and reduce the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 1240–1246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SC, Kim DW, Shim YH, Bang JS, Oh HS, Wan Kim S, et al. In vivo evaluation of polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation: Toxicity and efficacy. J Control Release 2001; 72: 191–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DW, Kim SY, Kim HK, Kim SW, Shin SW, Kim JS, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a novel Cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18: 2009–2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JG, Sohn SK, Song HS, Kwon KY, Do YR, Lee KH, et al. Multicenter phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007; 60: 863–869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KS, Chung HC, Im SA, Park YH, Kim CS, Kim SB, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a Cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 108: 241–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saif MW, Podoltsev NA, Rubin MS, Figueroa JA, Lee MY, Kwon J, et al. Phase II clinical trial of paclitaxel loaded polymeric micelle in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Invest 2010; 28: 186–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce AM, Vujaskovic Z, Yuan F, Needham D, Dewhirst MW. Hyperthermia mediated liposomal drug delivery. Int J Hyperthermia 2006; 22: 205–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong G, Dewhirst MW. Hyperthermia and liposomes. Int J Hyperthermia 1999; 15: 345–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhirst MW, Vujaskovic Z, Jones E, Thrall D. Re-setting the biologic rationale for thermal therapy. Int J Hyperthermia 2005; 21: 779–790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmolenko PS, Moon EJ, Landon C, Manzoor A, Hochman DW, Viglianti BL, et al. Thresholds for thermal damage to normal tissues: An update. Int J Hyperthermia 2011; 27: 320–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujaskovic Z, Kim DW, Jones E, Lan L, McCall L, Dewhirst MW, et al. A phase I/II study of neoadjuvant liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and hyperthermia in locally advanced breast cancer. Int J Hyperthermia 2010; 26: 514–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmolenko PS, Zhao Y, Landon C, Spasojevic I, Yuan F, Needham D, et al. Comparative effects of thermosensitive doxorubicin-containing liposomes and hyperthermia in human and murine tumours. Int J Hyperthermia 2010; 26: 485–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaber MH, Wu NZ, Hong K, Huang SK, Dewhirst MW, Papahadjopoulos D. Thermosensitive liposomes: Extravasation and release of contents in tumor microvascular networks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 36: 1177–1187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck ML, Coffin DO, Dodge RK, Dewhirst MW, Mitchell JB, Zalutsky MR. A local hyperthermia treatment which enhances antibody uptake in a glioma xenograft model does not affect tumour interstitial fluid pressure. Int J Hyperthermia 1997; 13: 307–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck ML, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Zalutsky MR. Local hyperthermia improves uptake of a chimeric monoclonal antibody in a subcutaneous xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res 1997; 3: 63–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong G, Anyarambhatla G, Petros WP, Braun RD, Colvin OM, Needham D, et al. Efficacy of liposomes and hyperthermia in a human tumor xenograft model: Importance of triggered drug release. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 6950–6957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong G, Braun RD, Dewhirst MW. Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: Effect of particle size. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 4440–4445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham D, Anyarambhatla G, Kong G, Dewhirst MW. A new temperature-sensitive liposome for use with mild hyperthermia: Characterization and testing in a human tumor xenograft model. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 1197–1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neradovic D, Soga O, Van Nostrum CF, Hennink WE. The effect of the processing and formulation parameters on the size of nanoparticles based on block copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) with and without hydrolytically sensitive groups. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2409–2418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Zhang XZ, Cheng H, Chen WQ, Cheng SX, Zhuo RX. Self-assembled thermo- and pH responsive micelles of poly(10-undecenoic acid-b-N-isopropylacrylamide) for drug delivery. J Control Release 2006; 116: 266–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Zhang X, Cheng C, Cheng SX, Zhuo RX. Self-assembled, thermosensitive micelles of a star block copolymer based on PMMA and PNIPAAm for controlled drug delivery. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 99–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Zhang XZ, Zhou Y, Cheng SX, Zhuo RX. Self-assembled thermoresponsive micelles of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-b-methyl methacrylate). Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2028–2034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama M, Okano T, Miyazaki T, Kohori F, Sakai K, Yokoyama M. Molecular design of biodegradable polymeric micelles for temperature-responsive drug release. J Control Release 2006; 115: 46–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soga O, van Nostrum CF, Hennink WE. Thermosensitive and biodegradable polymeric micelles with transient stability. J Control Release 2005; 101: 383–385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soga O, van Nostrum CF, Fens M, Rijcken CJ, Schiffelers RM, Storm G, et al. Thermosensitive and biodegradable polymeric micelles for paclitaxel delivery. J Control Release 2005; 103: 341–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Christensen DA, Rapoport NY, Pitt WG. Ultrasonic release of doxorubicin from Pluronic P105 micelles stabilized with an interpenetrating network of N,N-diethylacrylamide. J Control Release 2002; 83: 303–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae KH, Choi SH, Park SY, Lee Y, Park TG. Thermosensitive pluronic micelles stabilized by shell cross-linking with gold nanoparticles. Langmuir 2006; 22: 6380–6384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agut W, Brulet A, Schatz C, Taton D, Lecommandoux S. pH and temperature responsive polymeric micelles and polymersomes by self-assembly of poly[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate]-b-poly(glutamic acid) double hydrophilic block copolymers. Langmuir 2010; 26: 10546–10554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigot J, Charleux B, Cooke G, Delattre F, Fournier D, Lyskawa J, et al. Tetrathiafulvalene end-functionalized poly(N-isopropylacrylamide): A new class of amphiphilic polymer for the creation of multistimuli responsive micelles. J Am Chem Soc 2010; 132: 10796–10801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Aubrecht KB, Grubbs RB. Thermally induced changes in amphiphilicity drive reversible restructuring of assemblies of ABC triblock copolymers with statistical polyether blocks. J Am Chem Soc 2011; 133: 1058–1065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha MH, Choi J, Choi BG, Park K, Kim IH, Jeong B, et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel thermo-responsive F68 block copolymers with cell-adhesive RGD peptide. J Colloid Interface Sci 2011; 360: 78–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Wei H, Wu DQ, Yang B, Chen N, Cheng SX, et al. Thermo-responsive shell cross-linked PMMA-b-P(NIPAAm-co-NAS) micelles for drug delivery. Int J Pharm 2011; 420: 333–340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cui Q, Wu F, Wang E. Thermosensitive behavior of poly(ethylene glycol)-based block copolymer (PEG-b-PADMO) controlled via self-assembled microstructure. J Phys Chem B. 2011; 115: 5913–5922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya N, Shiotari Y, Tokunaga M, Matsunaga H, Yamanouchi H, Nakano K, et al. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles composed of naturally occurring amphiphilic proteins. Chem Commun (Camb) 2009; 35: 5287–5289
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Li J, Gao J, Li B, Xia Y, Meng Y, et al. The fine-tuning of thermosensitive and degradable polymer micelles for enhancing intracellular uptake and drug release in tumors. Biomaterials. 2011; 32: 3832–3844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao J, Bo S, Ji X. pH/temperature-responsive behavior of amphiphilic block copolymer micelles prepared using two different methods. Langmuir 2011; 27: 7385–7391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik SS, Ray JG, Savin DA. Temperature- and pH-responsive self-assembly of poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(lysine) block copolymers in aqueous solution. Langmuir 2011; 27: 7231–7240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlukhina S, Sukhishvili S. Polymer assemblies for controlled delivery of bioactive molecules from surfaces. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2011; 63: 822–836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safaei Nikouei N, Lavasanifar A. Characterization of the thermo- and pH-responsive assembly of triblock copolymers based on poly(ethylene glycol) and functionalized poly(epsilon-caprolactone). Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 3708–3718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong LE, West JL. Thermally responsive polymer-nanoparticle composites for biomedical applications. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2011; 3: 307–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss J, Laschewsky A. Temperature-induced self-assembly of triple-responsive triblock copolymers in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 2011; 27: 4465–4473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Guo C, Jia L, Liang X, Liu C, Liu H. Dual responsive copolymer micelles for drug controlled release. J Colloid Interface Sci 2010; 350: 22–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao C, He P, Xiao C, Gao X, Zhuang X, Chen X. Synthesis of temperature and pH-responsive crosslinked micelles from polypeptide-based graft copolymer. J Colloid Interface Sci 2011; 359: 436–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck ML, LaRue SM, Petros WP, Poulson JM, Yu D, Spasojevic I, et al. Phase I trial of doxorubicin-containing low temperature sensitive liposomes in spontaneous canine tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 4004–4010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong G, Anyarambhatla G, Petros WP, Braun RD, Colvin OM, Needham D, et al. Efficacy of liposomes and hyperthermia in a human tumor xenograft model: Importance of triggered drug release. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 6950–6957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Fain HD, Rapoport N. Ultrasound-enhanced tumor targeting of polymeric micellar drug carriers. Mol Pharm 2004; 1: 317–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao ZG, Fain HD, Rapoport N. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by micellar-encapsulated drug and ultrasound. J Control Release 2005; 102: 203–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Lukyanov AN, Chakilam AR, Torchilin VP. PEG-PE/phosphatidylcholine mixed immunomicelles specifically deliver encapsulated taxol to tumor cells of different origin and promote their efficient killing. J Drug Target 2003; 11: 87–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Myrup GD, Pitt WG, Christensen DA, Rapoport NY. Factors affecting acoustically triggered release of drugs from polymeric micelles. J Control Release 2000; 69: 43–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Diaz de la Rosa MA, Gabuji T, Zeng Y, Christensen DA, Pitt WG. Release of doxorubicin from unstabilized and stabilized micelles under the action of ultrasound. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2007; 7: 1028–1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin A, Muniruzzaman M, Rapoport N. Mechanism of the ultrasonic activation of micellar drug delivery. J Control Release 2001; 75: 69–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin A, Muniruzzaman M, Rapoport N. Acoustic activation of drug delivery from polymeric micelles: Effect of pulsed ultrasound. J Control Release 2001; 71: 239–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin A, Sun H, Husseini GA, Pitt WG, Christensen DA, Rapoport NY. Drug delivery in Pluronic micelles: Effect of high-frequency ultrasound on drug release from micelles and intracellular uptake. J Control Release 2002; 84: 39–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Marin A, Christensen DA. Ultrasound-activated micellar drug delivery. Drug Delivery Syst Sci 2002; 2: 37–46
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport N. Combined cancer therapy by micellar-encapsulated drug and ultrasound. Int J Pharm 2004; 277: 155–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Marin A, Luo Y, Prestwich GD, Muniruzzaman MD. Intracellular uptake and trafficking of Pluronic micelles in drug-sensitive and MDR cells: Effect on the intracellular drug localization. J Pharm Sci 2002; 91: 157–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 915–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana K, Uchida T, Ogawa K, Yamashita N, Tamura K. Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Lancet 1999; 353: 1409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Aoki M, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto K, et al. Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: Enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 2002; 9: 372–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniruzzaman MD, Marin A, Luo Y, Prestwich GD, Pitt WG, Husseini GA, et al. Intracellular uptake of Pluronic copolymers: Effect of the aggregation state. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2002; 25: 233–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N. Factors affecting ultrasound interactions with polymeric micelles and viable cells. Carrier-based drug delivery. Symposium Series, S Swenson. ACS, Washington, DC 2004; 161–173
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport N. Combined cancer therapy by micellar-encapsulated drug and ultrasound. Nanotechnology for cancer therapy, M Amiji. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 2006; 417–437
   Google Scholar
• Mohan P, Rapoport N. Doxorubicin as a molecular nanotheranostic agent: Effect of doxorubicin encapsulation in micelles or nanoemulsions on the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery and nuclear trafficking. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 1959–1973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee ES, Na K, Bae YH. Doxorubicin loaded pH-sensitive polymeric micelles for reversal of resistant MCF-7 tumor. J Control Release 2005; 103: 405–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC. Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 2008; 5: 505–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliabadi HM, Shahin M, Brocks DR, Lavasanifar A. Disposition of drugs in block copolymer micelle delivery systems: From discovery to recovery. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47: 619–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerlemans C, Bult W, Bos M, Storm G, Nijsen JF, Hennink WE. Polymeric micelles in anticancer therapy: Targeting, imaging and triggered release. Pharm Res 2010; 27: 2569–2589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchilin VP. Drug targeting. Eur J Pharm Sci 2000; 11S2: S81–91
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Nagasaki Y, Kato Y, Sugiyama Y, Kataoka K. Long-circulating poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(D,L-lactide) block copolymer micelles with modulated surface charge. J Control Release 2001; 77: 27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho H, Indig GL, Weichert J, Shin HC, Kwon GS, In vivo cancer imaging by poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(ϵ-caprolactone) micelles containing a near-infrared probe. Nanomedicine 2012;8:228–236
   Google Scholar
• Cho H, Kwon GS, Polymeric micelles for neoadjuvant cancer therapy and tumor-primed optical imaging. ACS Nano 2011;5:8721–8729
   Google Scholar
• Diezi TA, Takemoto JK, Davies NM, Kwon GS. Pharmacokinetics and nephrotoxicity of amphotericin B-incorporated poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(N-hexyl stearate l-aspartamide) micelles. J Pharm Sci 2011; 100: 2064–2070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon GS. Editorial for theme section on polymeric micelles for drug delivery. Pharm Res 2008; 25: 2053–2055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong MP, Yanez JA, Remsberg CM, Ohgami Y, Kwon GS, Davies NM, et al. Formulation of a geldanamycin prodrug in mPEG-b-PCL micelles greatly enhances tolerability and pharmacokinetics in rats. J Control Release 2008; 129: 33–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greish K, Fang J, Inutsuka T, Nagamitsu A, Maeda H. Macromolecular therapeutics: Advantages and prospects with special emphasis on solid tumour targeting. Clin Pharmacokinet 2003; 42: 1089–1105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greish K, Sawa T, Fang J, Akaike T, Maeda H. SMA-doxorubicin, a new polymeric micellar drug for effective targeting to solid tumours. J Control Release 2004; 97: 219–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport NY, Kennedy AM, Shea JE, Scaife CL, Nam K-H. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles. J Control Release 2009; 138: 268–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husseini GA, Diaz de la Rosa MA, Richardson ES, Christensen DA, Pitt WG. The role of cavitation in acoustically activated drug delivery. J Control Release 2005; 107: 253–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo N, Okada K, Yamamoto K. Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells. Biophys J 2009; 96: 4866–4876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohl CD, Arora M, Ikink R, de Jong N, Versluis M, Delius M, et al. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys J 2006; 91: 4285–4295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito M, Mazda O, Takahashi KA, Arai Y, Kishida T, Shin-Ya M, et al. Sonoporation mediated transduction of pDNA/siRNA into joint synovium in vivo. J Orthop Res 2007; 25: 1308–1316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M, et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: Drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release 2006; 112: 149–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasovitski B, Frenkel V, Shoham S, Kimmel E. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 3258–3263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa K, Tachibana K, Uchida T, Tai T, Yamashita N, Tsujita N, et al. High-resolution scanning electron microscopic evaluation of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound. Med Electron Microsc 2001; 34: 249–253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran TA, Le Guennec JY, Bougnoux P, Tranquart F, Bouakaz A. Characterization of cell membrane response to ultrasound activated microbubbles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008; 55: 43–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudina A, Lepetit-Coiffe M, Moonen CT. Evaluation of the temporal window for drug delivery following ultrasound-mediated membrane permeability enhancement. Mol Imaging Biol 2011; 13: 239–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarnitsyn V, Rostad CA, Prausnitz MR. Modeling transmembrane transport through cell membrane wounds created by acoustic cavitation. Biophys J 2008; 95: 4124–4138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope DA, Dewhirst MW, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, Zalutsky MR. Enhanced delivery of a monoclonal antibody F(ab')2 fragment to subcutaneous human glioma xenografts using local hyperthermia. Cancer Res. 1990; 50: 1803–1809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara K, Watanabe T. Effects of hyperthermia, radiotherapy and thermoradiotherapy on tumor microvascular permeability. Acta Pathol Jpn 1990; 40: 79–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hosono MN, Hosono M, Endo K, Ueda R, Onoyama Y. Effect of hyperthermia on tumor uptake of radiolabeled anti-neural cell adhesion molecule antibody in small-cell lung cancer xenografts. J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 504–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefor AT, Makohon S, Ackerman NB. The effects of hyperthermia on vascular permeability in experimental liver metastasis. J Surg Oncol 1985; 28: 297–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster JM, Zalutsky MR, Noska MA, Dodge R, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, et al. Hyperthermic modulation of radiolabelled antibody uptake in a human glioma xenograft and normal tissues. Int J Hyperthermia 1995; 11: 59–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger W, Mayer WK, Schaefer C, Stohrer M, Vaupel P. Acute changes of systemic parameters in tumour-bearing rats, and of tumour glucose, lactate, and ATP levels upon local hyperthermia and/or hyperglycaemia. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1991; 117: 409–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka H, Furusawa M, Tomoda H, Seo Y, Sugimachi K. Efficacy of indomethacin pretreatment with regional hyperthermia for treating upper abdominal malignancies. Int J Hyperthermia 1995; 11: 169–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page RL, Meyer RE, Thrall DE, Dewhirst MW. Cardiovascular and metabolic response of tumour-bearing dogs to whole body hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia 1987; 3: 513–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Krol A, Wright A, Needham D, Dewhirst MW, Yuan F. Tumor microvascular permeability is a key determinant for antivascular effects of doxorubicin encapsulated in a temperature sensitive liposome. Int J Hyperthermia 2008; 24: 475–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Gao Z, Kennedy A. Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 1095–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Kennedy AM, Shea JE, Scaife CL, Nam KH. Ultrasonic nanotherapy of pancreatic cancer: Lessons from ultrasound imaging. Mol Pharm 2010; 7: 22–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport N, Nam K-H, Gupta R, Gao Z, Mohan P, Payne A, et al. Ultrasound-mediated tumor imaging and nanotherapy using drug loaded, block copolymer stabilized perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions. J Control Release 2011; 153: 4–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport NY, Efros AL, Christensen DA, Kennedy AM, Nam KH. Microbubble generation in phase-shift nanoemulsions used as anticancer drug carriers. Bub Sci Eng Tech 2009; 1: 31–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar