Gene Transfection Enhanced by Ultrasound Exposure Combined with Drug Treatment Guided by Gene Chip Analysis

References

• Miller MW, Gene transfection and drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000 May;26 Suppl 1:S59-62
   Google Scholar
• Newman CM, Bettinger T. Gene therapy progress and prospects: Ultrasound for gene transfer. Gene Ther Mar, 2007; 14(6)465–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal S, Mitragotri S. Ultrasound-induced cavitation: Applications in drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv Nov, 2006; 3(6)713–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao X, Kim K-S, Liu D. Nonviral gene delivery: What we know and what is next. The AAPS Journal 2007; 9(1)E92–E104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DL, Dou C. Induction of apoptosis in sonoporation and ultrasonic gene transfer. Ultrasound Med Biol Jan, 2009; 35(1)144–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim A, Taylor SL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol Aug, 2006; 32(8)1269–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarnitsyn VG, Prausnitz MR. Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol Apr, 2004; 30(4)527–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvshani-Eshet M, Baruch L, Kesselman E, Shimoni E, Machluf M. Therapeutic ultrasound-mediated DNA to cell and nucleus: Bioeffects revealed by confocal and atomic force microscopy. Gene Ther Jan, 2006; 13(2)163–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman HR, McNamara AJ, Nguyen DX, Prausnitz MR. Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: A unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius. Ultrasound Med Biol Aug, 2003; 29(8)1211–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram J, Mellein BR, Mitragotri S. An experimental and theoretical analysis of ultrasound-induced permeabilization of cell membranes. Biophys J May, 2003; 84(5)3087–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahi A, Domhan S, Jenne JW, Hallaj M, Dell'Aqua G, Mueckenthaler M, et al. Apoptosis signals in lymphoblasts induced by focused ultrasound. FASEB J Sep, 2004; 18(12)1413–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hundt W, Yuh EL, Bednarski MD, Guccione S. Gene expression profiles, histologic analysis, and imaging of squamous cell carcinoma model treated with focused ultrasound beams. AJR Am J Roentgenol Sep, 2007; 189(3)726–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuchi Y, Ando H, Takasaki I, Feril LB, Jr, Zhao QL, Ogawa R, Kudo N, Tachibana K, Kondo T. Identification of genes responsive to low intensity pulsed ultrasound in a human leukemia cell line Molt-4. Cancer Lett Feb 8, 2007; 246(1-2)149–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furusawa Y, Zhao QL, Hassan MA, Tabuchi Y, Takasaki I, Wada S, Kondo T. Ultrasound-induced apoptosis in the presence of Sonazoid and associated alterations in gene expression levels: A possible therapeutic application. Cancer Lett Feb 1, 2010; 288(1)107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuchi Y, Takasaki I, Zhao QL, Wada S, Hori T, Feril LB, Jr, Tachibana K, Nomura T, Kondo T. Genetic networks responsive to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in human lymphoma U937 cells. Cancer Lett Nov 8, 2008; 270(2)286–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Paliwal S, Bankiewicz KS, Bringas JR, Heart G, Mitragotri S, Prausnitz MR. Ultrasound-enhanced drug transport and distribution in the brain. AAPS PharmSciTech Sep, 2010; 11(3)1005–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Tenev T, Martins LM, Downward J, Lemoine NR. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway regulates survivin degradation in a cell cycle-dependent manner. J Cell Sci Dec, 2000; 113(Pt 23)4363–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalejta RF, Brideau AD, Banfield BW, Beavis AJ. An integral membrane green fluorescent protein marker, Us9-GFP, is quantitatively retained in cells during propidium iodide-based cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry. Exp Cell Res Apr 10, 1999; 248(1)322–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2-[Delta][Delta]CT Method. Methods 2001; 25(4)402–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastan MB, Zhan Q, el-Deiry WS, Carrier F, Jacks T, Walsh WV, Plunkett BS, Vogelstein B, Fornace Jr AJ. A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia. Cell Nov 13, 1992; 71(4)587–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearsey JM, Coates PJ, Prescott AR, Warbrick E, Hall PA. Gadd45 is a nuclear cell cycle regulated protein which interacts with p21Cip1. Oncogene Nov 2, 1995; 11(9)1675–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W, Richter G, Cereseto A, Beadling C, Smith KA. Cytokine response gene 6 induces p21 and regulates both cell growth and arrest. Oncogene 1999; 18(47)6573–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkin DP, Bean JM, Miklos D, Song Y-H, Truong VB, Englert C, Christians FC, Ellisen LW, Maheswaran S, Oliner JD, et al. Induction of GADD45 and JNK/SAPK-Dependent Apoptosis following Inducible Expression of BRCA1. Cell 1999; 97(5)575–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XW, Zhan Q, Coursen JD, Khan MA, Kontny HU, Yu L, Hollander MC, O'Connor PM, Fornace AJ, Harris CC. GADD45 induction of a G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. P Natl Acad Sci USA March 30, 1999; 96(7)3706–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebermann DA, Hoffman B. Gadd45 in stress signaling. J Mol Signal 2008; 3: 15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Champoux JJ. DNA topoisomerases: Structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem 2001; 70: 369–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami PC, Roti Roti JL, Hunt CR. The cell cycle-coupled expression of topoisomerase IIalpha during S phase is regulated by mRNA stability and is disrupted by heat shock or ionizing radiation. Mol Cell Biol Apr, 1996; 16(4)1500–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanasiou MA, Kerr NC, Robbins JH, McBride OW, Alamo I, Jr, Barrett SF, Hickson ID, Fornace Jr AJ. Induction by ionizing radiation of the gadd45 gene in cultured human cells: Lack of mediation by protein kinase C. Mol Cell Biol Feb, 1991; 11(2)1009–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laabich A, Li G, Cooper NG. Characterization of apoptosis-genes associated with NMDA mediated cell death in the adult rat retina. Brain Res Mol Brain Res Jul 13, 2001; 91(1–2)34–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uberti D, Meli E, Memo M. Expression of cell-cycle-related proteins and excitoxicity. Amino Acids 2002; 23(1-3)27–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert JM, Gorzov P, Veprintsev DB, Soderqvist M, Segerback D, Bergman J, Fersht AR, Hainaut P, Wiman KG, Bykov VJ. PRIMA-1 reactivates mutant p53 by covalent binding to the core domain. Cancer Cell May 5, 2009; 15(5)376–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehested M, Jensen PB. Mapping of DNA topoisomerase II poisons (etoposide, clerocidin) and catalytic inhibitors (aclarubicin, ICRF-187) to four distinct steps in the topoisomerase II catalytic cycle. Biochem Pharmacol Apr 12, 1996; 51(7)879–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden DA, Osheroff N. Mechanism of action of eukaryotic topoisomerase II and drugs targeted to the enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta Oct 1, 1998; 1400(1-3)139–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andoh T, Ishida R. Catalytic inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II. Biochim Biophys Acta Oct 1, 1998; 1400(1-3)155–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson EM, Tewey KM, Liu LF. Mechanism of antitumor drug action: Poisoning of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II on DNA by 4′-(9-acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Mar, 1984; 81(5)1361–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthman H, Magnusson G. High efficiency polyoma DNA transfection of chloroquine treated cells. Nucl Acids Res March, 1983; 11(5)1295–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxfield FR. Weak Bases and Ionophores Rapidly and Reversibly Raise the Ph of Endocytic Vesicles in Cultured Mouse Fibroblasts. Journal of Cell Biology 1982; 95(2)676–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu LF. DNA Topoisomerase Poisons as Antitumor Drugs. Annu Rev Biochem 1989; 58: 351–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salido M, Larran J, Lopez A, Vilches J, Aparicio J. Etoposide sensitivity of human prostatic cancer cell lines PC-3, DU 145 and LNCaP. Histol Histopathol Jan, 1999; 14(1)125–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brussel JP, van Steenbrugge GJ, Romijn JC, Schroder FH, Mickisch GH. Chemosensitivity of prostate cancer cell lines and expression of multidrug resistance-related proteins. Eur J Cancer Apr, 1999; 35(4)664–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan EE, Geiger RC, Miller AM, Loh-Marley PL, Suzuki T, Miyata N, Dean DA. Microtubule Acetylation Through HDAC6 Inhibition Results in Increased Transfection Efficiency. Molecular Therapy Nov, 2008; 16(11)1841–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz SB. Taxol (paclitaxel): Mechanisms of action. Ann Oncol 1994; 5(Suppl 6)S3–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suomalainen M, Nakano MY, Keller S, Boucke K, Stidwill RP, Greber UF. Microtubule-dependent plus- and minus end-directed motilities are competing processes for nuclear targeting of adenovirus. J Cell Biol Feb 22, 1999; 144(4)657–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa-Goto K, Tanaka K, Gibson W, Moriishi E, Miura Y, Kurata T, Irie S, Sata T. Microtubule network facilitates nuclear targeting of human cytomegalovirus capsid. J Virol Aug, 2003; 77(15)8541–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausinger R, von Gersdorff K, Braeckmans K, Ogris M, Wagner E, Brauchle C, Zumbusch A. The transport of nanosized gene carriers unraveled by live-cell imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Feb 27, 2006; 45(10)1568–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan EE, Dean DA. Intracellular trafficking of plasmids during transfection is mediated by microtubules. Mol Ther Feb, 2006; 13(2)422–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazdur R, Kudelka AP, Kavanagh JJ, Cohen PR, Raber MN. The taxoids: Paclitaxel (Taxol) and docetaxel (Taxotere). Cancer Treat Rev Oct, 1993; 19(4)351–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto Y, Muto E, Mashimo T, Iwane AH, Yoshiya I, Yanagida T. Direct inhibition of microtubule-based kinesin motility by local anesthetics. Biophys J Feb, 2000; 78(2)940–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayad SR, White A. The effect of the local anaesthetic, tetracaine, on the isoprenaline and prostaglandin E1 stimulation of cAMP in normal and malignant cell lines. Exp Cell Res Jun, 1977; 107(1)201–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto A, Tagawa Y, Yoshimori T, Moriyama Y, Masaki R, Tashiro Y. Bafilomycin A1 prevents maturation of autophagic vacuoles by inhibiting fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes in rat hepatoma cell line, H-4-II-E cells. Cell Struct Funct Feb, 1998; 23(1)33–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: Kinetics of plasmid internalization and gene expression. J Control Release May 5, 2005; 104(1)203–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larina IV, Evers BM, Esenaliev RO. Optimal drug and gene delivery in cancer cells by ultrasound-induced cavitation. Anticancer Res Jan–Feb, 2005; 25(1A)149–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry AM, Chresta CM, Davies SM, Walker MC, Harris AL, Hartley JA, Masters JRW, Hickson ID. Relationship between Topoisomerase II Level and Chemosensitivity in Human Tumor Cell Lines. Cancer Res December, 1991; 51(24)6592–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzi C, Cassinelli G, Cuccuru G, Supino R, Zuco V, Ferlini C, Scambia G, Zunino F. Cell cycle checkpoint efficiency and cellular response to paclitaxel in prostate cancer cells. Prostate Sep 15, 2001; 48(4)254–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatten H, Ripple M, Balczon R, Weindruch R, Chakrabarti A, Taylor M, Hueser CN. Androgen and taxol cause cell type-specific alterations of centrosome and DNA organization in androgen-responsive LNCaP and androgen-independent DU145 prostate cancer cells. J Cell Biochem Jan, 2000; 76(3)463–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourpak A, Landowski TH, Dorr RT. Ethonafide-induced cytotoxicity is mediated by topoisomerase II inhibition in prostate cancer cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther Jun, 2007; 321(3)1109–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano T, An T, Zwelling LA, Takano H, Fojo AT, Kleinerman ES. Transfection of a human topoisomerase II alpha gene into etoposide-resistant human breast tumor cells sensitizes the cells to etoposide. Oncol Res 1996; 8(3)101–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronner C, Hopfner R, Mousli M. Transcriptional regulation of the human topoisomerase IIalpha gene. Anticancer Res Mar–Apr, 2002; 22(2A)605–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Qian H, Li X, Wang H, Yu J, Liu Y, Zhang X, Liang X, Fu M, Zhan Q, et al. Adenoviral-mediated gene transfer of Gadd45a results in suppression by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in pancreatic cancer cell. J Gene Med Jan, 2009; 11(1)3–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West A, Priante G, Lahdetie J. Stage-specific expression of Gadd45 induced by X-irradiation in rat spermatogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol Jan, 2002; 78(1)29–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotten M, Langle-Rouault F, Kirlappos H, Wagner E, Mechtler K, Zenke M, Beug H, Birnstiel ML. Transferrin-Polycation-Mediated Introduction of DNA into Human Leukemic Cells: Stimulation by Agents that Affect the Survival of Transfected DNA or Modulate Transferrin Receptor Levels. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87(11)4033–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar