Survival and regeneration of deep-freeze preserved autologous cranial bones after cranioplasty

References

• Yamada H, Sakai N, Takada M, Ando T, Kagawa Y. Cranioplasty utilizing a preserved autogenous bone flap coated with acrylic resin. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1980;52:273–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asano Y, Ryuke Y, Hasuo M, Simosawa S. Cranioplasty using cryopreserved autogenous bone [in Japanese]. No To Shinkei 1993; 45:1145–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grossman N, Shemesh-Jan HS, Merkin V, Gideon M, Cohen A. Deep-freeze preservation of cranial bones for future cranioplasty: nine years of experience in Soroka University Medical Center. Cell Tissue Bank 2007;8:243–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Laere K, Casier K, Uyttendaele D, . Technetium-99m-MDP scintigraphy and long-term follow-up of treated primary malignant bone tumors. J Nucl Med 1998;39:1563–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirschner MH, Manthey N, Tatsch K, Nerlich A, Hahn K, Hofmann GO. Use of three-phase bone scans and SPET in the follow-up of patients with allogenic vascularized femur transplants. Nucl Med Commun 1999;20:517–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz Z, Shani J, Soskolne WA, Touma H, Amir D, Sela J. Uptake and biodistribution of technetium-99m-MD32P during rat tibial bone repair. J Nucl Med 1993;34:104–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firtell DN, Grisius RJ. Cranioplasty of the difficult frontal region. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:425–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwama T, Yamada J, Imai S, Shinoda J, Funakoshi T, Sakai N. The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited. Neurosurg 2003;52:591–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards MS, Ousterhout DK. Autogeneic skull bone grafts to reconstruct large or complex skull defects in children and adolescents. Neurosurg 1987;20:273–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings CE 3rd, Wilkins RH, Hanker JS, Georgiade NG, Harrelson JM. Evaluation in cats of a new material for cranioplasty: a composite of plaster of Paris and hydroxylapatite. J Neurosurg 1988;69:269–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammon WM, Kempe LG. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty. 13 years experience with 417 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1971; 25:69–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benzel EC, Thammavaram K, Kesterson L. The diagnosis of infections associated with acrylic cranioplasties. Neuroradiol 1990; 32:151–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blum KS, Schneider SJ, Rosenthal AD. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg 1997; 26:33–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono I, Gunji H, Kaneko F, Numazawa S, Kodama N, Yoza S. Treatment of extensive cranial bone defects using computer-designed hydroxyapatite ceramics and periosteal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:819–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujovny M, Aviles A, Anger C. An innovative approach for cranioplasty using hydroxyapatite cement. Surg Neurol 1997; 48:294–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pompili A, Caroli F, Carpanese L, . Cranioplasty performed with a new osteoconductive osteoinducing hydroxyapatite-derived material. J Neurosurg 1998;89:236–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake H, Ohta T, Tanaka H. A new technique for cranioplasty with L-shaped titanium plates and combination ceramic implants composed of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (Ceratite). Neurosurgery 2000;46:414–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon DS, Blair GA. Titanium cranioplasty. Br Med J 1974; 2:478–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blair GA, Gordon DS, Simpson DA. Cranioplasty in children. Childs Brain 1980;6:82–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malis LI. Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 1989;25:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler CL, Uttley D, Archer DJ, MacVicar D. Imaging after titanium cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 1994;8:409–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchac D, Greensmith A. Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:744–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itokawa H, Hiraide T, Moriya M, . A 12-month in vivo study on the response of bone to a hydroxyapatite-polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty composite. Biomaterials 2007;28:4922–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe JM, McDermott PJ, Linney AD, Mosse CA, Harris M. Computer generated titanium cranioplasty: report of a new technique for repairing skull defects. Br J Neurosurg 1992;6:343–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo N, Roy ID, Desai AP, Gupta V. Comparative evaluation of autogenous calvarial bone graft and alloplastic materials for secondary reconstruction of cranial defects. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:79–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang JY, Liu BH, Jiang N, Gao MM, Yuan P. Clinical analysis of the results in 3 cases titanium mesh exposed after cranioplasty [in Chinese]. Chin J Neurosurgery 2010;26:50.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott H, Scott HJ. The bone-bank in neurosurgery. Br J Surg 1951;39:31–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odom GL, Woodhall B, Wrenn FR. The use of refrigerated autogenous bone flaps for cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 1952;9:606–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott KH. Use of frozen cranial bone flaps for autogenous and homologous grafts in cranioplasty and spinal interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 1953;10:380–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock DO. The fate of replaced bone flaps. J Neurosurg 1963; 20: 983–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Itoh Y. Clinicopathological study of cranioplasty using freeze-preserved autogenous skull [in Japanese]. J Tokyo Med Coll 1991; 49:550–64.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki F. Clinical and experimental study for cranioplasty with autogenous frozen bone graft [in Japanese]. J Wakayama Med Soc 1994;45:217–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wittbjer J, Palmer B, Rohlin M, Thorngren KG. Osteogenetic activity in composite grafts of demineralized compact bone and marrow. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;173:229–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lysell L, Rohlin M. Initial Tc-99m diphosphonate uptake in mineralized and demineralized bone implants in rats. Int J Oral Surg 1985;14:371–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:778–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusiak JF, Zins JE, Whitaker LA. The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;76:510–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phemister DB. The fate of transplanted bone and regenerative power of its various constituents. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1914;19: 303–33.
   Google Scholar
• Prolo DJ, Burres KP, McLaughlin WT, Christensen AH. Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen) with consideration of the cellular response. Neurosurgery 1979;4:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar