Intraoperative stereoscopic 3D video imaging: pushing the boundaries of surgical visualisation and applications for neurosurgical education

References

• Kroeker K. Looking beyond stereoscopic 3D's revival. Communications of the ACM [serial on the Internet] 2010;53(8):14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Tomazevic D, Likar B, Pernus F. Gradient-based registration of 3D MR and 2D X-ray images. International Congress Series, Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2001:338–45.
   Google Scholar
• Henn JS, Lemole GM, Jr, Ferreira MA, Gonzalez LF, Schornak M, Preul MC, . Interactive stereoscopic virtual reality: A new tool for neurosurgical education. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2002;96:144–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronningsaeter A, Lie T, Kleven A, Morland T, Lango T, Unsgard G, . Initial experience with stereoscopic visualization of three-dimensional ultrasound data in surgery. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1074–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser JF, Allen B, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: Subjective and objective comparison to 2D. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009;52:25–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komotar RJ, Schwartz TH. The utility of 3D computer-based models in endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2011;75:39–40.
   Google Scholar
• Roth J, Fraser JF, Singh A, Bernardo A, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Surgical approaches to the orbital apex: Comparison of endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches using a novel 3D endoscope. Orbit 2011;30:43–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferragallo R. On stereoscopic painting. Leonardo [serial on the Internet]. 1974;7. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1572788.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol 1967;193:327–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StereoGraphics Corporation. Stereographics Developers’ Handbook [Electronic file]. San Rafael CA: StereoGraphics Corporation, 1997. Available from: http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/stc/FAQs/Stereo/stereo-handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Servos P, Goodale M, Jakobson L. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Res 1992;32:1513–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser J. Make your own stereo pictures. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M, da Costa Astur D, Kaleka CC, Arliani GG, Cohen C, Jalikjian W, . Introducing 3-dimensional stereoscopic imaging to the study of musculoskeletal anatomy. Arthroscopy 2011; 27:593–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xing L, You J, Ebrahimi T, Perkins A. Estimating quality of experience on stereoscopic images. Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications (ISPACS), 2010 International Symposium Issue date: Dec 6–8, 2010 ed. Trondheim, Norway: IEEE Xplore Digital Library, 2010. pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Seuntiens P, Heynderickx I, IJesselsteijn W, van den Avoort P, Berentsen J, Dalm I, . Viewing experience and naturalness of 3D images. Proc SPIE [serial on the Internet] 2005;6016:601605. Available from: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/resource/2/psisdg/6016/1/601605_1?isAuthorized = no.
   Google Scholar
• Lo CH, Chalmers A. Stereo vision for computer graphics: The effect that stereo vision has on human judgments of visual realism. SCCG ‘03 Proceedings of the 19th spring converence on computer graphics [serial on the Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id = 984971.
   Google Scholar
• Servos P, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS. The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Res. 1992;32:1513–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhorter S, Hodges L, Rodriguez W. Evaluation of display parameters affecting user performance of an interactive task in a virtual environment. SMARTech [serial on the Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/3725.
   Google Scholar
• Smith D, Cole R, Merritt J, Pepper R, Naval Ocean Systems Center San Diego CA. Remote operator performance comparing mono and stereo TV displays: The effects of visibility, learning and task factors. Storming Media [serial on the Internet]. 1979. Available from: http://www.stormingmedia.us/10/1028/A102860.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kim W, Ellis S, Hannaford B, Tyler M, Stark L. A quantitative evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays in three-axis manual tracking tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber. 1987;17:61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beurden M, van Hoey G, Hatzakis H, Ijsselsteijn W. Stereoscopic displays in medical domains: A review of perception and performance effects. Proc SPIE [serial on the Internet]. 2009;7240:72400A. Available from: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/resource/2/psisdg/7240/1/72400A_1?bypassSSO = 1.
   Google Scholar
• Tung T, Rathinam A, Kumarl Y, Rahman Z. Additional cues derived from three dimensional image processing to aid customised reconstruction for medical applications. In: al. HBZe, ed. IVIC 2009, LNCS 5857. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009:148–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Keehner M, Cohen C, Montello D, Lippa Y. The role of spatial cognition in medicine: Applications for selecting and training professionals. In: Allen G, ed. Applied spatial cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007:285–315.
   Google Scholar
• Luursema JM, Kommers PA, Verweij WB, Geelkerken RH. Stereopsis in medical virtual-learning-environments. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;103:262–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar