Test–re-test reliability of the virtual planning test in individuals with traumatic brain injury

References

• Lezak MD. The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology 1982; 17: 281–297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment4th. Oxford University Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Rees L, Marshall S, Hartridge C, Mackie D, Weiser M. Cognitive interventions post acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 161–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott R. Executive functions and their disorders. British Medical Bulletin 2003; 65: 49–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg E, Bougakov D. Neuropsychologic assessment of frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2005; 28: 567–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Whyte J, Kim J, Vaccaro M. Executive function and self-awareness of “real-world” behavior and attention deficits following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 333–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone K, Levin H, Malec J, Stuss D, Whyte J. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: Moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006; 18: 1212–1222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review 2003; 13: 181–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia GA, Isquith PK. Ecological assessment of executive function in traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004; 25: 135–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett PC, Ong B, Ponsford J. Assessment of executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: A comparison of the BADS with other clinical neuropsychological measures. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005; 11: 606–613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, Kay GG, Curtiss G. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL 1993
   Google Scholar
• Reitan RM, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychology Test Battery. Neuropsychology Press, Tucson, AZ 1985
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Alderman N, Burgess P, Emslie H, Evans J. Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk 1996
   Google Scholar
• Grace J, Malloy PF. Frontal Systems Behavior Scale professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL 2001
   Google Scholar
• Shallice T, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain 1991; 114: 727–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miotto EC, Morris RG. Virtual planning in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Cortex 1998; 34: 639–657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics4th. McGraw Hill, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests3rd. Oxford University Press, New York 2006
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Alderman N, Burgess P. The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998; 8: 213–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips LH. Do “frontal tests” measure executive function? Issues of assessment and evidence from fluency tests. Methodology of frontal and executive function, P Rabbit. Psychology Press, Hove, UK 1997; 191–213
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Goldstein R. Test-re-test reliability of the VIrtual Planning Test. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1191–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB, Zgaljardic DJ. Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998; 20: 339–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe C, Rabbitt P. Test/re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: Theoretical and practical issues. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 915–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu B-C, Millis S, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Hanks R, Novack T, Hart T. Measuring recovery in new learning and memory following traumatic brain injury: A mixed-effects modeling approach. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2007; 29: 617–625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengenfelder J, Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. The efficacy of the generation effect in improving new learning in persons with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2007; 52: 290–296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton AL, Hamsher K, Sivan AB. Multilingual aphasia examination3rd. AJA Associates, Iowa City, IA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935; 18: 643–662
   Google Scholar
• Ettenhofer ML, Hambrick DZ, Abeles N. Reliability and stability of executive functioning in older adults. Neuropsychology 2006; 20: 607–613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Evans J, Emslie H, Wilson BA. The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1998; 4: 547–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Alderman N, Forbes C, Costello A, Coates L M-A, Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Gilbert SJ, Dumontheil I, Channon S. The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 194–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen M, Wilhelm KL. Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, RJ Sbordone, CJ Long. St. Lucie, Boca Raton, FL 1996; 91–112
   Google Scholar
• Alderman N, Burgess PW, Knight C, Henman C. Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2003; 9: 31–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice2nd. Prentice Hall Health, Highland Park, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia (NCCEA), Revised Edition. University of Victoria, Neuropsychology Laboratory. 1977
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Brandt J, Benedict RHB. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Lutz, FL 2001
   Google Scholar
• Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B. Assessing intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 3431–3446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro AM, Benedict RH, Schretlen D, Brandt J. Construct and concurrent validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1999; 13: 348–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherner M, Suarez P, Lazzaretto D, i Fortuny LA, Mindt MR, Dawes S, Marcotte T, Grant I, Heaton R. Demographically corrected norms for the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-revised and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-revised in monolingual Spanish speakers from the U.S.–Mexico border region. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2007; 22: 343–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Grant I, Temkin NR. Test–retest reliability and practice effects of Expanded Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1999; 5: 346–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar