Theory of Mind in patients with ventromedial or dorsolateral prefrontal lesions following traumatic brain injury

References

• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, Neuropsychological assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Spatt J, Zebenholzer K, Oder W. Psychosocial long-term outcome of severe head injury as perceived by patients, relatives, and professionals. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1997; 95: 173–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis M, Purvis K, Barnes MA, Wilkinson M, Winner E. Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. Brain and Language 2001; 78: 1–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language 1996; 53: 81–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner E, Brownell H, Happé F, Blum A, Pincus D. Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 1998; 62: 89–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surian L, Siegal M. Sources of performance on theory of mind tasks in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language 2001; 78: 224–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro J, Spiers M. Social cognitive factors in brain injury—associated personality change. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 265–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslinger PJ. Neurological and neuropsychological bases of empathy. European Neurology 1998; 39: 193–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby H, McDonald S. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43: 99–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry JD, Philips LH, Crawford JR, Ietswaart B, Summer F. Theory of mind following traumatic brain injury: The role of emotion recognition and executive dysfunction. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 1623–1628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The reading the mind in the eyes test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome and high functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2001; 42: 241–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson D, Apperly IA, Kathirgamanathan U, Humphreys GW. Seeing it my way: A case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective. Brain 2005; 128: 1102–1111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havet–Thomassin V, Allain P, Etcharry Bouyx F, Le Gall D. What about theory of mind after severe brain injury?. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 83–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe AD, Bullock PR, Polkey CE. ‘Theory of mind’ impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain 2001; 124: 600–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach L, Happé F, Fleminger S, Powell J. Theory of mind: Independence of executive function and role of the frontal cortex in acquired brain injury. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2000; 5: 175–192
   Google Scholar
• Varley R, Siegal M, Want SC. Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase 2001; 7: 489–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio D, Frith C. Meeting of mind: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews 2006; 7: 268–277
   Google Scholar
• Siegal M, Varley R. Neural systems involved in ‘theory of mind’. Nature Reviews in Neuroscience 2002; 3: 463–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happaney K, Zelazo PD, Stuss DT. Development of orbitofrontal function: Current themes and future directions. Brain & Cognition 2004; 55: 1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998; 10: 640–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler ED. The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: Implications for clinical neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2001; 16: 95–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaetz M. The neurophysiology of brain injury. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004; 115: 4–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennarelli TA. Mechanisms of brain injury. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1993; 11: 5–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gennarelli TA, Graham DI. Neuropathology of head injuries. Seminar in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 1998; 3: 160–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams JH, Doyle D, Graham DI, Lawrence AE, McLellan DR, Gennarelli TA, Pastuszko M, Sakamoto T. The contusion index: A reappraisal in human and experimental non-missile head injury. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 1985; 1: 299–308
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE, Sisson RA, Overall JE, Rhoades HM, Eisenberg HM, Kalisky Z, Gary HE. The neurobehavioral rating scale: Assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1987; 50: 183–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher PC, Happé F, Frith U, Baker SC, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD. Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition 1995; 57: 109–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel V, Grafman J, Sadato N, Hallett M. Modelling other minds. Neuroreport 1995; 6: 1741–1746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher HL, Happé F, Brunswick N, Fletcher PC, Frith U, Frith CD. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 11–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Goodhart F. The “seeing leads to knowing” deficit in autism: The Pratt and Bryant probe. British Journal of Developmental Psychology (A) 1994; 12: 397–402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher HL, Frith CD. Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003; 7: 77–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe R, Kanwisher N. People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in ‘theory of mind’. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1835–1842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Gallup GG, Jr, Alexander MP. The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’. Brain 2001; 124: 279–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg H, A re-examination of the theory of mind hypothesis of autism. In: Burack J, Charman T, Yirmiya N, Zelazo P, editors. The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sabbagh MA. Understanding orbitofrontal contributions to theory-of-mind reasoning: Implications for autism. Brain and Cognition 2004; 55: 209–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers L, Ring B. A neuroethological framework for the representation of minds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1992; 4: 107–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie AM, ‘Theory of mind’ as a mechanism of selective attention. In: Gazzaniga M, editor. The new cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000. pp. 1–10
   Google Scholar
• Surian L, Leslie AM. Competence and performance in false belief understanding: A comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1999; 17: 141–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes CA, Baird AA, Grafton ST. Differential role of the orbital frontal lobe in emotional versus cognitive perspective-taking. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 374–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S. Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury; the interaction between emotional recognition, mentalizing ability and social communication. Neuropsychology 2004; 18: 572–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory S, Aharon-Peretz J. Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 3054–3067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory S, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D. Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Brain 2009; 132: 617–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, Piamarta F, Consoli T, Villa ML, Forapani E, Russo A, Nichelli P. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): Normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurological Science 2005; 26: 108–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P, Levels of cognitive functioning. Rehabilitation of the head injured adult: Comprehensive cognitive management. Downey, CA: Professional Staff Association of the Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Inc.; 1979
   Google Scholar
• Damasio H, Damasio A, Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Serafin M, Surian L. Il Test degli Occhi: Uno strumento per valutare la ‘teoria della mente’. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia 2004; 31: 213–236
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, O'Riordan M, Stone V, Jones R, Plaisted K. Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1999; 29: 407–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton KR, Chelune GJ, Talley Kay GG, Curtiss G, Wisconsin card sorting test manual revised and expanded. P.E.A., Odessa, Florence; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Laiacona M, Inzaghi MG, De Tanti A, Capitani E. Wisconsin card sorting test: A new global score, with Italian norms, and its relationship with the Weigl sorting test. Journal of Neurological Science 2001; 21: 279–291
   Google Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory S, Tomer R, Berger B, Goldsher D, Aharon-Peretz J. Impaired “Affective Theory of Mind” is associated with right Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology 2005; 18: 55–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon S, Crawford S. The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: Left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 1007–1017
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?. Cognition 1985; 21: 37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza M, De Risio A, Surian L, Roncone R, Casacchia M. Selective impairments of theory of mind in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 2001; 47: 299–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith CD, Frith U. Interacting minds—a biological basis. Science 1999; 286: 1692–1695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith U, Frith CD. The biological basis of social interaction. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2001; 10: 151–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins A, Macrae CN, Mitchell JP. Repetition suppression of ventromedial prefrontal activity during judgments of self and others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 2008; 105: 4507–4512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grezes J, Frith C, Passingham RE. Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others. Journal of Neuroscience 2004; 24: 5500–5505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slessor G, Phillips LH, Bull R. Exploring the specificity of age-related differences in theory of mind tasks. Psychology and Aging 2006; 22: 639–643
   Google Scholar