A special messaging technology for two persons with acquired brain injury and multiple disabilities

References

• Cattelani R, Zettin M, Zoccolotti P. Rehabilitation treatments for adults with behavioral and psychosocial disorders following acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychology Review 2010; 20: 52–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2008; 40: 89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggio S, Wong M. Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 2009; 76: 163–172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B, Demakis G. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: A meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.'s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology 2009; 23: 20–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg T. Adults with acquired traumatic brain injury: Experiences of a changeover process and consequences in everyday life. Social Work in Health Care 2009; 48: 276–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehman P, Gentry T, West M, Arango-Lasprilla JC. Community integration: Current issues in cognitive and vocational rehabilitation for individuals with ABI. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2009; 46: 909–918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman IL, Lindberg Stenvall C, Hemmingsson H, Bartfai A. A training apartment with a set of electronic memory aids for patients with cognitive problems. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2010; 17: 140–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman IL, Tham K, Granqvist A, Bartfai A, Hemmingsson H. Using electronic aids to daily living after acquired brain injury: A study of the learning process and the usability. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2007; 2: 23–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksson G, Kottorp A, Borg J, Tham K. Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2009; 41: 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartland D. Considerations in the selection and use of technology with people who have cognitive deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 61–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki AL, Rudrud EH, Schulze KA, Rapp JT. Increasing therapeutic exercise participation by individuals with acquired brain injury using self-recording and reinforcement. Behavioral Interventions 2008; 23: 75–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Bryen DN. AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 217–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager S, Hux K, Beukelman DR, Karantounis R. Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 37–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greig CA, Harper R, Hirst T, Howe T, Davidson B. Barriers and facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2008; 15: 307–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePompei R, Gillette Y, Goetz E, Xenopoulos-Oddsson A, Bryen D, Dowds M. Practical applications for use of PDAs and smartphones with children and adolescents who have traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23: 487–499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, Lynch KB. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A community-based trial. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 19–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Hawkey K, Whyte J. Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A within-subjects trial. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 556–570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch N, Shenton M, Rowan J. A generic, ‘in-house’, alphanumeric paging system for prospective activity impairments after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 725–734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan SR, Cantor JB, Ashman TA. Traumatic brain injury: Future assessment tools and treatment prospects. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2008; 4: 877–892
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaggioli A, Meneghini A, Morganti F, Alcaniz M, Riva G. A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2006; 20: 503–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford N, Wilson PH. Virtual reality in acquired brain injury upper limb rehabilitation: Evidence-based evaluation of clinical research. Brain Injury 2009; 23: 179–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose FD, Brooks BM, Rizzo AA. Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2005; 8: 241–262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen KJ. Use of electronic communication to develop mentor-protégé relationships between adolescents and adult AAC users: Pilot study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2000; 16: 227–238
   Google Scholar
• Egan J, Chenoweth L, McAuliffe D. Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: A new and accessible method. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1283–1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Ehlhardt LA, Fickas S, Sutcliffe A. A pilot study exploring electronic (or e-mail) mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 609–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todis B, Sohlberg MM, Hood D, Fickas S. Making electronic mail accessible: Perspectives of people with acquired cognitive impairments, caregivers and professionals. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 389–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Use of a team-based approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: A pilot study. Assistive Technology 2007; 19: 109–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durando J. A survey on literacy instruction for students with multiple disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2008; 102: 40–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Green V, Chiapparino C, Stasolla F, Oliva D. A voice-detecting sensor and a scanning keyboard emulator to support word writing by two boys with extensive motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009; 30: 203–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavender A, Vanam R, Barney DK, Ladner RE, Riskin EA. MobileASL: Intelligibility of sign language vide over mobile phones. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2008; 3: 93–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change, 3rd. Allyn & Bacon, New York 2009
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Nonparametric statistics, 2nd. McGraw-Hill, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Oliva D, Megna G, Bosco A. Technology-based intervention options for post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2009; 12: 24–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naudé K, Hughes M. Considerations for the use of assistive technology in patients with impaired states of consciousness. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2005; 15: 514–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PM, Moon NW. Wireless technologies and accessibility for people with disabilities: Findings from a policy research instrument. Assistive Technology 2008; 20: 149–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordo P, Lutsep H, Cordo L, Wright WG, Cacciatore T, Skoss R. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): Coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009; 23: 67–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumisko E, Lexell J, Söderberg S. The meaning of feeling well in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2009; 18: 2273–2281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro M, Hart H, Whyte J, Buchhofer R. Internet use and interest among individuals with traumatic brain injury: A consumer survey. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2007; 2: 85–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings, 6th. Wadsworth, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson L, Hanson E. Supporting frail older people and their family carers at home using information and communication technology: Cost analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005; 51: 645–657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunninghm J, McDonnell A, Easton A, Sturmey P. Social validation data on three methods of physical restraint: Views of consumers, staff and students. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2003; 24: 307–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Groeneweg J, Bosco A, Tota A, Smaldone A, Stasolla F, Manfredi F, Baccani S, et al. A social validation assessment of microswitch-based programs for persons with multiple disabilities employing teacher trainees and parents as rates. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2006; 18: 383–391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy K. Single case designs for educational research. Allyn & Bacon, New York 2005
   Google Scholar