Conceptualizing functional cognition in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation

References

• Finkelstein E, Corso P, Miller T. The incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York 2006
   Google Scholar
• Capruso DX, Levin HS. Cognitive impairment following closed head injury. Neurologic Clinics 1992; 10: 879–893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS. Cognitive function outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Current Opinions in Neurology 1998; 11: 643–646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazaux JM, Masson F, Levin HS, Alaoui P, Maurette P, Barat M. Long-term neuropsychological outcomes and loss of social autonomy after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 1316–1320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal M, Ricker J. Traumatic brain injury. Handbook of rehabilitation psychology, RG Frank, TR Elliott. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 2000; 49–74
   Google Scholar
• Collins JG. Types of injuries by selected characteristics: United States. 1986–1988. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 1993; 2: 1–87
   Google Scholar
• Lew HL, Poole JH, Guillory SB, Salerno RM, Leskin G, Sigford B. Persistent problems after traumatic brain injury: The need for long-term follow-up and coordinated care. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2006; 43: vii–x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis SR, Rosenthal M, Novack TA, Sherer M, Nick TG, Kreutzer JS. Long-term neuropsychological outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 16: 343–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Loring DW, Howieson DB, Howieson D, Hannay HJ. Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th. Oxford University Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CS. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. Guilford Press, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Arciniegas DB, Held K, Wagner P. Cognitive impairment following traumatic brain injury. Current Treatment Options in Neurology 2002; 4: 43–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flanagan SR, Cantor JB, Ashman TA. Traumatic brain injury: Future assessment tools and treatment prospects. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2008; 4: 877–892
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychological Review 2003; 13: 181–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Burr R. Improving the ecological validity of the executive functioning assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 217–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbordone RJ. Limitations of neuropsychological testing to predict the cognitive and behavioral functioning of persons with brain injury in real-world settings. NeuroRehabilitation 2001; 16: 199–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbordone RJ. The ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. The neuropsychology handbook: Foundations and assessment, AMJ Horton, D Wedding, J Webster. Springer Publishing Company, New York 1997; 365–392
   Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychological Review 2003; 13: 181–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Liossi C. The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 429–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupper D, Cicerone K. Introduction to the neuropsychology of everyday life. The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies, D Tupper, KD Cicerone. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA 1990; 3–18
   Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975; 1: 480–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend W. Relationship between Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) and the EQ-5D health status questionnaire after head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2001; 70: 267–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Naalt J. Prediction of outcome in mild to moderate head injury: A review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001; 23: 837–851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State University of New York at Buffalo Research Foundation. Guide for use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation: Functional Independence Measure. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo Research Foundation; (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Coster WJ, Haley SM, Ludlow LH, Andres PL, Ni P-S. Development of an applied cognition scale to measure rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 2030–2035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Coster WJ, Andres PL, Ludlow LH, Ni P, Bond TL, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Medical Care 2004; 42(1 Suppl)49–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Iverson GL, Barth JT, Bush SS, Broshek DK. Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: A National Academy of Neuropsychology Education Paper. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2009; 24: 3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF, ed. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian J. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct?. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2003; 35: 145–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLisa JA. Shaping the future of medical rehabilitation research: Using the interdisciplinary research model. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 531–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Nochajski SM, Stone J. The international classification of functioning, disability and health and its application to cognitive disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 235–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook KF, Crane PK, Teresi JA, Thissen D, Revicki DA, Weiss DJ, Hambleton RK, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care 2007; 45(5 Suppl 1)22–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki DA, Gnanasakthy A, Weinfurt K. Documenting the rationale and psychometric characteristics of patient reported outcomes for labeling and promotional claims: The PRO Evidence Dossier. Quality of Life Research 2007; 16: 717–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doward LC, McKenna SP. Defining patient-reported outcomes. Value in Health 2004; 7(Suppl 1)S4–S8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arpinelli F, Bamfi F. The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: The point of view of a pharmaceutical company. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries JF, Bruce B, Bjorner JB, Rose M. More relevant, precise, and efficient items for assessment of physical function and disability: Moving beyond the classic instruments. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2007; 65(Suppl III)iii16–iii21
   Google Scholar
• Chan RC, Bode RK. Analysis of patient and proxy ratings on the Dysexecutive Questionnaire: An application of Rasch analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2008; 79: 86–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott D, Lazarus R, Leeder SR. Proxy respondents reliably assessed the quality of life of elective cardiac surgery patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2006; 59: 153–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneeuw KCA, Sprangers MAG, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002; 55: 1130–1143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2005; 23(5 Suppl 39)53–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn EA, Cella D, Bode RK, Gershon R, Lai JS. Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations. Medical Care 2006; 44(11 Suppl 3)189–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook KF, Teal CR, Bjorner JB, Cella D, Chang C-H, Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Hays RD, McHorney CA, Ocepek-Welikson K, et al. IRT health outcomes data analysis project: An overview and summary. Quality of Life Research 2007; 16: 121–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Rockville, MD: U.S.H.a.H. Services; 2009. p 37.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA. Generic health measurement: Past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997; 127: 743–750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velozo CA, Kielhofner G, Lai J-S. The use of Rasch analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 56: 83–90
   Google Scholar
• Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, Roddey TS. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: Time to let the CAT out of the bag?. Health Services Research 2005; 40: 1694–1711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Gershon R, Lai JS, Choi S. The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research 2007; 16(Suppl 1)133–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirsky AF, Anthony BJ, Duncan CC, Ahearn MB, Kellam SG. Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychology Review 1991; 2: 109–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function® (BRIEF®). Psychological Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 1996
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano G, Schacter D. Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues. Oxford University Press, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay JA, Friel J. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 1643–1650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne KS, Tubaro A, Brubaker L, Bavendam T. Development and validation of patient-reported outcomes measures for overactive bladder. A review of concepts. Urology 2006; 68(Suppl 2A)9–16
   Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The Test of Everyday Attention (TEA). Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St EdmundsUK 1994
   Google Scholar
• Bittner RM, Crowe SF. The relationship between working memory, processing speed, verbal comprehension and FAS performance following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 709–719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantin JF, McFadyen BJ, Doyon J, Swaine B, Dumas D, Vallée MC. Can measures of cognitive function predict locomotor behaviour in complex environments following a traumatic brain injury?. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 327–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders J, Boonstra T. Correlates of invalid neuropsychological test performance after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 319–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon-Carrion J, Leal-Cerro A, Cabezas FM, Atutxa AM, Gomez SG, Cordero JM, Moreno AS, Ferrari MD, Dominguez-Morales MR. Cognitive deterioration due to GH deficiency in patients with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary report. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 871–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe FM, Dockree PM, Moloney P, Carton S, Robertson IH. Characterising error-awareness of attentional lapses and inhibitory control failures in patients with traumatic brain injury. Experimental Brain Research 2007; 180: 59–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibel RS, Newsome MR, Steinberg JL, Pearson DA, Rauch RA, Mao H, Troyanskaya M, Sharma RG, Levin HS. Altered brain activation during cognitive control in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2007; 21: 36–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden SC, Shores EA, Mathias JL. Does effort suppress cognition after traumatic brain injury? A re-examination of the evidence for the Word Memory Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006; 20: 858–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himanen L, Portin R, Isoniem IH, Helenius H, Kurki T, Tenovuo O. Longitudinal cognitive changes in traumatic brain injury: A 30-year follow-up study. Neurology 2006; 66: 187–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-H, Ko M-H, Park S-H, Kim K-W. Effects of single-dose methylphenidate on cognitive performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20: 24–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landre N, Poppe CJ, Davis N, Schmaus B, Hobbs SE. Cognitive functioning and postconcussive symptoms in trauma patients with and without mild TBI. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 255–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapert S, Houx P, de Kruijk J, Ponds R, Jolles J. Neurocognitive fitness in the sub-acute stage after mild TBI: The effect of age. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 161–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson AG, Lundin R, Parkinson RB, Tate DF, Victoroff J, Hopkins RO, Bigler ED. Clinical rating of cortical atrophy and cognitive correlates following traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2004; 18: 509–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah YM, Maybery MT, Fox AM. The long-term effects of mild head injury on short-term memory for visual form, spatial location, and their conjunction in well-functioning university students. Brain and Cognition 2004; 56: 304–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe FM, Dockree PM, Robertson IH. Poor insight in traumatic brain injury mediated by impaired error processing? Evidence from electrodermal activity. Cognitive and Brain Research 2004; 22: 101–112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rios M, Perianez JA, Munoz-Cespedes JM. Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 257–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JE, Clement PF, Curtiss G. WAIS-III processing speed index scores after TBI: The influence of working memory, psychomotor speed and perceptual processing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2003; 17: 303–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milders M, Ietswaart M, Crawford JR, Currie D. Social behavior following traumatic brain injury and its association with emotion recognition, understanding of intentions, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 14: 318–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe F, Dockree PM, Moloney P, Carton S, Robertson IH. Awareness of deficits in traumatic brain injury: A multidimensional approach to assessing metacognitive knowledge and online-awareness. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007; 13: 38–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Draper K, Schonberger M. Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: Its relationship with demographic, injury severity, and cognitive and emotional status. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 14: 233–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg ND, Hanks RA, McKay C. Cognitive estimation in traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2007; 13: 898–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantagallo A, Carli S, Simone A, Tesio L. MINDFIM: A measure of disability in high-functioning traumatic brain injury outpatients. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 913–925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir SO, Altinok N, Aydin G, Koseoglu F. Functional and cognitive progress in aphasic patients with traumatic brain injury during post-acute phase. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1383–1390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Monte VE, GGeffen GM, Massavelli BM. The effects of post-traumatic amnesia on information processing following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1345–1354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport MJ, Herrmann N, Shammi P, Kiss A, Phillips A, Feinstein A. Outcome after traumatic brain injury sustained in older adulthood: A one-year longitudinal study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2006; 14: 456–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz TW, Rowley HA, Kawahara TN, Johnson SC. Neural correlates of self-evaluative accuracy after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44: 762–773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinidou F, Thomas RD, Scharp VL, Laske KM, Hammerly MD, Guitonde S. Effects of categorization training in patients with TBI during postacute rehabilitation: Preliminary findings. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 143–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Whyte J, Kim J, Vaccaro M. Executive function and self-awareness of “real-world” behavior and attention deficits following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20: 333–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight RG, Harnett M, Titov N. The effects of traumatic brain injury on the predicted and actual performance of a test of prospective remembering. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Rao SL, Nair RG, Pillai S, Chandramouli BA, Subbakrishna DK. Sensory gating impairment in development of post-concussive symptoms in mild head injury. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2005; 59: 466–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAvinue L, O'Keeffe F, McMackin D, Robertson IH. Impaired sustained attention and error awareness in traumatic brain injury: Implications for insight. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2005; 15: 569–587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noé E, Ferri J, Caballero MC, Villodre R, Sanchez A, Chirivella J. Self-awareness after acquired brain injury: Predictors and rehabilitation. Journal of Neurology 2005; 252: 168–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiersky LA, Anselmi V, Johnston MV, Kurtyka J, Roosen E, Schwartz T, Deluca J. A trial of neuropsychologic rehabilitation in mild-spectrum traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005; 86: 1565–1574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverover Y. Categorization, deductive reasoning, and self-awareness: Association with everyday competence in persons with acute brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2004; 26: 737–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, Corrigan JD, Rosenthal M, Bushnik T, Shull W. Five years after traumatic brain injury: A study of individual outcomes and predictors of change in function. NeuroRehabilitation 2004; 19: 25–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias JL, Beall JA, Bigler ED. Neuropsychological and information processing deficits following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004; 10: 286–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikman SS, Machamer JE, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 1449–1457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangels JA, Craik FI, Levine B, Schwartz ML, Stuss DT. Effects of divided attention on episodic memory in chronic traumatic brain injury: A function of severity and strategy. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 2369–2385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quemada JI, Muñoz Céspedes JM, Ezkerra J, Ballesteros J, Ibarra N, Urruticoechea I. Outcome of memory rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury assessed by neuropsychological tests and questionnaires. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 532–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch M. Information processing and the cerebral hemispheres. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, MS Gazzaniga. Plenum Press, New York 1979; 2
   Google Scholar
• D'Zurilla TJ, Nezu AM. Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention, 2nd. Springer, New York 1999
   Google Scholar
• Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. Tavistock, London 1966
   Google Scholar
• Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Lutz, FL 2000
   Google Scholar
• Stuss DT, Benson DF. The frontal lobes. Raven Press, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• D'Zurilla TJ, Nezu AM, Maydeau-Olivares A. Social Problem Solving Inventory (SPSI). Multi-Health Systems, Inc., North Tonowanda, NY 2002
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive Rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman D. What makes a leader?. Harvard Business Review Nov–Dec, 1998; 93–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar