Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the network form of organization of traumatic brain injury service delivery systems

References

• Cope DN, Mayer N, Cervelli L. Development of systems of care for persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 20(2)128–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasler ND, Devany Serio C. Model systems continuum of care for traumatic brain injury in rehabilitation of the injured combatant. Office of the Surgeon General, Departement of the Army, United States of America, Bethesda, MD 2002
   Google Scholar
• Ragnarsson KT. Model systems of care for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8(2)1–11
   Google Scholar
• Commitee on Brain Injury. Service needs and sources of funding and support for people with TBI-related disabilities in evaluating the HSRA traumatic brain injury program. The National Academies Press, Washington 2006
   Google Scholar
• Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Langlois JA, Selassie AW. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the united states, 2005. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2008; 23(6)394–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management 2003; 29(6)991–1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goowdin N, 6 P, Peck E, Freeman T, Posaner R. Managing across diverse networks of care: Lessons from other sectors. London: NCCSDO
   Google Scholar
• Kenis P, Provan KG. Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration 2009; 87(3)440–456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury MJ. Integrated service networks: The Québec case. Health Services Management Research 2006; 19(3)153–165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleury MJ. Quebec mental health services networks: Models and implementation. International Journal of Intergrated Care 2005; 5: e07
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keast R, Mandell MP, Brown K, Woolcock G. Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review 2004; 64(3)363–371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Milward HB. A premilinary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: A comparative study of four community health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 1995; 40(1)1–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W. Taking stock of network and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 2004; 47(6)795–817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Milward HB. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 2001; 61(4)414–423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J. The new wave of service integration. Social Service Review 1997; 71(3)463–484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutz WN. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: Lessons from the united states and the united kingdom. Milbank Quarterly 1999; 77(1)77–110, iv–v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta T, Casebeer A, VanderPlatt M. Using networks to enhance health services delivery: Perspectives, paradoxes and proposition. HealthcarePapers 2006; 7(2)18–26
   Google Scholar
• Gröne O, Garcia-Barbera M, Integrated care: A position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Care Services. International Journal of Intergrated Care. 2001:1, e1
   Google Scholar
• Fleury M-J, Mercier C. Integrated local networks as a model for organizing mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 2002; 30(1)55–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleury MJ, Mercier C, Denis JL. Regional planning implementation and its impact on integration of a mental health care network. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 2002; 17(4)315–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huerta TR, Casebeer A, Vander Plaat M. Using networks to enhance helath services delivery: Perspectives, paradox and propositions. Healthcarepapers 2006; 7(2)10–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vander Laan R, Brandys C, Sullivan I, Lemsky C. Integration through a city-wide brain injury network and best practices project. Neurorehabilitation 2001; 16: 17–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePompei R, Frye D, DuFore M, Hunt P. Traumatic brain injury collaborative planning group: A protocol for community intervention. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001; 16(3)217–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK, Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Applied Sociological Research Methods Series. 2008
   Google Scholar
• Lamontagne ME, Les Consortiums d’Établissements Offrant des Services aux Personnes Ayant Subi un Traumatisme Craniocérébral: Étude de Cas et Proposition d’une Hiérarchisation des Dimensions de Leur Performance Thesis, Université de Montréal; 2011. 258 p. Available from Papyrus:papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/jspui/
   Google Scholar
• Gordon J, Hazlett C, Ten Cate O, Mann K, Kilminster S, Prince K, O'Driscoll E, Snell L, Newble D. Strategic planning in medical education: Enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings. Medical Education 2000; 34(10)841–850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce C. Ten steps to carrying out a swot analysis. Nursing Management 2007; 14(2)25
   Google Scholar
• Camden C, Swaine B, Tetreault S, Bergeron S. Swot analysis of a pediatric rehabilitation programme: A participatory evaluation fostering quality improvement. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009; 31(16)1373–1381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casebeer A. Application of swot analysis. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 1993; 49(6)430–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Bhatia G. The voluntary community health movement in India: A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Journal of Community Health 1996; 21(6)453–464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen T, Lahti S, Leino-Kilpi H. Applicability of swot analysis for measuring quality of public oral health services as perceived by adult patients in finland: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1999; 27(5)386–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CM, Petrelli J, Murphy M. Development and implementation of a geriatric care/case management program in a military community-based family medicine residency. Military Medicine 2000; 165(11)809–815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. London: SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP, Picot-Touché J, Béland F, Nguyen H, Un cadre d’évaluation de la performance des systèmes de services de santé: le modèle EGIPSS. Montréal: GRIS Secteur santé publique. Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal. 30 juin 2004
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311(6997)109–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamontagne M-E, Swaine B, Lavoie A, Champagne F, Marcotte A-C. Consensus group sessions are useful to reconcile stakeholders's perspectives about network performance evaluation. International Journal of Intergrated Care. 2010:10, e1
   Google Scholar
• Lamontagne ME, Swaine BR, Lavoie A, Champagne F, Marcotte AC. Perceptions of traumatic brain injury network participants about network performance. Brain Injury 2010; 24(6)812–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bente JR. Performance measurement, health care policy, and implications for rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation Psychology 2005; 50(1)87–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard M, Davies HT, Dawson D, Mannion R, McInnes F. Clinical performance measurement, part 1: Getting the best out of it. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2002; 95(10)508–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The desing and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review 2006; 66: 44–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzoli GJ. Community-based trauma system development: Key barriers and facilitating factors. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care 1999; 47(3 Suppl)S22–S24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazzoli GJ, Casey E, Alexander JA, Conrad DA, Shortell SM, Sofaer S, Hasnain-Wynia R, Zukoski AP. Collaborative initiatives: Where the rubber meets the road in community partnerships. Medical Care Research and Review 2003; 60(4 Suppl)63S–94S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell MP, Keast R. Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganisational relations through networks: Developing a framework for revised performance measure. Public Administration Review 2008; 10(6)715–731
   Google Scholar
• Van Raaij D. Norms network members use: An alternative perspective for indicating network success or failure. International Public Management Journal 2006; 9(3)249–270
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: A multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003; 327(7425)1219–1221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar