538
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Differences in social participation between individuals who do and do not attend brain injury drop-in centres: A preliminary study

, MSc, BSc(OT), , &
Pages 83-94 | Received 29 Jan 2011, Accepted 22 Oct 2011, Published online: 07 Dec 2011

References

  • Stålnacke B. Community integration, social support and life satisfaction in relation to symptoms 3 years after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 933–942
  • Selassie AW, Zaloshnja E, Langlois JA, Miller T, Jones P, Steiner C. Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2008; 23: 123–131
  • van Velzen J, van Bennekom C, Edelaar M, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen M. How many people return to work after acquired brain injury? A systematic review. Brain Injury 2009; 23: 473–488
  • Jumisko E, Lexell J, Söderberg S. The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosciences Nursing 2005; 37: 42–50
  • Kersel DA, Marsh NV, Havill JH, Sleigh JW. Psychosocial functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 683–696
  • Tomberg T, Toomela A, Ennok M, Tikk A. Changes in coping strategies, social support, optimism and health-related quality of life following traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 479–488
  • Hawthorne G, Gruen RL, Kaye AH. Traumatic brain injury and long-term quality of life: Findings from an Australian study. Journal of Neurotrauma 2009; 26: 1623–1633
  • Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10–20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 189–209
  • Kalpakjian CZ, Lam CS, Toussaint LL, Merbitz N. Describing quality of life and psychosocial outcomes after traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 83: 255–265
  • McLean A, Dikmen SS, Temkin NR. Psychosocial recovery after head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 74: 1041–1046
  • McCabe P, Lippert C, Weiser M, Hilditch M, Hartridge C, Villamere J. Community reintegration following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 231–257
  • Geurtsen GJ, van Heugten CM, Martina JD, Geurts ACH. Comprehensive rehabilitation programmes in the chronic phase after severe brain injury: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2010; 42: 97–110
  • Cullen N, Chundamala J, Bayley M, Jutai J. The efficacy of acquired brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 113–132
  • Morton MV, Wehman P. Psychosocial and emotional sequelae of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A literature review and recommendations. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 81–92
  • Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Mellick D, Harrison-Felix C, Terrill MS, Noble K. Population-based estimates of outcomes after hospitalization for traumatic brain injury in Colorado. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85: 73–81
  • Eriksson G, Tham K, Borg J. Occupational gaps in everyday life 1–4 years after acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2006; 38: 159–165
  • Huebner RA, Johnson K, Bennett CM, Schneck C. Community participation and quality of life outcomes after adult traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2003; 57: 177–185
  • Brown M, Gordon WA, Haddad L. Models for predicting subjective quality of life in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 5–19
  • Ownsworth T, McFarland K. Investigation of psychological and neuropsychological factors associated with clinical outcome following a group rehabilitation programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 535–562
  • Hibbard MR, Cantor J, Charatz H, Rosenthal R, Ashman T, Gundersen N, Ireland-Knight L, Gordon W, Avner J, Gartner A. Peer support in the community: Initial findings of a mentoring program for individuals with traumatic brain injury and their families. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 112–131
  • Kuipers P, Kennedy A, Smith S. Networks of support: Adapting the ‘Circles’ approach to formal community based acquired brain injury rehabilitation. Journal of Cognitive Rehabilitation 1999; 17: 6–9
  • Fraas M, Balz M, DeGrauw W. Meeting the long-term needs of adults with acquired brain injury through community-based programming. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 1267–1281
  • Johnson K, Davis PK. A supported relationships intervention to increase the social integration of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Behavior Modification 1998; 22: 502–528
  • Douglas JM, Dyson M, Foreman P. Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: Does it make a difference?. Brain Impairment 2006; 7: 107–118
  • Powell J, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2002; 72: 193–202
  • Evans L, Brewis C. The efficacy of community-based rehabilitation programmes for adults with TBI. Including commentary by Thomas Y. International Journal of Rehabilitation 2008; 15: 446–458
  • What is a Clubhouse [internet]. Available online at: http://www.braininjuryclubhouses.net/clubhouse.aspx, accessed 5 August 2011
  • Jacobs HE. The Clubhouse: Addressing work related behavioral challenges through a supportive social community. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1997; 12: 14–27
  • Teasell R, Cullen N, Marshall S, Bayley M, Aubut J, Meyers M, Tu L, Comper P, Chundamala J, Bayona N, Chapter 1: introduction and methodology. Evidence-based review of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. 4th ed. 2008. Available online at: http://www.abiebr.com/modules/modules/1_4_assets/module1.pdf, accessed 25 October 2008
  • Classification of coma, concussion and traumatic brain injury [Internet]. Available online at: http://cpancf.com.headinjuryclassification.asp, 26 October 2008
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
  • Zung WW. Factors influencing the self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry 1967; 16: 543–547
  • Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30: 473–483
  • Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Garratt AM, Coutts A, Russell IT. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies. Quality in Health Care 1994; 3: 180–185
  • Findler M, Cantor J, Haddad L, Gordon W, Ashman T. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 715–723
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2005; 53: 695–699
  • Olson RA, Chhanabhai T, McKenzie M. Feasibility study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 1273–1278
  • Grace M, Malloy PF. Frontal Systems Behavior Scale professional manual. Pyschological Assessment Resources Inc., Lutz, Florida 2001
  • Malloy P, Grace J. A review of rating scales for measuring behavior change due to frontal systems damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology 2005; 18: 18–27
  • Fischer J, Corcoran K. Measures for clinical practice and research: A sourcebook, 4th. Oxford University Press, New York 2007
  • Malec JF, Kragness M, Evans RW, Finlay KL, Kent A, Lezak MD. Further psychometric evaluation and revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a national sample. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2003; 18: 479–492
  • Malec JF. Comparability of Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 563–575
  • Minnes P, Carlson P, McColl MA, Nolte ML, Johnston J, Buell K. Community integration: A useful construct, but what does it really mean?. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 149–159
  • Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 75–87
  • Corrigan JD, Deming R. Psychometric characteristics of the community integration questionnaire: Replication and extension. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1995; 10: 41–53
  • Sander AM, Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, Hall KM, High W, Jr, Rosenthal M. Agreement between persons with traumatic brain injury and their relatives regarding psychosocial outcome using the community integration questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1997; 78: 353–357
  • Cutrona CE, Russell DW. The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships. 1987; 1: 37–67
  • Driver S. Social support and the physical activity behaviours of people with a brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1067–1075
  • Jarus T, Barnea R, Wasserlauf N, Boretz L, Yekuel S, Galon I, Peleg L, Greenbaum S. The Israeli assessment of participation for adults [Hebrew]. Israeli Journal of Occupational Therapy 2006; 15: 62–63
  • Huberty CJ, Morris JD. Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin 1989; 105: 302–308
  • Cohen JW, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. As cited in: Pallant J. SPSS Survival manual. 3rd ed. NY: Open University Press; 2007
  • Shrive FM, Stuart H, Quan H, Ghali WA. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: A comparison of imputation methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006; 6: 57–66
  • Glover A. An exploration of the extent to which attending Headway enhances quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 750–760
  • Leith KH, Phillips L, Sample PL. Exploring the service needs and experiences of persons with TBI and their families: The South Carolina experience. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 1191–1208
  • Lefebvre H, Cloutier G, Levert MJ. Perspectives of survivors of traumatic brain injury and their caregivers on long-term social integration. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 535–543
  • Dijkers M, Gordon W. Should we do more research on treatments after traumatic brain injury?. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 409–410
  • Gordon WA, Zafonte R, Cicerone K, Cantor J, Brown M, Lombard L, Goldsmith R, Chandna T. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: State of the science. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006; 85: 343–382
  • Pickelsimer EE, Selassie AW, Sample PL, Heinemann AW, Gu JK, Veldheer LC. Unmet service needs of persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007; 22: 1–13
  • Heinemann AW, Sokol K, Garvin L, Bode RK. Measuring unmet needs and services among persons with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002; 83: 1052–1059

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.