Upper-limb virtual rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: A preliminary within-group evaluation of the elements system

References

• Wilson PH, Thomas P, Shum D, Duckworth J, Gugliemetti M, Rudolph H, Mumford N, Eldridge R, A multilevel model for movement rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) using Virtual Environments. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. New York, USA, August 29–30 2006
   Google Scholar
• Mumford N, Duckworth J, Thomas P, Shum D, Williams G, Wilson PH. Upper limb virtual rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: Initial evaluation of the Elements System. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 780–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States, March 2010. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/TraumaticBrainInjury/pdf/blue_book.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walker WC, Pickett TC. Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multicenter study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2007; 44: 975–982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea PH, Eng JJ, Hodgson AJ. Biomechanics of reaching: Clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 534–541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B. Traumatic brain injury. Comprehensive clinical psychology, AS Bellack, M Hersen. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford 1998; 463–486
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo AA, Schultheis MT, Kerns KA, Mateer C. Analysis of assets for virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2004; 14: 207–239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson A, Korner-Bittensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2007; 14: 52–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall S, Teasell R, Bayona N, Lippert C, Chundamala J, Villamere J, Mackie D, Cullen N, Bayley M. Motor impairment rehabilitation post acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2007; 21: 133–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeorge P, Philips L, Crawford J, Garden S, Della-Sala S, Hamilton S, Callender J. Using virtual environments in the assessment of executive dysfunction. Presence 2001; 10: 375–383
   Google Scholar
• Matheis RJ, Schultheis MT, Tiersky LA, DeLuca J, Millis SR, Rizzo A. Is learning and memory different in a virtual environment?. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2007; 21: 146–161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald J, Liu L, Reil S. Concurrent validity of a virtual reality driving assessment for persons with brain injury. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2000; 3: 643–654
   Google Scholar
• Schultheis MT, Mourant RR. Virtual reality and driving: The road to better assessment for cognitively impaired populations. Presence 2001; 10: 431–439
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Abreu BC, Masel B, Scheibel RS, Christiansen C, Huddleston N, Ottenbacher KJ. Virtual reality in the assessment of selected cognitive function after brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2001; 80: 597–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveistrup H, McComas J, Thornton M, Marshall S, Finestone H, McCormick A, Babulic K. Experimental studies of virtual reality-delivered compared to conventional exercise programs for rehabilitation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2003; 6: 245–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grealy MA, Johnson D, Rushton SK. Improving cognitive function after brain injury: The use of exercise and virtual reality. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999; 80: 661–667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford N, Duckworth J, Thomas PR, Shum D, Williams G, Wilson PH. Upper limb virtual rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: Initial evaluation of the Elements system. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 780–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin CJ. Research in psychology: Methods and design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell ML, Jolley JM. Research design explained, 6th. Thomson Higher Education, Belmont, CA 2007
   Google Scholar
• Cook L, Rumrill PD. Internal validity in rehabilitation research. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 2005; 25: 279–283
   Google Scholar
• Bordens KS, Abbott BB. Research design and methods: A process approach. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York 2008
   Google Scholar
• Walker A, Onus M, Doyle M, Clare J, McCarthy K. Cognitive rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A pilot programme of goal planning and outdoor adventure course participation. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1237–1241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming JM, Lucas SE, Lightbody S. Using occupation to facilitate self-awareness in people who have acquired brain injury: A pilot study. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2006; 73: 44–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw SE, Morris DM, Uswatte G, McKay S, Meythaler JM, Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy for recovery of upper-limb function following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2005; 42: 769–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese H, Stude P, Nebel K, Osenberg D, Ischebeck W, Stolke D, Diener HC, Keidel M. Recovery of movement-related potentials in the temporal course after prefrontal traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004; 15: 2677–2692
   Google Scholar
• Albensi BC, Janigro D. Traumatic brain injury and its effects on synaptic plasticity. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 653–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamovich S, Merians A, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Recce M, Poizner H. A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke: Transfer to function. San Francisco, CA: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2004. IEMBS '04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. pp. 4936–4939.
   Google Scholar
• Boian R, Sharma A, Han C, Merians A, Burdea G, Adamovich S, Reece M, Tremaine M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. IOS Press, Newport Beach, CA 2002; 64–70
   Google Scholar
• Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2001; 9: 308–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuttuva M, Boian R, Merians A, Burdea GC, Bouzit M, Lewis J, Fensterheim D. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: A pilot study. CyberPsychology & Behaviour 2006; 9: 148–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden M, Dyar T. Virtual environment training: A new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurology Report 2002; 26: 62–72
   Google Scholar
• Holden M, Platz T, Dyar T, Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environmnet improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2007; 15: 36–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L, Zucconi C, Dam M, Massaro C, Tonin P, Atzori A, Trivello E. The augmented-feedback rehabilitation technique facilitates the arm motor recovery in patients after a recent stroke. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2003; 94: 265–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Piccione F, Laia V, Trivello E, Dam M. Virtual environment training therapy for arm motor rehabilitation. Presence 2005; 14: 732–740
   Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tombolini P, Turolla A, Zucconi C, Agostini M, Dam M, Santarello G, Piccione F, Tonin P, Reinforced feedback in virtual environment facilitates the arm motor recovery in patients after a recent stroke. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation. Venice, Italy, September 27–29, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, Battistin L, Dam M. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 2004; 29: 119–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden M, Dettwiler A, Dyar T, Niemann G, Bizzi E, Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. In: Westwood JD, editor. Medicine meets virtual reality: IO Press; 2001. p 192–198
   Google Scholar
• Holden M, Dyar T, Callahan J, Schwamm L, Bizzi E. Quantitative assessment of motor generalization in the real world following training in a virtual environment in patients with stroke. Neurology Report 2001; 25: 129–130
   Google Scholar
• Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, Bizzi E. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: Case report. Neurology Report 1999; 23: 57
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Bialocerkowski AE, Grimmer KA, Bain GI. Validity of the patient-focused wrist outcome instrument: Do impairments represent functional ability?. Hand Clinics 2003; 19: 449–455
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karnezis IA, Fragkiadakis EG. Association between objective clinical variables and patient-rated disability of the wrist. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – Series B 2002; 84: 967–970
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox J, Spaulding S, Kramer J. Is there a relationship between hand strength and hand function?. Journal of Hand Therapy 2006; 19: 444–445
   Google Scholar
• Triffitt P. The relationship between motion of the shoulder and the stated ability to perform activities of daily living. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – Series A 1998; 80: 41–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001; 8: 648–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov E, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior 1997; 29: 147–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York 2007
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Hebert R, Bravo G. The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test: Reliability, validity and reference values studies with healthy elderly people. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1997; 64: 270–276
   Google Scholar
• Seidler R, Noll DC, Thiers G. Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control. NeuroImage 2004; 22: 1775–1783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastridge D, Mozzoni MP. Fluency and functional motor skills following brain injury. Behavioral Interventions 2005; 20: 77–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarron L. McCarron assessment of neuromuscular development: Fine and gross motor abilities. McCarron-Dial Systems inc., Dallas, TX 1997
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Steel RT, Marwitz JH. Neurobehavioral functioning inventory: Manual. Harcourt Brace & Company, San Antonio, TX 1999
   Google Scholar
• Castaneda MB, Levin JR, Dunham RB. Using planned comparisons in management research: A case for the Bonferroni Procedure. Journal of Management 1993; 19: 707–724
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992; 112: 155–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua KS, Ng Y, Yap SG, Bok C. A brief review of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. The Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2007; 36: 31–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan S. Traumatic brain injury: A review. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly 2005; 28: 188–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Platz T, VanWijck F, Jonhnson G. ARM: Arm rehabilitation measurement. Deutscher Wissenshafts-Verlag, Baden-Baden 2005
   Google Scholar
• Herbet R, Carr R, Bilodeau A. The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and Ageing 1988; 17: 293–302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Platz T, Pinkowski C, VanWijck F, Kim I, Bella PD, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: A multicentre study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2005; 19: 404–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller SM, Liu W, Whitall J. Temporal and spatial control following bilateral versus unilateral training. Human Movement Science 2008; 27: 749–758
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden M. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2005; 8: 187–211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weigelt M, Rosenbaum DA, Huelshorst S, Schack T. Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall. Acta Psychologica 2009; 132: 68–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden A, Boschian K, Eker C, Schalen W, Nordstrom CH. Assessment of motor and process skills reflects brain-injured patients ability to resume independent living better than neuropsychological tests. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2005; 111: 48–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoofien D, Vakil E, Gilboa A, Donovick PEJ, Barak O. Comparison of the predictive power of socioeconomic variables, severity of injury and age on long-term outcome of traumatic brain injury: Sample-specific variables versus factors as predictors. Brain Injury 2002; 16: 9–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toschlog EA, Macelligot J, Sargraves SG, Schenarts PJ, Bard MR, Goettler CE, Rotondo MF, Wanson MS. The relationship of Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score to rehabilitative potential in patients suffering traumatic brain injury. The American Surgeon 2003; 69: 491–498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford JL, Draper K, Schönberger M. Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: Its relationship with demographic, injury severity, cognitive and emotional status. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008; 14: 233–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DI, Alexander MP, Klein RB. Recovery of arm function in patients with paresis after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 488–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 1449–1457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper K, Ponsford J. Cognitive functioning ten years following traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation. Neuropsychology 2008; 22: 618–625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 841– 848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andelic N, Hammergren N, Bautz-Holter E, Sveen U, Brunborg C, Røe C. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life 10 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2008; 120: 16–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mumford N, Duckworth J, Eldridge R, Guglielmetti M, Thomas P, Shum D, Rudolph H, Williams G, Wilson PH, A virtual tabletop workspace for upper-limb rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): A multiple case study evaluation. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation. Vancouver, Canada, August 25–27, 2008
   Google Scholar