A comparison of two assessments of high level cognitive communication disorders in mild traumatic brain injury

References

• Malojcic B, Mubrin Z, Coric B, Susnic M, Spilich GJ. Consequences of mild traumatic brain injury on information processing assessed with attention and short-term memory tasks. Journal of Neurotrauma 2008; 25: 30–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeron E, Clas D, Messier D, Pintal L, Mawn J, Godbout D, Coallier S, Martin M. Implementing a routine screening program in the acute care setting for mild traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Trauma 2003; 29: 85–91
   Google Scholar
• Hart T, Millis S, Novack T, Englander J, Fidler-Sheppard R, Bell K. The relationship between neuropsychologic function and level of caregiver supervision at 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 221–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shames J, Treger I, Ring H, Giaquinto S. Return to work following traumatic brain injury: Trends and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation 2007; 29: 1387–1395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, McDonald S, Lulham JM. Incidence of hospital-treated traumatic brain injury in an Australian community. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2008; 22: 419–423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Iverson GL, Barth JT, Bush SS, Broshek DK, The NAN, Policy and Planning Committee. Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: A national academy of Neuropsychology education paper. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2009;24:1–8
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Wintermark M, Gean AD, Ghajar J, Manley GT, Mukherjee P. Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI. Journal of Neurotrauma 2008; 25: 1049–1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff M, Proctor A, Haley K. Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): Assessment and treatment procedures used by speech- language pathologists (SLPs). Brain Injury 2002; 16: 773–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Willmott C, Rothwell A, Cameron P, Kelly A, Nelms R, Curran C, Ng K. Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2000; 6: 568–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg W, Strauman S. Diagnosis of mild head injury and the postconcussion syndrome. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 783–791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Blanc J, de Guise E, Feyz M, Lamoureux J. Early prediction of language impairment following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 20: 1391–1401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Theodoros G. Linguistic deficits in adults subsequent to traumatic brain injury. Traumatic brain injury: Associated speech, language and swallowing disorders, BE Murdoch, DG Theodoros. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA 2001; 199–222
   Google Scholar
• Whelan BM, Murdoch BE. The impact of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) on language function: More than meets the eye?. Brain and Language 2006; 99: 171–172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Szekeres SF, Feeney T. Communication disorders associated with closed head injury. Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia, R Chapey. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 2000; 745–808
   Google Scholar
• Bara BG, Cutica I, Tirassa M. Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication after closed head injury. Brain and Language 2001; 77: 72–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller J, Kiernan R, Langston J. Cognistat manual. Northern California Neurobehavioral Group, Inc., Fairfax, CA 2007
   Google Scholar
• Morarty J, The development of a clinical protocol for the management of mild head injuries. Poster presentation at The 6th World Congress on Brain Injury; Melbourne, Australia; May 2005
   Google Scholar
• Nabors NA, Millis SR, Rosenthal M. Use of the Neurobehavioural Cogntive Status Examination (Cognistat) in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabiliation 1997; 12: 79–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger NA, Bode RK, Ehde DM, Knight K, Bombardier CH. Measurement properties of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (Cognistat) in traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2006; 51: 281–288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger N, Bode R, Heinemann A, Ambrose C. Rating scale analysis of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabiliation 2000; 15: 683–695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test. Examiner's manual. The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Assessment Company, San Antonio, TexasUSA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Lynch WJ. Assessment in traumatic brain injury: Update on recent developments. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2002; 17: 66–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgaro SR, Prigatano GP, Kwasnica C, Rexer JL. Cognitive and affective sequelae in complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 189–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marosszeky NEV, Ryan L, Shores EA, Batchelor J, Marosszeky JE. The PTA Protocol: Guidelines for using the Westmead Post-Traumatic Amnesia (PTA) Scale. Wild & Wooley, Sydney 1997
   Google Scholar