Test–re-test reliability of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised in individuals with traumatic brain injury

References

• Baddeley A, Harris S. Closed head injury and memory. Neurobehavioral recovery from head injury, HS Levin, J Grafman, HM Eisenberg. Oxford University Press, New York 1987; 295–315
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Benton A, Grossman RG. Neurobehavioral consequences of closed head injury. Oxford University Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Consensus conference. Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999;282:974–983
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM. External aids for management of memory impairment. Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury, W High, AM Sander, MA Struchen, KA Hart. Oxford University Press, New York 2005; 47–70
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay W, Watkiss AJ. Cognitive and behavioral effect of brain injury. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury3rd, M Rosenthal, ER Griffith, J Kreutzer, B Pentland. F.A. Davies, Philadelphia, PA 1999; 74–116
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: A neuropsychological perspective. Guilford Press, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Ryan TB, Sautter SW, Capps CF, Meneese W, Barth JT. Utilizing neuropsychological measures to predict vocational outcome in a head trauma population. Brain Injury 1992; 6: 175–182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy M. Managing memory and metamemory impairment in individuals with traumatic brain injury. ASHA Leader 2006; 11: 34–36
   Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after closed head injury: A further follow-up seven years after injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 564–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter DL, Crovitz HF. Memory function after closed head injury: A review of the quantitative research. Cortex 1977; 13: 150–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, O’Neil-Pirozzi T, Morita C. Clinician expectations for portable electronic devices as cognitive-behavioural orthoses in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 401–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Kendrick H, Goldstein R, Glenn M. Clinician influences on use of portable electronic memory devices in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 179–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt J, Benedict RHB. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Lutz, FL 2001
   Google Scholar
• Brandt J. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test: Development of a new memory test with sixequivalent forms. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1991; 5: 125–142
   Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB, Schretlen D, Groninger L, Brandt J. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised: Normative data and analysis of interform and test-retest reliability. Clinical Neuropsychologist 1998; 12: 43–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussan DX, Bylsma FW, Brandt J. Stability of performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. Archives of Neuropsychology 1995; 10: 21–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinberg WJ, Review of the Hopkins Verbal learning Test-Revised. Mental Measurements Yearbook 2010;16. Available online at: http://0web.ebscohost.com.ilsprod.lib.neu.edu/ehost/detail?vid=5&hid=127&sid=17afb9aa-5735-46c9acec7ab37092b16d%40sessionmgr111&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=loh&AN=16112817, accessed 25 May 2011
   Google Scholar
• Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics4th. McGraw Hill, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB. Effects of using same versus alternate-form memory tests during short-interval repeated assessments in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005; 11: 727–736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB, Zgaljardic DJ. Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropspychology 1998; 20: 339–352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird CM, Papadopoulou K, Ricciardelli P, Rossor MN, Cipolotti L. Test-retest reliability, practice effects and reliable change indices for the Recognition Memory Test. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 2003; 42: 407–425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods SP, Delis DC, Scott JC, Kramer JH, Holdnack JA. The California Verbal Learning Test- second edition: Test-retest reliability, practice effects, and reliable change indices for the standard and alternate forms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 413–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H, Alderman N, Burgess P. The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1998; 8: 213–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Goldstein R. Test-re-test reliability of the VIrtual Planning Test. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 1191–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Goldstein R, Strangman GE, Katz DI, Glenn MB. Test-re-test reliability of the VIrtual Planning Test in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 509–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods SP, Scott JC, Conover E, Marcotte TD, Heaton RK. Grant I Test-retest reliability of component process variables within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. Assessment 2005; 12: 96–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu B-C, Millis S, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Hanks R, Novack T, Hart T. Measuring recovery in new learning and memory following traumatic brain injury: A mixed-effects modeling approach. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2007; 29: 617–625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengenfelder J, Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. The efficacy of the generation effect in improving new learning in persons with traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2007; 52: 290–296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EMS. Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests3rd. Oxford University Press, New York 2006
   Google Scholar
• Lowe C, Rabbitt P. Test/re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: Theoretical and practical issues. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 915–923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Strangman GE, Goldstein R, Katz DI, Savage CR, Kelkar K, Supelana C, Burke D, Rauch SL, Glenn MB. A controlled treatment study of internal memory strategies (I-MEMS) following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010; 25: 43–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey CE, Cilo M, Berry J, Cusick C. The effect of Aricept in persons with persistent memory disorder following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 2003; 17: 809–815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver JM, Koumaras B, Chen M, Mirski D, Potkin SG, Reyes P, Warden D, Harvey PD, Arciniegas D, Katz DI, Gunay I. Effects of rivastigmine on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006; 67: 748–755
   Google Scholar
• Silver JM, Koumaras B, Meng X, Potkin SG, Reyes PF, Harvey PD, Katz DI, Gunay I, Arciniegas DB. Long-term effects of rivastigmine capsules in patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2009; 23: 123–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Rousson V, Gasser T, Seifert B. Assessing intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability of continuous measurements. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 3431–3446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice2nd. Prentice Hall Health, Highland Park, NJ 2000
   Google Scholar
• Butters N, Wolfe J, Granholm E, Martone M. An assessment of verbal recall, recognition and fluency abilities in patients with Huntington's disease. Cortex 1986; 22: 11–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MK. Functional forms of human memory. Brain organization and memory. Cells, systems, and circuits, JL McGaugh, NM Veinburger, G Lynch. Oxford University Press, New York 1990; 106–135
   Google Scholar
• Tulving E. Concepts of memory. The Oxford Handbook of Memory, E Tulving, FIM Craik. Oxford University Press, New York 2000; 33–43
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Vargha-Khadem F, Mishkin M. Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001; 13: 357–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch M, Westmacott R, Gilboa A, Addis DP, Rosenbaum S, Viskontas I. Hippocampal complex contribution to retention and retrieval of recent and remote episodic and semantic memories: Evidence from behavioural and neuroimaging studies of healthy and brain-damaged people. Dynamic cognitive processes, N Ohta, CM MacLeod, B Uttl. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo 2005; 333–380
   Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer KH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1987
   Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition Adult version. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 2000
   Google Scholar