The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury lesion detection

References

• Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 2006; 3: 255–268
   Google Scholar
• Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Dearden M, Iannotti F, Karimi A, Lapierre F, Maas A, Ohman J, et al. The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 1999; 3: 223–236
   Google Scholar
• Cremer OL, Moons KG, van Dijk GW, van Balen P, Kalkman CJ. Prognosis following severe head injury: Development and validation of a model for prediction of death, disability, and functional recovery. Journal of Trauma 2006; 6: 1484–1491
   Google Scholar
• Myburgh JA, Cooper DJ, Finfer SR, Venkatesh B, Jones D, Higgins A, Bishop N, Higlett T. Epidemiology and 12-month outcomes from traumatic brain injury in australia and new zealand. Journal of Trauma 2008; 4: 854–862
   Google Scholar
• Povlishock JT, Katz DI. Update of neuropathology and neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2005; 1: 76–94
   Google Scholar
• Manolakaki D, Velmahos GC, Spaniolas K, de Moya M, Alam HB. Early magnetic resonance imaging is unnecessary in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma 2009; 4: 1008–1012
   Google Scholar
• Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B, Dunn VD. Prospective comparative study of intermediate-field MR and CT in the evaluation of closed head trauma. American Journal of Roentgenology 1988; 3: 673–682
   Google Scholar
• Hesselink JR, Dowd CF, Healy ME, Hajek P, Baker LL, Luerssen TG. MR imaging of brain contusions: A comparative study with CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 1988; 5: 1133–1142
   Google Scholar
• Mittl RL, Grossman RI, Hiehle JF, Hurst RW, Kauder DR, Gennarelli TA, Alburger GW. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1994; 8: 1583–1589
   Google Scholar
• Ashikaga R, Araki Y, Ishida O. MRI of head injury using FLAIR. Neuroradiology 1997; 4: 239–242
   Google Scholar
• Gentry LR. Imaging of closed head injury. Radiology 1994; 1: 1–17
   Google Scholar
• Scheid R, Preul C, Gruber O, Wiggins C, von Cramon DY. Diffuse axonal injury associated with chronic traumatic brain injury: Evidence from T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging at 3 T. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2003; 6: 1049–1056
   Google Scholar
• Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, Tong KA. Use of advanced neuroimaging techniques in the evaluation of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuroscience 2006; 4–5: 309–326
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth JL, Stevens RD, Imaging brain trauma. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2010;16(2):92–97
   Google Scholar
• Chastain CA, Oyoyo UE, Zipperman M, Joo E, Ashwal S, Shutter LA, Tong KA. Predicting outcomes of traumatic brain injury by imaging modality and injury distribution. Journal of Neurotrauma 2009; 8: 1183–1196
   Google Scholar
• Sigmund GA, Tong KA, Nickerson JP, Wall CJ, Oyoyo U, Ashwal S. Multimodality comparison of neuroimaging in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Pediatric Neurology 2007; 4: 217–226
   Google Scholar
• Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, Shutter LA, Herigault G, Haacke EM, Kido DK. Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: Improved detection and initial results. Radiology 2003; 2: 332–339
   Google Scholar
• Akiyama Y, Miyata K, Harada K, Minamida Y, Nonaka T, Koyanagi I, Asai Y, Houkin K. Susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of cerebral microhemorrhage in patients with traumatic brain injury. Neurologia Medico Chirurgica (Tokyo) 2009; 3: 97–99
   Google Scholar
• Goos JD, van der Flier WM, Knol DL, Pouwels PJ, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Wattjes MP. Clinical relevance of improved microbleed detection by susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2011; 42: 1894–1900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheid R, Ott DV, Roth H, Schroeter ML, von Cramon DY. Comparative magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla for the evaluation of traumatic microbleeds. Journal of Neurotrauma 2007; 12: 1811–1816
   Google Scholar
• Nandigam RN, Viswanathan A, Delgado P, Skehan ME, Smith EE, Rosand J, Greenberg SM, Dickerson BC. MR imaging detection of cerebral microbleeds: Effect of susceptibility-weighted imaging, section thickness, and field strength. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009; 30: 338–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehling C, Wersching H, Kloska SP, Kirchhof P, Ring J, Nassenstein I, Allkemper T, Knecht S, Bachmann R, Heindel W. Detection of asymptomatic cerebral microbleeds: A comparative study at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Academic Radiology 2008; 7: 895–900
   Google Scholar
• Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, Nickerson JP, Wall CJ, Shutter LA, Osterdock RJ, Haacke EM, Kido D. Diffuse axonal injury in children: Clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Annals of Neurology 2004; 1: 36–50
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier A, Galanaud D, Puybasset L, Muller JC, Lescot T, Boch AL, Riedl V, Cornu P, Coriat P, Dormont D, et al. Early morphologic and spectroscopic magnetic resonance in severe traumatic brain injuries can detect “invisible brain stem damage” and predict “vegetative states”. Journal of Neurotrauma 2006; 5: 674–685
   Google Scholar
• Gerber DJ, Weintraub AH, Cusick CP, Ricci PE, Whiteneck GG. Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic brain injury: Relationship of T2*SE and T2GE to clinical severity and outcome. Brain Injury 2004; 11: 1083–1097
   Google Scholar
• Yanagawa Y, Tsushima Y, Tokumaru A, Un-no Y, Sakamoto T, Okada Y, Nawashiro H, Shima K. A quantitative analysis of head injury using T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging. Journal of Trauma 2000; 2: 272–277
   Google Scholar
• Babikian T, Freier MC, Tong KA, Nickerson JP, Wall CJ, Holshouser BA, Burley T, Riggs ML, Ashwal S. Susceptibility weighted imaging: Neuropsychologic outcome and pediatric head injury. Pediatric Neurology 2005; 3: 184–194
   Google Scholar
• Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G, Pfausler B, Haring HP, Ulmer H, Felber S, Golaszewski S, Aichner F. Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic vegetative state with cerebral magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 1998; 9118: 1763–1767
   Google Scholar
• Pierallini A, Pantano P, Fantozzi LM, Bonamini M, Vichi R, Zylberman R, Pisarri F, Colonnese C, Bozzao L. Correlation between MRI findings and long-term outcome in patients with severe brain trauma. Neuroradiology 2000; 12: 860–867
   Google Scholar
• Marquez de la Plata C, Ardelean A, Koovakkattu D, Srinivasan P, Miller A, Phuong V, Harper C, Moore C, Whittemore A, Madden C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of diffuse axonal injury: Quantitative assessment of white matter lesion volume. Journal of Neurotrauma 2007; 4: 591–598
   Google Scholar
• Scheid R, Walther K, Guthke T, Preul C, von Cramon DY. Cognitive sequelae of diffuse axonal injury. Archives of Neurology 2006; 3: 418–424
   Google Scholar
• Firsching R, Woischneck D, Klein S, Reissberg S, Dohring W, Peters B. Classification of severe head injury based on magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 2001; 3: 263–271
   Google Scholar
• Mannion RJ, Cross J, Bradley P, Coles JP, Chatfield D, Carpenter A, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Hutchinson PJ. Mechanism-based MRI classification of traumatic brainstem injury and its relationship to outcome. Journal of Neurotrauma 2007; 1: 128–135
   Google Scholar
• Bigler ED. Anterior and middle cranial fossa in traumatic brain injury: Relevant neuroanatomy and neuropathology in the study of neuropsychological outcome. Neuropsychology 2007; 5: 515–531
   Google Scholar
• Adams JH, Doyle D, Ford I, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI, McLellan DR. Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: Definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology 1989; 1: 49–59
   Google Scholar
• Paterakis K, Karantanas AH, Komnos A, Volikas Z. Outcome of patients with diffuse axonal injury: The significance and prognostic value of MRI in the acute phase. Journal of Trauma 2000; 6: 1071–1075
   Google Scholar
• Skandsen T, Kvistad KA, Solheim O, Strand IH, Folvik M, Vik A. Prevalence and impact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: A cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1-year outcome. Journal of Neurosurgery 2010; 113: 556–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Hackney DB, Goldberg HI, Grossman RI. Head injury: Early results of comparing CT and high-field MR. American Journal of Roentgenology 1986; 6: 1215–1222
   Google Scholar
• Bradley WG, Jr. MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993; 1: 15–26
   Google Scholar
• Provenzale J. CT and MR imaging of acute cranial trauma. Emergency Radiology 2007; 1: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal JV, Bryant DJ, Kasuboski L, Pattany PM, De Coene B, Lewis PD, Pennock JM, Oatridge A, Young IR, Bydder GM. Use of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences in MRI of the brain. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1992; 6: 841–844
   Google Scholar
• Metting Z, Rodiger LA, De Keyser J, van der Naalt J. Structural and functional neuroimaging in mild-to-moderate head injury. Lancet Neurology 2007; 8: 699–710
   Google Scholar
• De Coene B, Hajnal JV, Gatehouse P, Longmore DB, White SJ, Oatridge A, Pennock JM, Young IR, Bydder GM. MR of the brain using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1992; 6: 1555–1564
   Google Scholar
• Atlas SW, Mark AS, Grossman RI, Gomori JM. Intracranial hemorrhage: Gradient-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T. Comparison with spin-echo imaging and clinical applications. Radiology 1988; 3: 803–807
   Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Johnson K, Buxton R, Shoukimas G, Rosen BR, Davis KR, Brady TJ. MR of hemorrhage: A new approach. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1986; 5: 751–756
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal V, Delproposto Z, Haacke EM, Tong KA, Wycliffe N, Kido DK, Xu Y, Neelavalli J, Haddar D, Reichenbach JR. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2005; 4: 439–450
   Google Scholar
• Thomas B, Somasundaram S, Thamburaj K, Kesavadas C, Gupta AK, Bodhey NK, Kapilamoorthy TR. Clinical applications of susceptibility weighted MR imaging of the brain - a pictorial review. Neuroradiology 2008; 2: 105–116
   Google Scholar
• Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC. Susceptibility-weighted imaging: Technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009; 1: 19–30
   Google Scholar
• Akter M, Hirai T, Hiai Y, Kitajima M, Komi M, Murakami R, Fukuoka H, Sasao A, Toya R, Haacke EM, et al. Detection of hemorrhagic hypointense foci in the brain on susceptibility-weighted imaging clinical and phantom studies. Academic Radiology 2007; 9: 1011–1019
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 8: 573–585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire SM, Chaudhary UJ, Brown MM, Yousry TA, Kallis C, Jager HR, Werring DJ. The Microbleed Anatomical Rating Scale (MARS): Reliability of a tool to map brain microbleeds. Neurology 2009; 21: 1759–1766
   Google Scholar
• Pasqualin A, Barone G, Cioffi F, Rosta L, Scienza R, Da Pian R. The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1991; 3: 370–379
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, Viswanathan A, Al-Shahi SR, Warach S, Launer LJ, Van Buchem MA, Breteler MM. Cerebral microbleeds: A guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurology 2009; 2: 165–174
   Google Scholar
• Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Virchow-Robin spaces at MR imaging. Radiographics 2007; 4: 1071–1086
   Google Scholar
• Wallace CJ, Sevick RJ. Multifocal white matter lesions. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 1996; 3: 251–264
   Google Scholar
• Tsushima Y, Endo K. Hypointensities in the brain on T2*-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 2006; 4: 140–150
   Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychology Bulletin 1979; 2: 420–428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roob G, Schmidt R, Kapeller P, Lechner A, Hartung HP, Fazekas F. MRI evidence of past cerebral microbleeds in a healthy elderly population. Neurology 1999; 5: 991–994
   Google Scholar
• Gentry LR, Godersky JC, Thompson B. MR imaging of head trauma: Review of the distribution and radiopathologic features of traumatic lesions. American Journal Roentgenology 1988; 3: 663–672
   Google Scholar
• Meythaler JM, Peduzzi JD, Eleftheriou E, Novack TA. Current concepts: Diffuse axonal injury-associated traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilation 2001; 10: 1461–1471
   Google Scholar
• Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003; 6: 469–480
   Google Scholar
• Kou Z, Wu Z, Tong KA, Holshouser B, Benson RR, Hu J, Haacke EM. The role of advanced MR imaging findings as biomarkers of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabiltion 2010; 4: 267–282
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Yablonskiy DA, Thompson MR, Lai S, Haacke EM. Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1997; 2: 266–279
   Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Dammers R, Lu J, Marmarou A, Mushkudiani NA, McHugh GS, Murray GD. Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: Results from the IMPACT study. Journal of Neurotrauma 2007; 2: 303–314
   Google Scholar