The role of commonality, distinctiveness and importance of semantic features in persons with aphasia

References

• Martin A. Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition, R Cabeza, A Kingstone. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2001; 153–186
   Google Scholar
• Hampton J. Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 1979; 18: 441–461
   Google Scholar
• Hampton J. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory and Cognition 1987; 15: 55–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara T, Sternberg R. Mental modes of word meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 1983; 22: 253–265
   Google Scholar
• Miller GA, Johnson-Laird P. Language and perception. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1976
   Google Scholar
• Smith EE, Medlin DL. Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA 1981
   Google Scholar
• Smith EE, Shoben EJ, Rips LJ. Structure and process in semantic memory: Featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 1974; 81: 214–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler LK, Moss HE, Durrant-Peatfield MR, Levy J. Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language 2000; 75: 195–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox V, Do feature importance and feature centrality differentially influence semantic knowledge in individuals with aphasia [dissertation]. Kent, OH: Kent State University; 2009. Available online at: http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi/Cox%20Violet%20O.pdf?kent1258671486, accessed December 16, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Germani MJ, Pierce R. Semantic attribute knowledge in adults with right and left hemisphere damage. Aphasiology 1995; 9: 1–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason-Baughman MB. The role of common and distinctive features in semantic knowledge of persons with aphasia: A pilot study. The PSHA Journal 2010; 1: 30–40
   Google Scholar
• Mason-Baughman MB, Wallace SE. Semantic feature knowledge in persons with aphasia: The role of commonality, distinctiveness, and importance. Aphasiology 2012; 10: 1278–1297
   Google Scholar
• Vecchi B, Memoria semantica in pazienti afasici e con malattia di Alzheimer [thesis]. Padova, Italy: Universita degli studi di Padova; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. American Guidance Service, Pines, MN 1981
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H. The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination3rd. Pro-Ed Inc, Austin, TX 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test2nd. Pro-Ed Inc, Austin, TX 2001
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth B, Howard D, McLoughlin P. The semantic deficit in aphasia: The relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming. Neuropsychologia 1984; 22: 409–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grogan S, Pierce R, Factors influencing single word reading comprehension in aphasic adults. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, New Orleans, November 1994
   Google Scholar
• Howland J, Pierce R. Influence of semantic relatedness and array size on single-word reading comprehension in aphasia. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 1005–1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce R, Jarecki J, Cannito M. Single word comprehension in aphasia: Influence of array size, picture relatedness, and situational context. Aphasiology 1990; 4: 155–165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole-Virtue J, Nickels L. Why cabbage and not carrot? An investigation of factors affecting performance on spoken word to picture matching. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 153–179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay J, Lesser R, Coltheart M. PALPA: Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated Ltd, Hove, UK 1992
   Google Scholar
• Francis WN, Kucera H. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Baker E. Semantic field, naming, and auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language 1976; 3: 339–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainotti G, Caltegirone C, Micheli G, Masullo C. Selective semantic-lexical impairment of language comprehension in right-brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 1981; 13: 210–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel L, Semantic feature knowledge in adults with aphasia. 66th Annual Ohio Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention; Mar 8-10 2012; Columbus, OH
   Google Scholar
• Boyle M, Coelho CA. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1995; 4: 135–138
   Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, McHugh RE, Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology 2000; 14: 133–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley A, Coelho CA. Treatment of word retrieval in chronic Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology 2003; 17: 203–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2004; 13: 236–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran S. Semantic complexity in the treatment of naming deficits. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 2007; 16: 18–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran S. Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia treatment: Further evidencfor semantic complexity. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2008; 5: 1550–1568
   Google Scholar
• Thompson CK, Shapiro LP, Kiran S, Sobecks J. The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment effects (CATE). Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 591–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonucci S. Use of semantic feature analysis in group aphasia treatment. Aphasiology 2009; 23: 854–866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer C, Antonucci S. Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and expansion. Aphasiology 2012; 26: 64–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar