Sensitivity of the RBANS to acute traumatic brain injury and length of post-traumatic amnesia

References

• Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): Preliminary clinical validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998; 20: 310–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gontkovsky ST, McSwan KL, Scott JG. Sensitivity of the semantic fluency subtest of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Psychological Reports 2002; 90: 858–860
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stellton D. The role of the RBANS-A and DRS in the diagnosis and cognitive profiling of Alzheimer's disease. Dissertaton Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2006; 67: 1200
   Google Scholar
• Beatty WW, Ryder KA, Gontkovsky ST, Scott JG, McSwan KL, Bharucha KJ. Analyzing the subcortical dementia syndrome of Parkinson's disease using the RBANS. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2003; 18: 509–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beglinger LJ, Duff K, Allison J, Theriault D, O'Rourke JJ, Leserman A, Paulsen JS. Cognitive change in patients with Huntington disease on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010; 32: 573–578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freilich BM, Hyer LA. Relation of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status to measures of daily functioning in dementia. Psychological Reports 2007; 101: 119–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson VL, Hall JR, Humphreys-Clark JD, Schrimsher GW, O'Bryant SE. Identifying functional impairment with scores from the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2010; 25: 525–530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JC. Clinical dementia rating: A reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. International Psychogeriatriatrics 1997; 9(Suppl 1)173–176, discussion 177–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larson E, Kirschner K, Bode R, Heinemann A, Goodman R. Construct and predictive validity of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in the evaluation of stroke patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005; 27: 16–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation 1987; 1: 6–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 519–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing 1983; 12: 166–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde MC. The validity of the repeatable battery of neuropsychological status in acute stroke. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2006; 20: 702–715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde MC. Lesion location and repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status performance in acute ischemic stroke. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2010; 24: 57–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold JM, Queern C, Iannone VN, Buchanan RW. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia I: Sensitivity, reliability, and validity. American Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1944–1950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart MP, Goldberg R, Bartko JJ, Gold JM. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: Convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. American Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1951–1957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk CM, Gold JM, Humber K, Dickerson F, Fenton WS, Buchanan RW. Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: Normative data for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. Schizophrenia Research 2004; 70: 175–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachet AK. Construct validity of the Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) with acquired brain injury patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2007; 21: 286–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C, Casey JE, Wertheimer J, Fichtenberg NL. Reliability and validity of the RBANS in a traumatic brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2007; 22: 91–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton A. Revised Benton Visual Retention TestThe Psychological Corporation. New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• McKay C, Wertheimer JC, Fichtenberg NL, Casey JE. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): Clinical utility in a traumatic brain injury sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2008; 22: 22–241
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1979; 167: 675–684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novack TA, Dowler RN, Bush BA, Glen T, Schneider JJ. Validity of the Orientation Log, relative to the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000; 15: 957–961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test 4 Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL 2006
   Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Brooks DN, Aughton ME, Bond MR, Jones P, Rizvi S. Cognitive sequelae in relationship to early indices of severity of brain damage after severe blunt head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1980; 43: 529–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel WR. Cerebral involvement in head injury. Brain 1932; 55: 549–603
   Google Scholar
• Russell WR, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961; 5: 4–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R. Prognosis after severe head injury. Ciba Foundation Symposium 1975; 34: 309–324
   Google Scholar
• Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Clark MVB, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, Luerssen TG, Marmarou A, Foulkes MA. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. Journal of Neurosurgery 1991; 75: S14–S20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman DJ, Coronado V, Selassie T. The epidemiology of TBI: implications for public health. Brain injury medicine principles and practiceDemos Medical Publishing, ND Zasler, DI Katz, R Zafonte, New York 2007; 45–56
   Google Scholar
• Katz DI, Alexander MP. Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Archives of Neurology 1994; 51: 661–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar