Test of Everyday Attention in patients with chronic stroke: Test–retest reliability and practice effects

References

• Hochstenbach JB, den Otter R, Mulder TW. Cognitive recovery after stroke: a 2-year follow-up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003;84:1499–1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach JB, Mulder T, van Limbeek J, Donders R, Schoonderwaldt H. Cognitive decline following stroke: a comprehensive study of cognitive decline following stroke. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1998;20:503–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman D, Pickering RM, Ashburn A. The influence of attention deficits on functional recovery post stroke during the first 12 months after discharge from hospital. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2008;79:656–663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowd JM, Filion DL, Pohl PS, Richards LG, Stiers W. Attentional abilities and functional outcomes following stroke. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2003;58:45–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM, van der Worp HB, Jansen BPW, Algra A, de Haan EHF, Kappelle LJ. The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke. Neurology 2005;64:821–827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychology 1997;11:290–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman D, Ashburn A. People with stroke living in the community: attention deficits, balance, ADL ability and falls. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003;25:817–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loetscher T, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013
   Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of everyday attention. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1996;2:525–534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bate AJ, Mathias JL, Crawford JR. Performance on the Test of Everyday Attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2001;15:405–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Baird BJ, Tombaugh TN, Francis M. The effects of practice on speed of information processing using the Adjusting-Paced Serial Addition Test (Adjusting-PSAT) and the Computerized Tests of Information Processing (CTIP). Applied Neuropsychology 2007;14:88–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso MR, Bornstein RA, Lang JM. Practice effects on commonly used measures of executive function across twelve months. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1999;13:283–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck KK, Atkinson TM, Ryan JP. Evidence of practice effects in variants of the Trail Making Test during serial assessment. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2008;30:312–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey RJ, Ortega A, Orsillo SM, Nelles WB, Haase RF. Practice effects in repeated neuropsychological assessments. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1992;6:32–42
   Google Scholar
• Beglinger LJ, Gaydos B, Tangphao-Daniels O, Duff K, Kareken DA, Crawford J, Fastenau PS, Siemers ER. Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2005;20:517–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan RC, Hoosain R, Lee TMC. Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of the Test of Everyday Attention among normal Hong Kong Chinese: a preliminary report. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:900–909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural Inattention Test Manual. Titchfield, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1987;68:98–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh J, Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist 1986;5:165–173
   Google Scholar
• Wong MTP, Ho TP, Ho MY, Yu CS, Wong YH, Lee SY. Development and inter-rater reliability of a standardized verbal instruction manual for the Chinese Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2002;17:459–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang WK, Ungvari GS, Chiu HF, Sze KH. Detecting depression in Chinese stroke patients: a pilot study comparing four screening instruments. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 2004;34:155–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12:189–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace J, Nadler JD, White DA, Guilmette TJ, Giuliano AJ, Monsch AU, Snow MG. Folstein vs modified Mini-Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke. Stability, validity, and screening utility. Archives of Neurology 1995;52:477–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys G, van Zandvoort M, de Kort P, Jansen B, Kappelle L, de Haan E. Restrictions of the Mini-Mental State Examination in acute stroke. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 2005;20:623–629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes WC, Shea JA. Performance of a new, HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument in asymptomatic seropositive individuals. Quality of Life Research 1997;6:561–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushnell CD, Johnston DC, Goldstein LB. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity: comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Stroke 2001;32:656–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Chelune G, Naugle R, Lueders H, Sedlak J, Awad I. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology 1993;7:41–52
   Google Scholar
• Raymond PD, Hinton-Bayre AD, Radel M, Ray MJ, Marsh NA. Assessment of statistical change criteria used to define significant change in neuropsychological test performance following cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2006;29:82–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Temkin NR, Heaton RK, Grant I, Dikmen SS. Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: a comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 1999;5:357–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calero MD, Navarro E. Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004;19:653–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar