Predictors of health-related quality-of-life following traumatic brain injury

References

• Dijkers MP. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: A review of research approaches and findings. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2004;85(Suppl 2):S21–S35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Long-term outcome of serious traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2008;25(Suppl 42):115–122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemse-van Son AHP, Ribbers GM, Verhagen AP, Stam HJ. Prognostic factors of long-term functioning and productivity after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Clinical Rehabilitation 2007;21:1024–1037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombardier CH, Fann JR, Temkin NR, Esselman PC, Barber J, Dikmen SS. Rates of major depressive disorder and clinical outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Journal of the American Medical Association 2010;303:1938–1945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gironda RJ, Clark ME, Ruff RL, Chait S, Craine M, Walker R, Scholten J. Traumatic brain injury, polytrauma, and pain: Challenges and treatment strategies for the polytrauma rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology 2009;54:247–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nampiaparampil DE. Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 2008;300:711–719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott TR, Kurylo M, Rivera P. Positive growth following acquired physical disability. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. pp 687–698
   Google Scholar
• Elliott TR, Warren AM. Why psychology is important in rehabilitation. In: Kennedy P, editor. Psychological management of physical disability: practitioner’s guide. New York: Routledge; 2007. pp 14–33
   Google Scholar
• Dunn DS, Uswatte G, Elliott TR. Happiness, resilience and positive growth following disability: issues for understanding, research, and therapeutic intervention. In: Lopez SJ, editor. The handbook of positive psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. pp 651–664
   Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM, Schkade D. Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology 2005;9:111–131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Olver J, Ponsford M, Nelms R. Long-term adjustment of families following traumatic brain injury where comprehensive rehabilitation has been provided. Brain Injury 2003;17:453–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Baalen B, Ribbers GM, Medema-Meulepas D, Pas MS, Odding E, Stam HJ. Being restricted in participation after a traumatic brain injury is negatively associated by passive coping style of the caregiver. Brain Injury 2007;21:925–931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciulek JF, Lustig DC. Differentiation of three brain injury family types. Brain Injury 1999;13:245–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CL, Resch JA, Elliott TR, Villarreal V, Kwok O, Berry JW, Underhill AT. Family satisfaction predicts life satisfaction trajectories over the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2010;55:180–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn D, Uswatte G, Elliott TR, Lastres A, Beard B. A positive psychology of physical disability: Principles and progress. In: Wehmeyer MF, editor. The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford University Press; In press
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin, FS. The functional independence measure: A new tool for rehabilitation. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation 1987;1:6–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olson DH, Wilson M. Family satisfaction. In: Olson DH, McCubbin HI, Barnes H, Larsen A, Muxen M, Wilson M, editors. Family social science. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota; 1982. pp 25–31
   Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care 1981;19:787–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Injury Scaling. The Abbreviated Injury Scale-1985 Revision. Morton Grove, IL: American Association of Automotive Medicine; 1985
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie EJ, Steinwachs DM, Shankar B. Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses: Validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Medical Care 1989;27:412–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman BP, Caesar RR, Parks J, Madden C, Gentilello LM, Shafi S, Carlile MC, Harper CR, Diaz-Arrastia RR. Usefulness of Abbreviated Injury Score and the Injury Severity Score in comparison to the Glascow Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Trauma 2007;62:946–950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation patients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1993;74:531–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch JA, Villarreal V, Johnson CL, Elliott TR, Kwok O, Berry JW, Underhill AT. Trajectories of life satisfaction in the first 5 years following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 2009;54:51–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underhill AT, LoBello SG, Fine PR. Reliability and validity of the family satisfaction scale with survivors of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation and Research Development 2004;41:603–610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson K, Ponsford J. Coping and emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006;21:248–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, Machamer J, Temkin N. Psychosocial outcome in patients with moderate to severe head injury: 2-year follow-up. Brain Injury 1993;7:113–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean A Jr, Dikmen SS, Temkin NR. Psychosocial recovery after head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1993;74:1041–1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2010. Available online at: http://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus %20 Users%20Guide%20v6.pdf, accessed April 2012
   Google Scholar
• Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. A second course in structural equation modeling. Greenwich CT: Information Age; 2006. pp 269–314
   Google Scholar
• Yu C, Muthén BO. Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: Graduate School of Education and Information Studies; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson SR, Olmos A. Behavior of descriptive fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis using ordered categorical data. Structure Equation Modeling 1998;5:344–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008;40:879–891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2004;39:99–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 2002;7:422–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson B. Foundations of behavioral statistics: an insight-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman JM, Pagulayan KF, Zawaideh N, Dikmen S, Temkin N, Bell KR. Understanding pain after traumatic brain injury: Impact of community integration. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2007;86:962–969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson D. FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy 2011;37:64–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seel RT, Kreutzer S, Rosenthal M, Hammond FM, Corrigan JD, Black K. Depression after traumatic brain injury: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Model Systems multicenter investigation. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2003;84:177–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston R, Gore PA Jr, Chan F, Catalano D. An introduction to structural equation models in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology 2008;53:340–356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar