Impaired practice effects following mild traumatic brain injury: An event-related potential investigation

References

• Binder L, Rohling M, Larrabee G. A review of mild head trauma. Part 1: Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1997;19:421–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frencham KAR, Fox AM, Maybery MT. Neuropsychological studies of mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review of research since 1995. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2005;27:334–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Benton AL, Grossman RG. Neurobehavioral consequences of closed head injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1982
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD. Attentional deficits and dual task demands after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996;10:79–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder LM. Persisting symptoms after mild head injury: A review of the postconcussive syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Clinical Neuropsychology 1986;8:323–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977;84:127–190
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. Working memory. In: Bower GH, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. Volume 8. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p 47–89
   Google Scholar
• Norman DA, Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self-regulation. New York: Plenum Press; 1986. pp 1–18
   Google Scholar
• Hugenholtz H, Stuss D, Stetham L, Richard M. How long does it take to recover from a mild concussion? Neurosurgery 1988;22:853–858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuramen R, Mutter SA, Molloy R. Sustained attention following mild closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1991;13:789–811
   Google Scholar
• Stablum F, Mogentale C, Umiltà C. Executive functioning following mild closed head injury. Cortex 1996;32:261–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Azulay J. Diagnostic utility of attention measures in postconcussion syndrome. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2002;16:280–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice T, Burgess P. Supervisory control of action and thought selection. In: Baddeley A, Weiskrantz L, editors. Attention: Selection, awareness and control. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993. pp 171–187
   Google Scholar
• The Psychological Corporation. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD. Clinical sensitivity of four measures of attention to mild traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1997;11:266–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronwall D, Wrightson P. Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. The Lancet 1974;2:605–609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronwall DM, Sampson H. The psychological effects of concussion. New York: Oxford University Press; 1974
   Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Mattis S, Ruff RM, Eisenberg HM, Marshall LF, Tabaddor K, High WM, Frankowski RF. Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: A three-center study. Journal of Neurosurgery 1987;66:234–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman EMS, Strauss E, Spellacy F. Testing the validity of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) in adults with head injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1997;11:34–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, van Zomeren AH, Deelman BG. Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: Slowness only? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996;18:755–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehr MC, Heaton RK, Miller W, Grant I. The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT): Norms for age, education, and ethnicity. Assessment 1998;5:375–387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, Henk AL, Deelman BG, van Zomeren AH. Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI. Brain and Cognition 2001;47:446–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beglinger LJ, Gaydos B, Tangphao-Daniels O, Duff K, Kareken DA, Crawford J, Fastenau PS, Siemers ER. Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2005;20:517–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein A, Brown R, Ron M. Effects of practice of serial tests of attention in healthy adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Clinical Neuropsychology 1994;16:436–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers JM, Fox AM. Event-related potential practice effects on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2012;8:281–291
   Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, Timmerman ME, van Zomeren AH, Deelman BG. Recovery versus retest effects in attention after closed head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1999;21:585–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassi JL. Psychophysiology: Human behavior and psychological response. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Solbakk AK, Reinvang I, Nielsen C, Sundet K. ERP indicators of disturbed attention in mild closed head injury: A frontal lobe syndrome? Psychophysiology 1999;36:802–817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R. Selective attention and stimulus processing: Reflections in event-related potentials, magnetoencephalogram, and regional cerebral blood flow. In: Posner MI, Marin OS, editors. Attention and performance. Volume XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1985. pp 355–373
   Google Scholar
• Potter DD, Barrett K. Assessment of mild head injury with ERPs and neuropsychological tasks. Journal of Psychophysiology 1999;13:173–189
   Google Scholar
• Hansen JC, Hillyard SA. Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980;49:277–290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potter DD, Jory SH, Bassett MRA, Barrett K, Mychalkiw W. Effect of mild head injury on event-related potential correlates of Stroop task performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2002;8:828–837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DL. The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman P, Johnson R, editors. Event-related potentials: Issues and interdisciplinary vantages. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990. pp 178–209
   Google Scholar
• Shelley AM, Ward PB, Michie PT, Andrews S, Mitchell PF, Catts SV, McConaghy N. The effects of repeated testing on ERP components during auditory selective attention. Psychophysiology 1991;28:496–510
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kay T, Harrington DE, Adams R, Anderson T, Berrol S, Cicerone K, Dahlberg C, Gerber D, Goka R, Harley P, et al. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993;8:86–87
   Google Scholar
• Richardson J. Clinical and neuropsychological aspects of closed head injury. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press Ltd; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Royan J, Tombaugh TM, Rees L, Francis M. The Adjusting-Paced Serial Addition Test (Adjusting-PSAT): Thresholds for speed of information processing as a function of stimulus modality and problem complexity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2004;19:131–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Psychological Corporation. The Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Keller M, Hiltbrunner B, Dill C, Kesselring J. Reversible neuropsychological deficits after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2000;68:761–766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder LM, Rohling MI. Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry 1996;153:7–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey A. L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1964
   Google Scholar
• The Psychological Corporation. The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Abbreviated. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Roman DD, Edwall GE, Buchanan RJ, Patton JH. Extended norms for the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1991;5:33–40
   Google Scholar
• Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: The Psychological Foundation of Australia, Inc; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Gouvier WD, Cubic B, Jones G, Brantley P, Cutlip Q. Postconcussion symptoms and daily stress in normal and head-injured college populations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1992;7:193–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Humphrey M, Uttley D. Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1978;41:611–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: A measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology 1995;242:587–592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, Machamer J, Temkin N. Mild head injury: Facts and artifacts. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2001;23:729–738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Bogner J. Screening and identification of TBI. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007;22:315–317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado VG. Methodological issues and research recommendatiosn for mild traumatic brain injury: The WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004;43:113–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setnik L, Bazarian JJ. The characteristics of patients who do not seek medical treatment for traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2007;21:1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashman TA, Spielman LA, Hibbard MR, Silver JM, Chandna T, Gordon WA. Psychiatric challenges in the first 6 years after traumatic brain injury: Cross-sequential analyses of Axis I disorders. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004;85:S36–S42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fann JR, Burington B, Leonetti A, Jaffe K, Katon WJ, Thompson RS. Psychiatric illness following traumatic brain injury in an adult health maintenance organization population. Archives of General Psychiatry 2004;61:53–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan PJ1 HR, Martelli MF, Zasler ND. Pre-injury status and adaptation following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2002;16:41–49
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP. Anosognosia after traumatic brain injury. In: Prigatano GP, editor. The study of anosognosia. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. pp 229–254
   Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Understanding the ‘miserable minority': A diasthesis-stress paradigm for post-concussional syndrome. Brain Injury 2004;18:1135–1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Bogner J. Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2007;22:318–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderploeg RD, Groer S, Belanger HG. Initial developmental process of a VA semistructured clinical interview for TBI identification. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2012;49:545–556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniegas DB, Anderson CA, Topkoff J, McAllister TW. Mild traumatic brain injury: A neuropsychiatric approach to diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2005;1:311–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander MP. Neuropsychiatric correlates of persistent postconcussive syndrome. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992;7:60–69
   Google Scholar
• Jennett B. Some International comparisons. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AR, editors. Mild head injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989. pp 23–36
   Google Scholar
• Zasler N. Medical aspects. In: Raskin SA, Mateer CA, editors. Neuropsychological management of mild traumatic brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp 23–38
   Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Brown AW, Leibson CL, Flaada JT, Mandrekar JN, Diehl NN, Perkins PK. The Mayo classification system for traumatic brain injury severity. Journal of Neurotrauma 2007;24:1417–1424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus JF, Nourjah P. The epidemiology of mild, uncomplicated brain injury. Journal of Trauma 1988;28:1637–1643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annegers JF, Grabow JD, Kurland LT, Laws ER. The incidence, causes, and secular trends of head trauma in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology 1980;30:912–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan LM, O'Jile JR, Gouvier WD, Parks-Levy J, Betz B. Head injury in a college population: Analysis of epidemiological factors. Applied Neuropsychology 1996;3:49–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segalowitz SJ, Bernstein DM, Lawson S. P300 event related potential decrements in well-functioning university students with mild head injury. Brain and Cognition 2001;45:342–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan GD, Klapp ST. Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Perceptual Performance 1991;17:179–195
   Google Scholar
• Schneider W, Chein JM. Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 2003;27:525–559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider W. Connectionism: Is it a paradigm shift for psychology? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1987;19:73–83
   Google Scholar
• Mesulam MM. Large-scale attentional neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Annals of Neurology 1990;28:597–613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Rogers WA. Automatic process development following severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology 1997;11:296–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren AH, van den Burg W. Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985;48:21–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar