Text-to-speech accommodations for the reading challenges of adults with traumatic brain injury

References

• Aldrich EM, Obrzut JE. Assisting students with a traumatic brain injury in school interventions. Canadian Journal of School Psychology 2012;27:291–301
   Google Scholar
• Nieman W, Ruff RM, Kramer JH. An attempt toward differentiating attentional deficits in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology Review 1996;6:11–46
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Todis B, Glang A, Urbanczyk B, Franklin C, DePompei R, Feeney T, Maxwell NM, Pearson S, Tyler JS. Educating students with TBI: Themes and recommendations. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2001;16:76–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman SB, Gamino JF, Cook LG, Hanten G, Li X, Levin HS. Impaired discourse gist and working memory in children after brain injury. Brain and Language 2006;97:178–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook LG, DePompei R, Chapman SB. Cognitive communicative challenges in TBI: Assessment and intervention in the long term. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders 2011;21:33–42
   Google Scholar
• Gamino JF, Chapman SB, Cook LG. Strategic learning in youth with traumatic brain injury. Topics in Language Disorders 2009;29:224–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman L, Horney MA. Supported etext: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly 2007;42:155–160
   Google Scholar
• Abelson AG, Petersen M. Efficacy of “talking books” for a group of reading disabled boys. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1983;57:567–570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balajthy E. TTS software for struggling readers. Reading Online 2005;8:1--9. Avaiable online at: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/balajthy2/, accessed 23 June 2014
   Google Scholar
• Hale AD, Skinner CH, Winn BD, Oliver R, Allin JD, Molloy CM. An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools 2005;42:39–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett MW, Barron RW, Forbes JE, Cuksts B, Steinbach KA. Computer speech-based training of literacy skills in neurologically impaired children: A controlled evaluation. Brain and Language 1994;47:117–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson R, Foltz G, Wise B. Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 1986;18:93–99
   Google Scholar
• Rose TL, Sherry L. Relative effects of two previewing procedures on LD adolescents’ oral reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly 1984;7:39–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkind J, Black MS, Murray C. Computer-based compensation of adult reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia 1996;46:159–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker L, Burns L, Elkind J, Elkind K, Katz L. Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention disorders. Annals of Dyslexia 2002;52:243–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montali J, Lewandowski I. Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1996;29:271–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman A, Boon RR, Keller-Bell Y, Stagliano C, Jeffs T. Effects of text-to-speech software on the reading rate and comprehension skills of high school students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities 2010;16:41–49
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt AJ, McCallum E, Hale AD, Obeldobel E, Dingus K. Can text-to-speech assistive technology improve the reading comprehension of students with severe reading and emotional disabilities? Journal of Evidence- Based Practices for Schools 2009;10:95–119
   Google Scholar
• Higgins EL, Raskin MH. Speech recognition-based and automaticity programs to help students with severe reading and spelling problems. Annals of Dyslexia 2004;54:365–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsma P. Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback. Reading Research Quarterly 1988;23:219–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong CK. Effects of on-line reading and simultaneous DECtalk auding in helping below average and poor readers comprehend and summarize text. Learning Disability Quarterly 1995;18:101–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt AJ, Hale AD, McCallum E, Mauck B. Accommodating remedial readers in the general education setting: Is listening-while-reading sufficient to improve factual and inferential comprehension? Psychology in the Schools 2010;48:37–45
   Google Scholar
• Harvey J, Hux K, Scott N, Snell J. Text-to-speech technology effects on reading rate and comprehension by adults with TBI. Brain Injury 2013;27:1388–1394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J, Fishco V, Hanna G. The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Geneva, IL: Riverside Publishing Company; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert EH, Samuels SJ, Rasinski T. Comprehension-based silent reading rates: What do we know? What do we need to know? Literacy Research and Instruction 2012;51:110–124
   Google Scholar
• Freeland JT, Skinner CH, Jackson B, McDaniel CE, Smith S. Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools 2000;37:415–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asikainen I, Kaste M, Sarna S. Predicting late outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury referred to a rehabilitation programme: A study of 508 Finnish patients 5 years or more after injury. Brain Injury 1998;12:95–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortuny LA, Briggs M, Newcombe F, Ratcliff G, Thomas C. Measuring the duration of post-traumatic amnesia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1980;43:377–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel WR, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Archives of Neurology 1961;5:16–29
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson GS. Wide Range Achievement Test–3 (WRAT–3). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range, Inc.; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery–Revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Northcutt E. GED complete preparation. Austin, TX: Steck-Vaughn; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rockowitz M, Brownstein SC, Peters M, Wolf IK, Bolton JM, Feinstein R, Ramsey S, Gotlib L. Barron’s how to prepare for the GED High School Equivalency Exam. 11th ed. Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Stewart MA. Peterson’s master the GED 2011. Lawrenceville, NJ: Petersons.com/publishing; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke C. Kaplan GED. 7th ed. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2005
   Google Scholar
• My Byline Media. (n.d.) Readability Formulas. Free readability consensus calculator. Available online at: http://www.readabilityformulas.com/free-readability-formula-tests.php, accessed 18 May 2012
   Google Scholar
• Tuiman J. Determining the passage dependency of comprehension test questions in five major tests. Reading Research Quarterly 1974;2:206–223
   Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Hux K, McKelvey M, Beukelman D, Weissling K. Reading comprehension by people with chronic aphasia: A comparison of three levels of visuographic contextual support. Aphasiology 2009;23:1053–1064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. Error analysis and passage dependency of test items from a standardized test of multiple-sentence reading comprehension for aphasic and noon-brain-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1987;52:358–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholas LE, MacLennon D, Brookshire RH. Validity of multiple sentence reading comprehension tests for aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986;51:82–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams JR. Guidelines for the use of multimedia in instruction. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting 1998;42:1447–1451
   Google Scholar
• Tukey JW. Exploratory data analysis. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977
   Google Scholar
• Flemingham K, Baguley I, Green A. Effects of diffuse axonal injury on speed of information processing following severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2004;18:564–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthias J, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology 2004;21:212–223
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology 1992;14:822–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios M, Perianez JA, Munoz-Cespedes JM. Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004;18:257–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westby C. Assessing and remediating text comprehension problems. In: Catts HW, Kamhi AG, editors. Language and reading disabilities. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2005. p 157–232
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths GG. Evaluation of a reading comprehension strategy package to improve reading comprehension of adult college students with acquired brain injuries [dissertation]. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Manset-Williamson G, Dunn M, Hinshaw R, Nelson JM. The impact of self-questioning strategy use on the text-reader assisted comprehension of students with reading disabilities. International Journal of Special Education 2008;23:123–135
   Google Scholar
• Palinscar AS, Brown AL. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension–Fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1984;1:117–175
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Griffiths GG, Fickas S. An evaluation of reading comprehension of expository text in adults with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 2014;23:160–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar