Association between impulsivity, emotional/behavioural hyperactivation and functional outcome one year after severe traumatic brain injury

References

• Bayen E, Pradat-Diehl P, Jourdan C, Ghout I, Bosserelle V, Azerad S, Weiss JJ, Joel ME, Aegerter P, Azouvi P. Predictors of informal care burden 1 year after a severe traumatic brain injury: Results from the PariS-TBI study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2013;28:408–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosconi P, Taricco M, Bergamini M, Bosisio Fazzi L, Colombo C, Patrucco V, Corti M, Giobbe D, Guerreschi M, Magnarella MR, et al. Family burden after severe brain injury: The Italian experience with families and volunteer associations. Patient 2011;4:55–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pielmaier L, Walder B, Rebetez MML, Maercker A. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in relatives in the first weeks after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2011;25:259–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Osterwalder J, Graber C, Schoettker P, Stocker R, Zangger P, Vuadens P, Egger M, Walder B. Severe traumatic brain injury in Switzerland: Feasibility and first results of a cohort study. Swiss Medicine Weekly 2008;138:327–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milders M, Fuchs S, Crawford JR. Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2003;25:157–172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Grüner M, Kuchta J, Hellmich M, Klug N. Neurobehavioural deficits after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Injury 2006;20:569–574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister TW. Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury: Evaluation and management. World Psychiatry 2008;7:3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL. Understanding neurobehavioural disability. In: Wood RL, McMillan TM, editors. Neurobehavioural disability and social handicap following traumatic brain injury. Hove: Psychology Press; 2001. pp 1–28
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 2001;30:669–689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyders MA, Smith GT. Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: Positive and negative urgency. Psychological Bulletin 2008;134:807–828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyders MA, Dzemidzic M, Eiler WJ, Coskunpinar A, Karyadi KA, Kareken DA. Negative urgency mediates the relationship between amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex activation to negative emotional stimuli and general risk-taking. Cerebral Cortex 2014; pii;bhu123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith GT, Fischer S, Cyders MA, Annus AM, Spillane NS, McCarthy DM. On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits. Assessment 2007;14:155–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Beni C, Annoni JM, Vuadens P, Van der Linden M. How inhibition relates to impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2013;19:890–898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Billieux J, Juillerat Van der Linden AC, Annoni JM, Zekry D, Gold G, Van der Linden M. A multidimensional approach to impulsivity changes in mild Alzheimer’s disease and control participants: Cognitive correlates. Cortex 2013;49:90–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Beni C, Billieux J, Azouvi P, Annoni JM, Van der Linden M. Assessment of impulsivity after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2010;20:778–797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Delbeuck X, Billieux J, d’Acremont M, Juillerat Van der Linden AC, Van der Linden M. Assessing impulsivity changes in Alzheimer Disease. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 2008;22:278–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochat L, Beni C, Billieux J, Annoni JM, Van der Linden M. How impulsivity relates to compulsive buying and the burden perceived by caregivers after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Psychopathology 2011;44:158–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthe E, States JD, Mango NK. Abbreviated injury scale unification: The case for a unified injury system for global use. Journal of Trauma 1999;47:309–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Mazaux JM, Vanier M, Dartigues JF, Giroire JM, Daverat P, Pilon M, Hebert D, Johnson C, Fournier G, Barat M. Evaluation des troubles neuropsychologiques et comportementaux des traumatisés crâniens par le clinicien: Proposition d'une échelle neurocomportementale et premiers résultats de sa version française. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 1990;33:35–40
   Google Scholar
• Vanier M, Mazaux JM, Lambert J, Dassa C, Levin HS. Assessment of neuropsychologic impairments after head injury: Interrater reliability and factorial and criterion validity of the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;81:796–806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley SR, Levin HS, Vanier M, Mazaux JM, Boake C, Goldfader PR, Rockers D, Butters M, Kareken DA, Lambert J, et al. The neurobehavioural rating scale-revised: Sensitivity and validity in closed head injury assessment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2001;71:643–651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soury S, Mazaux JM, Lambert J, De Seze M, Joseph PA, Lozes-Boudillon S, McCauley SR, Vanier M, Levin HS. The neurobehavioral rating scale-revised: Assessment of concurrent validity. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 2005;48:61–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: Guidelines for their use. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998;15:573–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2000;69:204–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008;40:879–891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986;51:1173–1182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz MS, MacKinnon DP. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science 2007;18:233–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston R, Gore PA. A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist 2006;34:719–751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Zermatten A, Van der Linden M, d'Acremont M, Jermann F, Bechara A. Impulsivity and decision making. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 2005;193:647–650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara A, Van der Linden M. Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Current Opinion in Neurology 2005;18:734–739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman NP, Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004;133:101–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoska-Di Marco A, McDonald S, Kelly M, Tate R, Johnstone S. A meta-analysis of response inhibition and Stroop interference control deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011;33:471–485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gay P, Rochat L, Billieux J, d'Acremont M, Van der Linden M. Heterogeneous inhibition processes involved in different facets of self-reported impulsivity: Evidence from a community sample. Acta Psychologica 2008;129:332–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnould A, Rochat L, Azouvi P, Van der Linden M. A multidimensional approach to apathy after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology Review 2013;23:210–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions. Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist 1999;54:493–503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkard C, Rochat L, Van der Linden M. Enhancing inhibition: How impulsivity and emotional activation interact with different implementation intentions. Acta Psychologica 2013;144:291–297
   Google Scholar
• Demark J, Gemeinhardt M. Anger and it’s management for survivors of acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2002;16:91–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar