Return-to-work challenges following a work-related mild TBI: The injured worker perspective

References

• World Health Organization. Neurological disorders: public health challenges. Geneva: WHO Press; 2006. Available online at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/neurological_disorders_report_web.pdf, accessed 11 October 2012
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Cote P, Hincapie CA, Holm LW, Jartvigsen J, Donovan J, Nygren-de Broussard C, Kristman VL, Borg J. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2014;95(Suppl 2):S132–151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laker SR. Epidemiology of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2011;3:S354–358
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Comper P. Post injury symptoms after a work-related traumatic brain injury in a Canadian population. Work 2012;43:195–201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Connor C, Colantonio A, Polatajko H. Long term symptoms and limitations of activity of people with TBI: A ten year follow-up. Psychological Reports 2005;97:169–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall S, Bayley M, McCullagh S, Velikonja D, Berrigan L. Clinical practice and guidelines for mild traumatic brain injury and persistent symptoms. Canadian Family Physician 2012;58:257–267, e128–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff RM, Iverson GL, Barth JT, Bush SS, Broshek DK. Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: A National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2009;24:3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristman VL, Borg J, Godbolt AK, Salmi LR, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Nygren-de Broussard C, Hartvigsen J, Abara U, et al. Methodological issues and research recommendations for prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2014;95(Suppl 3):S265–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sveen U, Ostensjo S, Laxe S, Soberg HL. Problems in functioning after a mild traumatic brain injury within the ICF framework: The patient perspective using focus groups. Disability & Rehabilitation 2013;35:749–757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weightman MM, Bolgla R, McCulloch KL, Peterson MD. Physical therapy recommendations for service members with mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2010;25:206–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RC, Hudson JM. Beliefs about brain injury in Britain. Brain Injury 2010;24:797–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniegas DB, Anderson CA, Topkoff J, McAllister TW. Mild traumatic brain injury: A neuropsychiatric approach to diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. Neuropsychiatric Disease & Treatment 2005;1:311–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cancelliere CJ, Cassidy JD, Colantonio A. Specific disorder-linked determinants: traumatic brain injury. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook on work, disability and prevention. New York: Springer; 2013. pp 303–314
   Google Scholar
• Gilworth G, Eyres S, Carey A, Bhakta BB, Tennant A. Working with a brain injury: Personal experiences of returning to work following a mild or moderate brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2008;40:334–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney G, Speed J, Sheppard S. Factors related to recovery after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005;19:975–987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: Why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2010;20:349–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippel K. Workers describe the effect of the workers' compensation process on their health: A Quebec study. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 2007;30:427–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). By the numbers: 2012 WSIB statistical report. Schedule 1. Toronto, ON: WSIB; 2013. Available online at: http://www.wsibstatistics.ca/, accessed 7 December 2014
   Google Scholar
• Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). By the numbers: 2012 WSIB statistical report. Schedule 2. Toronto, ON: WSIB; 2013. Available online at: http://www.wsibstatistics.ca/, accessed 7 December 2014
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield L, MacEachen E, Tompa E, Kalcevich C, Endicott M, Yeung N. A critical review of literature on experience rating in workers’ compensation systems. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 2012;10:3–25
   Google Scholar
• MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 2007;5:41–62
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard D, MacEachen E, Lippel K. Disability management experts and the impact of jurisdiction on practice: An Ontario example. International Journal of Social Security and Workers Compensation 2010;2:1–16
   Google Scholar
• Ison TG. The significance of experience rating. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1986;24:723–742
   Google Scholar
• Clayton A. The prevention of occupational injuries and illness: the role of economic incentives. Working Paper no. 5. Canberra: Australian National University; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Levack W, McPherson K, McNaughton H. Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: Are we evaluating what is most important? Disability & Rehabilitation 2004;26:290–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooson JM, Coetzer R, Stew G, Moore A. Patients' experience of return to work rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: A phenomenological study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2013;23:19–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soeker MS. Occupational adaptation: A return to work perspective of persons with mild to moderate brain injury in South Africa. Journal of Occupational Science 2011;18:81–91
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Mroczek D, Patel J, Lewko J, Fergenbaum J, Brison R. Examining occupational traumatic brain injury in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2010;101:S58–S62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AE. Return to work following disabling occupational injury-facilitators of employment continuation. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 2010;36:473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembe AE. The social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses. American Journal of Indian Medicine 2001;40:403–417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2005;15:525–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunin L, Boden LI. The workers’ compensation system: Worker friend or foe? American Journal of Indian Medicine 2004;45:338–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101
   Google Scholar
• Harkins C, Shaw R, Gillies M, Sloan H, MacIntyre K, Scoular A, Morrison C, Mackay F, Cunningham H, Docherty P, et al. Overcoming barriers to engaging socio-economically disadvantaged populations in CHD primary prevention: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Longbottom P, Wallis M. The impact of organisational and individual factors on team communication in surgery: A qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010;47:732–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart BJ, Mikocka-Walus AA, Harley H, Andrews JM. Help-seeking and coping with the psychosocial burden of chronic hepatitis C: A qualitative study of patient, hepatologist, and counsellor perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2012;49:560–569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1991–2013 ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH
   Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Kayes NM, Fadyl JK. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disability & Rehabilitation 2010;32:986–999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Velzen J, van Bennekom CA, Edelaar MJ, Sluiter JK, Frings- Dresen MH. How many people return to work after acquired brain injury? A systematic review. Brain Injury 2009;23:473–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenson C, Svensson E, Linddahl I, Björklund A. Experiences of returning to work after acquired brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2007;14:205–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lippel K. The private policing of injured workers in Canada: Legitimate management practices or human rights violations? Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 2003;1:97–118
   Google Scholar
• Galizzi M, Miesmaa P, Punnett L, Slatin C and the Phase in Healthcare Research Team. Injured workers’ underreporting in the health care industry: An analysis using quantitative, qualitative, and observational data. Industrial Relations 2010;49:22–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins A. The impact of workers’ compensation premium incentives on health and safety. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety – Australia and New Zealand 1994;10:129–136
   Google Scholar
• Purse K. Workers' compensation, employment security and the return to work process. Economic and Labour Relations Review 1998;9:246–261
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Yates C. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: The need for new operational frameworks. Disability & Rehabilitation 2003;25:898–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown GD, Barab J. “Cooking the books” – behavior-based safety at the San Francisco Bay Bridge. New Solutions 2007;17:311–324
   Google Scholar
• Eakin J. The discourse of abuse in return-to-work: a hidden epidemic of suffering. In: Peterson CL, Mayhew C, editors. Occupational health and safety: International influences and the new epidemics. New York: Baywood; 2005. pp 159–174
   Google Scholar
• Stergiou-Kita M, Mansfield E, Colantonio A. Injured workers’ perspectives on how workplace accommodations are conceptualized and delivered following electrical injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2014;24:173–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjulin Å, MacEachen, E, Stiwne EE, Ekberg K. The social interaction of return to work explored from co-workers experiences. Disability & Rehabilitation 2011;33:1979–1989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield E, Stergiou-Kita M, Kirsh B, Colantonio A. After the storm: The social relations of return to work following electrical injury. Qualitative Health Research 2014;24:1183–1197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åhman S, Saveman BI, Styrke J, Björnstig U, Stålnacke BM. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2013;45:758–764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarasuk V, Eakin JM. The problem of legitimacy in the experience of work-related back injury. Qualitative Health Research 1995;5:204–221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Labriola M, Christensen K, Bültmann U, Villadsen E. Return to work among sickness-absent Danish employees: Prospective results from the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study/National Register on Social Transfer Payments. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2006;29:229–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: A systematic review of the literature. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2005;62:851–860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolin P, Villemure R, Heroux L. Determining long-term symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury: Method of interview affects self-report. Brain Injury 2006;20:1147–1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar