The use of discourse analyses for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults

References

• Sohlberg M. M., Mateer C. A. Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice. Guilford Press, New York 1989; 215
   Google Scholar
• Gardner H., Brownell H. H., Wapner W., . Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. Cognitive Processing in the Right Hemisphere, E. Perecman, et al. Academic Press, New York 1983; 169–191
   Google Scholar
• Trupe E., Hillis A. Paucity vs. verbosity: Another analysis of right hemisphere communication deficits. Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings, R. H. Brookshire. BRK Publishers, Minneapolis, MN 1985; 83–92
   Google Scholar
• Mackisack E. L., Myers P. S., Duffy J. R. Verbosity and labelling behaviour: The performance of right hemisphere and non-brain-damaged adults on an inferential picture description task. Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings, R. H. Brookshire. BRK Publishers, Minneapolis, MN 1987; 143–151
   Google Scholar
• Uryase D. Analysis and Description of Narrative Discourse in Right Hemisphere-Damaged Adults: A Comparison to Neurologically Normal and Left Hemisphere-Damaged Adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut. 1988
   Google Scholar
• Wapner W., Hamby S., Gardner H. The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language 1981; 14: 15–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottenberg D., Lemme M. L., Hedberg N. Analysis of oral narratives of normal and aphasic adults. Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings, R. H. Brookshire. BRK Publishers, Minneapolis, MN 1985; 241–247
   Google Scholar
• Ernest-Baron C. R., Brookshire R. H., Nicholas L. E. Story structure and retelling narratives by aphasic and non-brain-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987; 30: 44–49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemme M. L., Hedberg N., Bottenberg D. E. Cohesion in narratives of aphasic adults. Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings, R. H. Brookshire. BRK Publishers, Minneapolis, MN 1984; 215–222
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska H. K., North A. J., Macaluso-Haynes S. Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language 1981; 17: 345–371
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska H. K., Freedman-Stern R., Doyel A., et al. Production of narrative discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language 1983; 19: 317–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner W., Hamby S., Nicholas L. Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and non-coherent discourse by aphasic and non-aphasic listeners. Brain and Language 1984; 21: 37–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liles B. Z., Coelho C. A., Duffy R. J., et al. Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 356–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mentis M., Prutting C. A. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987; 30: 88–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wyckoff L. H. Narrative and Procedural Discourse Following Closed Head Injury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida. 1984
   Google Scholar
• Hunt K. Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1970; 35 (Serial No. 134)
   Google Scholar
• Halliday M. A.K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. Longman Group Ltd., London 1976
   Google Scholar
• Liles B. Z. Narrative ability in normal and language disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1985; 28: 123–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frederiksen C. H. Representing logical and semantic structures of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology 1975; 7: 371–458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N. S., Mandler J. M. A tale of two structures: underlying and surface forms in stories. Poetics 1980; 9: 51–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer B. J.F. Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behaviour 1975; 7: 7–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart D. E. Notes on a schema for stories. Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, D. G. Bobrow, A. M. Collins. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1975; 211–236
   Google Scholar
• Stein N X., Glenn C. G. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. New Directions in Discourse Processing, R. O. Frecdle. Ablex, Norwood, NJ 1979; Vol. II.: 53–120
   Google Scholar
• Thorndyke P. W. Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology 1977; 9: 77–110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndyke P. W., Yekovitch F. R. A critique of schemata as a theory of human story memory. Poetics 1980; 9: 23–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintch W., Van Dijk T. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 1978; 85: 363–394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Beukelman D. An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1980; 45: 27–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blank M., Franklin E. Dialogue with preschoolers: a cognitively-based system of assessment. Applied Psycholinguistics 1980; 1: 127–150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho C. A., Liles B. Z., Duffy R. J. Analysis of Conversational Discourse in Head-Injured Adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Blank M., Rose S. A., Berlin L. J. Preschool Language Assessment Instrument: The Assessment of Learning in Practice. Grune & Stratton, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Coelho C. A., Liles B. Z., Duffy R. J. Discourse Analyses in Closed Head-Injured Adults: Evidence For Differing Patterns of Deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, (in press).
   Google Scholar