Agreement of classification decisions using two measures of motor co-ordination in persons with a traumatic brain injury

References

• Schmitz T. J. Coordination assessment. Physical Rehabilitation.: Assessment and Treatment, 2nd edn, S. B. O'Sullivan, T. J. Schmitz. F. A. Davis, Philadelphia, PA 1988; 121–133
   Google Scholar
• Adams R. D., Victor M. Principles of Neurology, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York 1989; 73–75
   Google Scholar
• Grinker R. R., Sahs A. L. Neurology, 6th edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL 1966; 40–41
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson H. W. Principles of assessment. Cash's Textbook of Neurology for Physiotherapists, 4th edn, P. A. Downie. Faber & Faber, London 1986; 104–146
   Google Scholar
• Merbitz C., Morris J., Grip J. C. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1989; 70: 308–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein J. M. On defining subjective and objective measurements. Physical Therapy 1989; 69: 577–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaine B. R., Sullivan S. J. Reliability of the scores for the finger-to-nose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 71–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvln A. R., Tourtellotte W. W. Quantitative Examination of Neurological Functions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1985; vol. 1
   Google Scholar
• Smith S. S., Kondraske G. V. Computerized system for quantitative measurement of sensorimotor aspects of human performance. Physical Therapy 1987; 67: 1860–1868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondraske G. V., Potvin A. R., Tourtellotte W. W., et al. A computer based system for automated quantification of neurological function. IEEE Transactions in Biomedical Engineering 1984; 31: 401–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behbehani K., Kondraske G. V., Tintner R., et al. Evaluation of quantitative measures of upper extremity speed and coordination in healthy persons and in three patient populations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 106–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R. D., Donaldson I. M. Measurement of integrated sensory-motor function following brain damage by a computerized preview tracking task. International Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1981; 3: 71–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wise M. F., Kondraske G. V. Quantitative functional assessment and characterization of head injured patients. Proceedings of the 8th Annual RESNA Conference. 1985; 168–170
   Google Scholar
• Winstein C. J., Knecht H. G. Movement science and its relevance to physical therapy. Physical Therapy 1990; 70: 759–762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein J. M. Measurement in clinical practice.: theory and application. Measurement in Physical Therapy, J. M. Rothstein. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1985; 1–46
   Google Scholar
• Swaine B. R., Sullivan S. J. The relationship between clinical and instrumented measures of motor coordination in traumatically brain injured persons. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 55–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1954; 47: 381–391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenett B. Some aspects of prognosis after severe head injury. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1972; 4: 16–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Born J. D., Hans P., Dexters G., et al. Evaluation practique du dysfonctionnement cncéphalique chcz le traumatisé cranien. Neurochirurgie 1982; 28: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J., Rosenthal M. Rehabilitation of the patient with head injury. Rehabilitation Medicine. Principles and Practice, J. A. Dc Lisa. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA 1988; 585–611
   Google Scholar
• Drouin G., Vanier M., Dutil E., et al. The quantitative multidisciplinary evaluation of severe traumatically brain injured patients. A dream or a reality?. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1991; 4: 28–29
   Google Scholar
• Vanier M., Dutil E., Provost J., et al. Scqucllcs physiques ct psychologiques d'un traumatisme cranien grave et leur repercussions sur l'autonomie occupationclle et social. Medecine/Sciences 1993; 9: 624–629
   Google Scholar
• Kondraske G. V., Smith S. S., Mooney V., . Computerized measurement of human performance. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.: Quantifying Neurologic Performance, R. Davis, G. V. Kondraskc, W. W. Tourtcllotte, et al. Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia 1989; vol. 3: 9–30
   Google Scholar
• The investigation of rehabilitation for the brain injured. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1976; 8: 127–133
   Google Scholar
• Currier D. P. Elements of Research in Physical Therapy, 2nd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1984
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 37–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer L., Boch M. Residual sensorimotor deficits in the adult head-injured patient. Physical Therapy 1983; 63: 1988–1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held J. P., Mazeau M., Rooineau J. Les troubles de la mobilite et du langage chcz les traumatises craniens scveres. Annates de la Medecine Physique 1975; 18: 337–354
   Google Scholar
• Safrit M. J., Stamm C. L., Douglass J. A. The consistency of mastery classifications for a criterion referenced test of motor behaviour.: The effect of varying sample size. Journal of Human Movement Studies 1981; 7: 131–143
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C. Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York 1978
   Google Scholar