Phonological learning and lexicality of treated stimuli

References

• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (2000a). Lexical frequency effects on young children's imitative productions. In M. Broe, & J. Pierrehumbert ( Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V (pp. 207–217). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (2000b). The ontogeny of phonological categories and the primacy of lexical learning in linguistic development. Child Development, 71, 240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verb and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 73–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, M. (1996). Arthur's chicken pox: An Arthur adventure. New York: Little, Brown Books for Young Readers.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children's lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 17, 205–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W.J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2005). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, S. (2001). Crabby Gabby (R. James, Illus.). New York: Price Stern Sloan.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A. (1984). Methods and empirical issues in analyzing functional misarticulation. In: M. Elbert, D. A. Dinnsen, & G. Weismer ( Eds.), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child ( ASHA Monographs No. 22; pp. 5–17). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., Chin, S. B., Elbert, M., & Powell, T. W. (1990). Some constraints on functionally disordered phonologies: phonetic inventories and phonotactics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 28–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 421–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbert, M., & McReynolds, L. V. (1975). Transfer of /r/ across contexts. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 380–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbert, M., & McReynolds, L. V. (1978). An experimental analysis of misarticulating children's generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 136–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbert, M., & McReynolds, L. V. (1985). The generalization hypothesis: final consonant deletion. Language and Speech, 28, 281–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition: English initial consonants in the first fifty words. Language, 51, 419–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, M. E. (1992). Articulation and phonology: inextricable constructs in speech pathology. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. (1973). Goal: Carryover. Philadelphia: Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (1992). The conditions and course of clinically-induced phonological change. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1049–1063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2001). Complexity in phonological treatment: clinical factors. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2005). Phonological intervention: the how or the what? In A. G. Kamhi, & K. Pollack ( Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: Assessment and intervention (pp. 201–210). Philadelphia: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2007). Phonological complexity and language learnability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2008a). Fundamentals of experimental design and treatment. In D. A. Dinnsen, & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 93–118). London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2008b). Phonological disorders and the Developmental Phonology Archive. In D. A. Dinnsen, & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 37–92). London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1987). A functional analysis of phonological knowledge and generalization learning in misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 462–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., & Champion, A. H. (1999). Lexical constraints in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 26, 261–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., Hughes, M. T., & Rowland, S. (1996). Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., & Ziemer, S. (2009). Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., & Neumann, H. J. (1992). Teaching and learning /θ/: a nonconfound. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6, 191–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Simmerman, C. L., & Neumann, H. J. (1994). Phonemic structures of delayed phonological systems. Journal of Child Language, 21, 291–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 12, 395–427.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation (2nd ed). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. C., Dale, P., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, N., Gibbon, F., & Cohen-McKenzie, W. (1998). When is a velar an alveolar? Evidence supporting a revised psycholinguistic model of speech production in children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33, 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixon, M. U. (2004). Turtle's way: Loggy, Greeny, and Leather (S. J. Harris, Illus.). Melbourne Beach: Canmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, B. W., & Paden, E. P. (1983). Targeting intelligible speech: A phonological approach to remediation. Boston: College-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P. R., Shuckers, G., & Daniloff, R. G. (1989). Children's phonetic disorders: Theory and treatment. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals (A. R. Keiler, Trans.). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1978). The simultaneous-treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9, 912–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. P. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs, Part II: design selection and arrangement of experimental phases. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 204–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard, L. B. (1973). Referential effects on articulatory learning. Language and Speech, 16, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., & Ritterman, S. I. (1971). Articulation of /s/ as a function of cluster and word frequency of occurrence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 476–485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luce, P. A. (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 39, 155–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, J. (1980). Bad Thad (M. Alexander, Illus.). New York: Dutton Children's Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maye, J., & Gerken, L. (2000). Learning phonemes without minimal pairs. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas ( Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 522–533). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. J. (2002). A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V. (1972). Articulation generalization during articulation training. Language and Speech, 15, 149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Bennett, S. (1972). Distinctive feature generalization in articulation training. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 462–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Elbert, M. F. (1981). Generalization of correct articulation in clusters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. P. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore, MD: University Park.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, A. J., Hopkins, C. J., & Rush, R. T. (1982). The vocabulary of first-grade children. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Morrisette, M. L., & Gierut, J. A. (2002). Lexical organization and phonological change in treatment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 143–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B. (2001). Phonological pattern frequency and speech production in adults and children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 778–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Kurtz, B., & Windsor, J. (2005). The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1033–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition, 86, 157–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, H. C., Pisoni, D. B., & Davis, C. K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon ( Progress Report No. 10, pp. 357–376). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B. (1998). Treatment efficacy research. In C. M. Frattali ( Ed.), Measuring outcomes in speech-language pathology (pp. 134–150). New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W., & Elbert, M. (1984). Generalization following the remediation of early- and later-developing consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 211–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2003). Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology, 39, 484–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. G., & Leonard, L. B. (1982). Do children pick and choose? An examination of phonological selection and avoidance in early lexical acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 9, 319–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shames, G. H. (1957). Use of the nonsense-syllable in articulation therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Sciences, 22, 261–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D. (1980). An intervention procedure for children with persistent /r/ errors. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 11, 102–110.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D. (1993). Four new speech and prosody-voice measures for genetics research and other studies in developmental phonological disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 105–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C. (1998). Sounds and words in early language acquisition: the relationship between lexical and phonological development. In R.P. D. Paul ( Ed.), Exploring the speech-language connection (Vol. 8, pp. 25–52). Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C., & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C., & Dunn, C. (1985). Normal and disordered phonology in children. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1321–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2003). Learning new words II: phonotactic probability in verb learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1312–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2004a). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2004b). Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1454–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2006). Do children still pick and choose? The relationship between phonological knowledge and lexical acquisition beyond 50 words. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., Armbrüster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1175–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., & Morrisette, M. L. (2002). The lexicon and phonology: interactions in language acquisition. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 24–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., & McReynolds, L. V. (1986). Wh interrogative production in agrammatic aphasia: an experimental analysis of auditory-visual stimulation and direct-production treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 193–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Riper, C. (1963). Speech correction: Principles and methods. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). Tongue twisters reveal neighborhood density effects in speech production. Research on Spoken Language Processing, 21, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002a). Influence of onset density on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 270–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002b). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 487–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 514–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9, 325–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 481–487.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Auer, E. T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winitz, H. (1975). From syllable to conversation. Baltimore: University Park.
   Google Scholar
• Zamuner, T. S., Gerken, L., & Hammond, M. (2004). Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production. Journal of Child Language, 31, 515–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar