Triangulating speech sound generalization

References

• Baker, E., & McLeod, S. (2004). Evidence-based management of phonological impairment in children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20, 261–285.
   Google Scholar
• Bankson, N. W., & Byrne, M. C. (1972). The effect of a timed correct sound production task on carryover. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 160–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernhardt, B. (2004). Editorial: maximizing success in phonological intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20, 195–198.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein Ratner, N. (2006). Evidence-based practice: an examination of its ramifications for the practice of speech-language pathology. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 257–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, C. (2009). Children's speech sound disorders. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Broomfield, J., & Dodd, B. (2005). Clinical effectiveness. In B. Dodd ( Ed.), Differential diagnosis and treatment of children with speech disorder. 2nd ed. (pp. 211–229). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Camarata, S. (1993). The application of naturalistic conversation training to speech production in children with speech disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & Elbert, M. (1984). On the relationship between phonology and learning. In M. Elbert, D. A. Dinnsen, & G. Weismer ( Eds.), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child. ASHA Monographs No. 22 (pp. 59–68). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, B. (2007). Evidence-based practice and speech-language pathology: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Folia Phoniatica et Logopaedica, 59, 118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollaghan, C. A. (2007). The handbook of evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Elbert, M., Dinnsen, D. A., & Powell, T. W. (1984). On the prediction of phonologic generalization learning patterns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 309–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbert, M., Dinnsen, D. A., Swartzlander, P., & Chin, S. B. (1990). Generalization to conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 694–699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbert, M., & Gierut, J. A. (1986). Handbook of clinical phonology: approaches to assessment and treatment. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elbert, M., & McReynolds, L. V. (1985). The generalization hypothesis: final consonant deletion. Language and Speech, 28, 281–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbert, M., Powell, T. W., & Swartzlander, P. (1991). Toward a technology of generalization: how many exemplars are sufficient? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 81–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elbert, M., Shelton, R. L., & Arndt, W. B. (1967). A task for evaluation of articulation change: 1. Development of methodology. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 281–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ertmer, D. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (1998). Constructivist strategies in phonological intervention: facilitating self-regulation for carryover. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2001). Complexity in phonological treatment: clinical factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2007). Phonological complexity and language learnability. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1987). A functional analysis of phonological knowledge and generalization learning in misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 462–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., Hughes, M. T., & Rowland, S. (1996). Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 215–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. A. (2008). Integration of evidence-based practice into the university clinic. Topics in Language Disorders, 28, 200–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. R. (2005). Re: Law, Garrett, and Nye (2004a). ‘The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis’ [Letter to the editor]. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 48, 1114–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamhi, A. G. (2006). Treatment decisions for children with speech-sound disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamhi, A. G., & Pollock, K. E. (2005). Phonological disorders in children: Clinical decision making in assessment and intervention. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, S. (2007). Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Johnson, L. (2008). Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: evidence from well-defined categories. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 389–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., & Costello Ingham, J. (1986). Programming rapid generalization of correct articulation through self-monitoring procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 24–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lass, N. J., & Pannbacker, M. (2008). The application of evidence-based practice to nonspeech oral motor treatments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 408–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lof, G. L., & Watson, M. M. (2008). A nationwide survey of nonspeech oral motor exercise use: implications for evidence-based practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 392–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V. (1987). A perspective on articulation generalization. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8, 217–239.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Bennett, S. (1972). Distinctive feature generalization in articulation training. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 462–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miccio, A. W. (1995). A spectral moments analysis of the acquisition of word-initial voiceless fricatives in children with normal and disordered phonologies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W. (2005). Components of phonological assessment. In A. G. Kamhi, & K. E. Pollock ( Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 35–42). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W., & Elbert, M. (1996). Enhancing stimulability: a treatment program. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 335–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W., Elbert, M., & Forrest, K. (1999a). The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W., & Powell, T. W. (1999). Making generalization happen. Presentation at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco, CA, November.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio, A. W., & Williams, A. L. (2010). Stimulability treatment. In A. L. Williams, S. McLeod, & R. J. McCauley ( Eds.), Interventions for speech sound disorders in children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio A. W., Yont, K. M., Landefeld H., Nelson C., Stubblebine J. (1999b). Generalization patterns following treatment to enhance stimulability for phonological acquisition. Paper presented at the seventh symposium of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association, Montréal, Québec, Canada, May.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W. (1990). Planning for phonological generalization: an approach to treatment target selection. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W. (2008). The use of nonspeech oral motor treatments for developmental speech sound production disorders: interventions and interactions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 374–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1991). Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1318–1328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powell, T. W., Elbert, M., Miccio, A. W., Strike-Roussos, C., & Brasseur, J. (1998). Facilitating [s] production in young children: an experimental evaluation of motoric and conceptual treatment approaches. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 12, 127–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W., & Miccio, A. W. (1996). Stimulability: a useful clinical tool. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 237–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. W., Miccio, A. W., Elbert, M., Brasseur, J., & Strike-Roussos, C. (1999). Patterns of sound change in children with phonological disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 13, 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, S., Douglas, J., & Oates, J. (2004). Evidence-based practice in speech pathology. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Rvachew, S., & Nowak, M. (2001). The effect of target selection strategy on sound production learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 610–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rvachew, S., Rafaat, S., & Martin, M. (1999). Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, R. L. (1978). The use of research in the development of clinical services for individuals with speech disorders: a discussion of McReynold's paper. In J. R. Kavanagh, & W. Strange ( Eds.), Speech and language in the laboratory, school, and clinic (pp. 165–178). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1987). A retrospective study of spontaneous generalization in speech-delayed children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 144–157.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1990). Self-monitoring and generalization in preschool speech-delayed children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 21, 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Lewis, B. A., Tomblin, J. B., McSweeny, J. L., Karlsson, H. B., & Scheer, A. R. (2005). Toward diagnostic and phenotype markers for genetically transmitted speech delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 834–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton, S. (2004). Concurrent task sequencing in single-phoneme phonologic treatment and generalization. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 131–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2007). Complexity in language learning and treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 3–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 30–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Kiran, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: the complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 591–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. A. (2005). Promoting generalization: selecting, scheduling, and integrating goals. In A. G. Kamhi, & K. E. Pollock ( Eds.), Phonological disorders in children: clinical decision making in assessment and intervention (pp. 67–75.Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. A. (2006). Commentary on ‘Treatment decisions for children with speech-sound disorders’: revisiting the past in EBP. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 280–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, A. A. (2008). What works: evidence-based intervention for children with speech sound disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 320–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, A. A., Edwards, M. L., & Saxman, J. H. (1990). Acoustic validation of phonological knowledge and its relationship to treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 251–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyler, A. A., & Lewis, K. E. (2005). Relationships among consistency/variability and other phonological measures over time. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (1991). Generalization patterns associated with training least phonological knowledge. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 722–733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, A. L. (2005). Assessment, target selection, and intervention. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. L. Williams, S. McLeod, & R. J. McCauley ( Eds.) (2010). Interventions for speech sound disorders in children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar