Verbal inflection, articles and object clitics in Italian specific language impairment

References

• Bisiacchi, P.S., Cendron, M., Gugliotta, M., Tressoldi, P.E., & Vio, C. (2005). BVN 5–11 Batteria di valutazione neuropsicologica per l'età evolutiva. Trento, Italy: Erickson.
   Google Scholar
• Bortolini, U., Arfé, B., Caselli, M.C., Degasperi, L., Deevy, P., & Leonard, L.B. (2006). Clinical marker for specific language impairment in Italian: the contribution of clitics and non-word repetition. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 695–712. doi: 10.1080/13682820600570831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini, U., & Leonard, L. (1996). Phonology and grammatical morphology in specific language impairment: Accounting for individual variation in English and Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 85–104. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400009474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, P., Cipriani, P., Chilosi, A.M., & Pfanner, L. (2001). The Italian determiner system in normal acquisition, specific language impairment, and childhood aphasia. Brain and language, 77, 283–293. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilosi, A.M., Cipriani, P., & Fapore, T. (2002). I disturbi specifici del linguaggio. In S. Vicari & M.C. Caselli ( Eds.), I disturbi dello sviluppo (pp. 59–76). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Cipriani, P., Chilosi, A.M., Bottari, P., & Pfanner, L. (1993). L'acquisizione della morfosintassi in italiano: fasi e processi. Padua, Italy: Unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., Bartke, S., & Göllner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 151–171. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(97)00006-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, M. (2000). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, K. (2003). Diagnostic criteria of developmental apraxia of speech used by clinical speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 376–380. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/083).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, M., & Goad, H. (1997). What underlies inflectional error patterns in genetic dysphasia? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 109–137. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(97)00003-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grela, B. (2003). Production-based theories may account for subject omission in both normal children and children with SLI: A case study. Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 27, 221–228.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, M.T. (2002). Language Acquisition. The growth of grammar. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guendouzi, J. (2003). SLI, a generic category of language impairment that emerges from specific differences: a case study of two individual linguistic profiles. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 135–152. doi:10.1080/0269920031000061803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordaan, H., Shaw-Ridley, G., Serfontein, J., Orelwitz, K., & Mongahan, N. (2001). Cognitive and linguistic profiles of specific language impairment and semantic-pragmatic disorder in bilinguals. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 53, 153–165. doi: 10.1159/000052670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. (1998). Specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M.C., & Sabbadini, L. (1993). The use of article by Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 7, 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorato, M.C., & Roch, M. (2007). TOR 3–8 – Test di comprensione del testo orale. Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, H., & Friedmann, N. (2009). Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. First language, 29, 15–50. doi: 10.1177/0142723708097815.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwek, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.F., & Chapman, R.S. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 24, 154–(161).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orsini, A. (1993). Standardized for Italian children. WISC-R. Contributo alla taratura italiana. Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, A., & Picone, L. (1996). Standardized for Italian children. WPSSI. Contributo alla taratura italiana. Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, A., & Picone, L. (2006). Standardised for Italian children. WISC-III. Contributo alla taratura italiana. Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzuto, E., & Caselli, M. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: Implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 491–557. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900011557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. (1997). Bus Story Test – a test of narrative speech. Milton Keynes, England: Speechmark.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M.L., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P.L. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850–863.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuele, C.M., & Dykes, J.C. (2005). Complex syntax acquisition: A longitudinal case study of a child with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 295–318. doi: 10.1080/02699200410001703709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella, G., Pizzoli, C., & Tressoldi, P.E. (2000). Standardized for Italian speakers. Peabody – Test di Vocabolario Recettivo – PPVT-R. Turin, Italy: Omega.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, V., Gavarró, A., & Wexler, K. (2004). Feature checking and object clitic omission in child Spanish and Catalan. In R. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, B. Kampers-Manhe, & P. Sleeman ( Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2004 (pp. 253–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M.T., & Pierpont, E.I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399–433. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00109452.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely, H. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from grammatical specific language impairment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1967). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, K. (2004). Lenneberg's dream: Learning, normal language development and specific language impairment. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein ( Eds.), Variations and Universals in Biolinguistics (pp. 239–297). Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, K., Schütze, C.T., & Rice, M. (1998). Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tns Omission Model. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 7, 317–344. Retrieved from http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/692324_786916639_785042166.pdf
   Google Scholar