On the interaction of velar fronting and labial harmony

References

• Barlow, J. A. (2007). Grandfather effects: a longitudinal case study of the phonological acquisition of intervocalic consonants in English. Language Acquisition, 14, 121–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, B. H., & Stemberger, J. P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development from the perspective of constraint-based non-linear phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verb and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 73–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camarata, S. M., & Gandour, J. (1984). On describing idiosyncratic phonologic systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 262–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coetzee, A., & Pater, J. (in press). The place of variation in phonological theory. In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. Yu ( Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (2nd ed.). Oxford UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• de Lacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A. (1985). A re-examination of phonological neutralization. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 265–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A. (2008a). Fundamentals of optimality theory. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 3–36). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A. (2008b). Recalcitrant error patterns. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 247–276). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A. (2008c). A typology of opacity effects in acquisition. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 121–176). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., Barlow, J. A., & Morrisette, M. L. (1997). Long-distance place assimilation with an interacting error pattern in phonological acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 11(4), 319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2008a). An opacity-tolerant conspiracy in phonological acquisition. In A. W. Farris-Trimble & D. A. Dinnsen ( Eds.), Phonological opacity effects in optimality theory (pp. 99–118). Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2008b). The prominence paradox. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 277–308). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2008c). An unusual error pattern reconsidered. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 177–204). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2009). Developmental shifts in phonological strength relations. In K. Nasukawa & P. Backley ( Eds.), Phonological strength (pp. 113–149). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., Gierut, J. A., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2010a). Comparative markedness and induced opacity. Language Research, 46, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., Green, C. R., & Farris-Trimble, A. W. (2010b). On the interaction of deaffrication and consonant harmony. Journal of Child Language, doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990572.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., Green, C. R., Gierut, J. A., & Morrisette, M. L. ( in press). On the anatomy of a chain shift. Journal of Linguistics, doi: 10.1017/S0022226710000368.
   Google Scholar
• Dinnsen, D. A., & O'Connor, K. M. (2001). Implicationally-related error patterns and the selection of treatment targets. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition: English initial consonants in the first fifty words. Language, 51, 419–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (1986). Sound change: a phonemic split in a misarticulating child. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierut, J. A. (2008). Phonological disorders and the Developmental Phonology Archive. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 37–92). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980a). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 12, 395–427.
   Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980b). Meaning-dependent ratings of imagery, age of acquisition, familiarity, and concreteness for 387 ambiguous words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 12, 428–450.
   Google Scholar
• Goad, H. (1997). Consonant harmony in child language: an optimality theoretic account. In S. J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten ( Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (1986). Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwell, P. (1982). Clinical phonology. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. (1989). Phonological disability in children (2nd ed.). London: Cole and Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Inkelas, S., & Rose, Y. (2007). Positional neutralization: a case study from child language. Language, 83, 707–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P. (1965). Phonological change. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 1–91). Seoul: Hanshin.
   Google Scholar
• Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, T. (2010). Convergence and divergence of perception and production in phonological acquisition. Paper presented at the 18th Manchester Phonology Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. J. (2002). Comparative markedness. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-489.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1994). The emergence of the unmarked: optimality in prosodic morphology. In M. Gonzàlez ( Ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 24, 333–379. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Elbert, M. (1981). Criteria for phonological process analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 197–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrisette, M. L., Dinnsen, D. A., & Gierut, J. A. (2003). Markedness and context effects in the acquisition of place features. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 329–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrisette, M. L., & Gierut, J. A. (2008). Innovations in the treatment of chain shifts. In D. A. Dinnsen & J. A. Gierut ( Eds.), Optimality theory, phonological acquisition and disorders (pp. 205–220). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pater, J., & Werle, A. (2003). Direction of assimilation in child consonant harmony. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48, 385–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Lof, G. L. (1991). Reliability studies in broad and narrow transcription. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 5, 225–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, A. B. (1993). Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Articulation Norms Project: consonant singletons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 533–547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smolensky, P. (1996). The initial state and ‘Richness of the base’ in optimality theory. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-154.
   Google Scholar
• Stoel-Gammon, C., & Stemberger, J. P. (1994). Consonant harmony and phonological underspecification in child speech. In M. Yavaş ( Ed.), First and second language phonology (pp. 63–80). San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: its scope and function in child language. In J. H. Greenberg ( Ed.), Universals of human language 2: Phonology (pp. 281–334). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weismer, G. (1984). Acoustic analysis strategies for the refinement of phonological analysis. In M. Elbert, D. A. Dinnsen, & G. Weismer ( eds.), Phonological theory and the misarticulating child (asha monographs no. 22), 30–52. Rockville, MD: ASHA.
   Google Scholar