377
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Production of tongue twisters by speakers with partial glossectomy

, , &
Pages 951-964 | Received 17 Dec 2013, Accepted 23 Jun 2014, Published online: 21 Jul 2014

References

  • Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3.2, 12–28
  • Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278
  • Beck, J. M., Wrench, A., lackson, M., Soutar, D., Robertson, A. G., & Laver, J. (1998). Surgical mapping and phonetic analysis in intra-oral cancer. In W. Ziegler & K. Deger (Eds.), Clinical phonetics and linguistics (pp. 481–492). London: Whurr
  • Bressmann, T., Jacobs, H., Quintero, J., & Irish, J. C. (2009). Speech outcomes for partial glossectomy surgery: Measures of speech articulation and listener perception. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 33, 204–210
  • Bressmann, T., Ackloo, E., Heng, C.-L., & Irish, J. C. (2007). Quantitative three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of partially resected tongues. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 136, 799–805
  • Bressmann, T., Heng, C.-L., & Irish, J. C. (2005). Applications of 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging in speech-language pathology. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 29, 158–168
  • Dagenais, P. A., Adlington, L. M., & Evans, K. J. (2011). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and acceptability of dysarthric speech by older and younger listeners. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 37–48
  • Davidson, L. (2006). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 407–415
  • Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2007). Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition, 103, 386–412
  • Goozée, J. V., Stephenson, D. K., Murdoch, B. E., Darnell, R. E., & Lapointe, L. L. (2005). Lingual kinematic strategies used to increase speech rate: Comparison between younger and older adults. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 319–334
  • Gotzke, C. L., & Hodge, M. M. (2005). Relationship between measures of intelligibility and phonetic accuracy in children with and without cleft palate. Canadian Acoustics – Acoustique Canadienne, 33, 80–81
  • Gu, C. (2013). Smoothing spline ANOVA models (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag
  • Hodge, M., & Gotzke, C. L. (2007). Preliminary results of an intelligibility measure for english-speaking children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 44, 163–174
  • Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446
  • Kaipa, R., Robb, M. P., O'Beirne, G. A., & Allison, R. S. (2012). Recovery of speech following total glossectomy: An acoustic and perceptual appraisal. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 24–34
  • Kimata, Y., Sakuraba, M., Hishinuma, S., Ebihara, S., Hayashi, R., Asakage, T., Nakatsuka, T., & Harii, K. (2003). Analysis of the relations between the shape of the reconstructed tongue and postoperative functions after subtotal or total glossectomy. Laryngoscope, 113, 905–909
  • Konstantinovic, V. S., & Dimic, N. D. (1998). Articulatory function and tongue mobility after surgery followed by radiotherapy for tongue and floor of the mouth cancer patients. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 51, 589–593
  • McMillan, C. T., & Corley, M. (2010). Cascading influences on the production of speech: Evidence from articulation. Cognition, 117, 243–260
  • Mielke, J., Olson, K. S., Baker, A., & Archangeli, D. (2011). Articulation of the Kagayanen interdental approximant: An ultrasound study. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 403–412
  • Mielke, J., Baker, A., & Archangeli, D. (2010). Variability and homogeneity in American English /r/ allophony and /s/ retraction. In C. Fougeron & N. Nguyen (Eds.), Lab Phon 10: Variation, detail, and representation (pp. 699–719). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
  • Mosier, K., Liu, W.-C., Behin, B., Lee, C., & Baredes, S. (2005). Cortical adaptation following partial glossectomy with primary closure: Implications for reconstruction of the oral tongue. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 114, 681–687
  • Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1976). Laboratory induction of verbal slips: A new method for psycholinguistic research. Communication Quarterly, 24, 28–34
  • Murano, E. Z., Shinagawa, H., Zhuo, J., Gullapalli, R. P., Ord, R. A., Prince, J. L., & Stone, M. (2010). Application of diffusion tensor imaging after glossectomy. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 143, 304–306
  • Nicoletti, G., Soutar, D. S., Jackson, M. S., Wrench, A. A., Robertson, G., & Robertson, C. (2004). Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment for oral cancer: Experience from 196 selected cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 113, 114–125
  • Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Memory and Cognition, 38, 1147–1160
  • Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106, 528–537
  • Ostry, D. J., & Munhall, K. G. (1985). Control of rate and duration of speech movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 640–648
  • Pouplier, M. (2007). Tongue kinematics during utterances elicited with the SLIP technique. Language and Speech, 50, 311–341
  • Rastadmehr, O., Bressmann, T., Smyth, B., & Irish, J. C. (2008). Increased midsagittal tongue velocity as indication of articulatory compensation in patients with lateral partial glossectomies. Head and Neck, 30, 718–726
  • Whitehill, T. L., Ciocca, V., Chan, J. C.-T., & Samman, N. (2006). Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 135–140
  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.