Promises and pitfalls of machine scoring of the Index of Productive Syntax

References

• Costanza-Smith, A. (2010). The clinical utility of language samples. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 17, 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, M. A., He, C., Brown, C., Naçi, L., & Brown, J. (2006). How complex is that sentence? A proposed revision of the Rosenberg and Abbeduto D-level scale. CASPR Research Report 2006-1. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, Artificial Intelligence Center.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D., Fletcher, P., & Garman, M. (1976). The grammatical analysis of language disability. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hadley, P. A., & Short, H. (2005). The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1344–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanali, K., Liu, Y., Iglesias, A., Solorio, T., & Dollaghan, C. (2014). Automatic generation of the index of productive syntax for child language transcripts. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, J. J. (2010). Myths and realities of language sample analysis. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 17, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, S. H. (2001). About time: a comparison of computerized and manual procedures for grammatical and phonological analysis. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15, 399–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, S. H., & Channell, R. W. (2001). Accuracy of four language analysis procedures performed automatically. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 180–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X. (2009). Automatic measurement of syntactic complexity in child language acquisition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubetich, S., & Sagae, K. (2014). Data-driven measurement of child language development with simple syntactic templates. Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 2151–2160).
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2014). Re: IPSyn coding [Online forum comment]. Retrieved May 27, from https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/chibolts/uoH3ckm9oiQ/Lm3jjrqFjjYJ
   Google Scholar
• Maillart, C., Parisse, C., & Tommerdahl, J. (2012). F-LARSP 1.0: An adaptation of the LARSP language profile for French. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26, 188–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), Instructional Version 2012 [Computer Software]. Middleton, WI: SALT Software, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, M. J., Weismer, S., E., Evans, J. L., & Lindstrom, M. J. (2007). Longitudinal relationships between lexical and grammatical development in typical and late-talking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 508–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, L., Dahlsgaard, K., & Roberts, J. (2000). Late-talking toddlers: MLU and IPSyn outcomes at 3;0 and 4;0. Journal of Child Language, 27, 643–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispoli, M., & Hadley, P. (2001). The leading edge: The significance of sentence disruptions in the development of grammar. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1131–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, P. R., & Snow, C. E. (1998). Shared attention and grammatical development in typical children and children with autism. Journal of Child Language, 25, 653–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., & Abbeduto, L. (1987). Indicators of linguistic competence in the peer group conversational behavior of mildly retarded adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagae, K., Lavie, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Automatic measurement of syntactic development in child language. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 197–204).
   Google Scholar
• Sahakian, S., & Snyder, B. (2013), Modeling child divergences from adult grammar. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar