Refinement of the Low Vision Independence Measure: A Qualitative Study

REFERENCES

• American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process ( 2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 625–683.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker, S.W., Lambert, R.W., Schulz, E.M., Wright, B.D. & Burnet, D.L. (1985). An instrument to measure the activity level of the blind. International Journal of Rehabilitative Research, 8(4), 415–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, A.M., Bunce, C., Dickinson, C., Harper, R., Tudor-Edwards, R., Woodhouse, M., (2012). How effective is low vision service provision? A systemic review. Survey of Ophthalmology, 57(1), 34–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmedi, D., Becker, S., Heyl, V., Wahl, H.W. & Himmelsbach, I. (2002). Behavioral consequences of age-related low vision: A narrative review. Visual Impairment Research, 4(1), 15–45.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2002). Program memorandum intermediaries/carriers. Transmittal AB-02078. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services. Retrieved from http://www.cms.gov/Transmittals/downloads/AB03077.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Classen, S. & Velozo, C. (2014). Critiquing assessments. In: B.A. Boyt Schell, G. Gillen and M. Scaffa (Eds.), Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy (12th ed.), pp. 302–321. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff, S. (2002). Focus group discussions as a tool for developing a health education programme for elderly persons with visual impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9(1), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Sonn, U. & Svensson, E. (2001). Development of an ADL instrument targeting elderly persons with age-related macular degeneration. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23(2), 69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. (2004). Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology, 112(4), 477–485. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, K. & Kviz, F.J. (2006). Survey research design. In: G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Research in occupational therapy, pp. 91–109. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Gaiser, T.J. (2008). Online focus groups. In: N. Fielding, R.M. Lee and G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for analysis and application (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M.P. & Baker, S.S. (2011). Evaluation and intervention for basic and instrumental activities of daily living. In: M. Warren and E.A. Barstow (Eds.), Occupational therapy interventions for adults with low vision, pp. 227–267. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Doorduyn, K., Reeves, B. & Slater, L. (1999). Evaluating the outcome of low vision rehabilitation.Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 19(1), 3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haymes, S.A., Johnston, A.W. & Heyes, A.D. (2001). The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: A measure of vision disability. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 42(6), 1215–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, D.N., Babcock, J.L., Goodrich, G.L. & Boyless, J.A. (2000). A geriatric assessment of functional status in vision rehabilitation. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 9(6), 307–321.
   Google Scholar
• Kimberlin, C.L. & Winterstein, A.G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health System Pharmacists, 65(23), 2276–2284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, T., Barbour, R. & Harris, J. (2007). Using focus groups in disability research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(5), 690–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, R.G., Crews, J.E. & Mancil, R. (2000). Creating measures of rehabilitation outcomes for people who are visually impaired: The FIMBA project. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 94(5), 292–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangione, C.M., Phillips, R.S., Seddon, J.M., Lawrence, M.G., Cook, E.F., Dailey, R., (1992). Development of the ‘Activities of Daily Vision Scale’: A measure of visual functional status. Medical Care, 30(12), 1111–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massof, R.W., Ahmadian, L., Grover, L.L., Deremeik, J.T., Goldstein, J.E., Rainey, C., (2007). The activity inventory: An adaptive visual function questionnaire. Optometry and Vision Science, 84(8), 763–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Eye Institute. (2011). What you should know about low vision. Retrieved from http://www.nei.nih.gov/health/lowvision/LowVisPatBro2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pesudovs, K. & Coster, D.J. (1998). An instrument for assessment of subjective visual disability in cataract patients. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 82(6), 617–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, G., Saw, C., Lamoureux, L. & Keeffe, E. (2007). Self-management programs for adults with low vision: Needs and challenges. Patient Education and Counseling, 69, 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, D. & Hannah, S. (1998). An instrument evaluation framework: Description and application to assessments of hand function. Journal of Hand Therapy, 11, 266–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sight Connection (n.d.). Information about vision loss and the major causes. Retrieved from http://www.sightconnection.org/low-vision-rehabilitation/vision-loss-causes-information/
   Google Scholar
• Smart, A.D. (2006). A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 18(5), 377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T.M. (2009). Smith's Low Vision Independence Measure (LVIM). Unpublished instrument.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T.M., Glasson, H.E., Tioseco, T., & Welborn, K. (April, 2009). Development of an ADL Independence Assessment for Person's with Low Vision. Poster Presentation at the AOTA National Conference, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Stancanelli, J. (2010). Conducting an online focus group. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 761–765.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, E.P., Tielsch, J.M., Schein, O.D., Javitt, J.C., Sharkey, P., Cassard, S.D., et al. (1994). The VF-14: An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Archives of Ophthalmology, 112(5), 630–638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). The next four decades: The older population in the United States 2010 to 2050. Population Estimates and Projections. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p25–1138.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In: D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice, pp. 177–199. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar