Evaluation of the Intraocular Pressure Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer

REFERENCES

• Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998a;126:487–497. Erratum in: Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1998b;126: 498–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:701–713; discussion 829–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leske MC. The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1983;118:166–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1389–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan AJ, Harper J, Hosking SL, Gilmartin B. The effect of corneal thickness and corneal curvature on pneumatonometer measurements. Curr Eye Res 2002;25:107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakre BM, Doughty MJ, Dalane OV, et al. Assessment of reproducibility of measures of intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in young white adults over a 16-h time period. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003;23:271–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Herndon LW, Asrani SG, Stinnett S, Allingham RR. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1117–1121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan-Mee M, Pham F. Correspondence of Tono-Pen intraocular pressure measurements performed at the central cornea and mid-peripheral cornea. Optometry 2004;75:26–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, et al. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology 1998;105:969–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh TA, Adams M, McDermott B, Claridge KG, Ewings P. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:516–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Jonuscheit S. Effect of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry measures - a different result with different pachymeters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1603–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology 2007;114:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:85–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714–20; discussion 829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 2007;16:581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O’Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:990–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas MO, et al. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:341–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Chui WS. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:909–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3026–3031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Méijome JM, Queirós A, Jorge J, Díaz-Rey A, Parafita MA. Intraoffice variability of corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP). Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:457–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N, et al. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:968–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, et al. Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, et al. Ocular Response Analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1661–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen M, Fan F, Xue A, et al. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res 2008;48:2167–2171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerautret J, Colin J, Touboul D, Roberts C. Biomechanical characteristics of the ectatic cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:510–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuehi KC. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer. Clin Exp Optom 2006;89:310–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocker FW. On changes in intraocular pressure after application of the tonometer; in the same eye and in the other eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;45:192–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses RA, Liu CH. Repeated applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1968;66: 89–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen PN. The noncontact tonometer. Clinical evaluation on normal and diseased eyes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:513–521.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chauhan BC, Henson DB. Clinical evaluation of the non-contact Tonometer Mark II. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:751–756.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bynke HG, Schele B. On the origin of the ocular pressure pulse. Ophthalmologica 1967;153:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydhecker W. The intraocular pressure. Clinical aspects. Ann Ophthalmol 1976;8:389–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perkins ES. The ocular pulse. Curr Eye Res 1981;1:19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuehi KC, Almubrad TM. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JH, Kripke DF, Twa MD, et al. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in the aging population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2912–2917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. BRM 2007;39:175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4410–4414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;24:211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar