REFERENCES
- Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:349–355.
- Javadi MA, Feizi S, Yazdani S, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: A clinical trial. Cornea. 2010;29:365–371.
- Feizi S, Javadi MA, Jamali H, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus: Big-bubble technique. Cornea. 2010;29:177–182.
- Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:159–165.
- Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, et al. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1676–1682.
- Jadavi MA, Feizi S, Mirbabaee F, et al. Relaxing incisions combined with adjustment sutures for post-deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus. Cornea. 2009;28:1130–1134.
- Feizi S, Javadi MA, Kanavi MR. Cellular changes of donor corneal tissue after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus: A confocal study. Cornea. 2010;29:866–870.
- Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1371–1375.
- Hurmeric V, Sahin A, Ozge G, et al. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes. Cornea. 2010;29:641–649.
- Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156–162.
- Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, et al. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:257–262.
- Yenerel NM, Kucumen RB, Gorgun E. Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2010;29:1247–1251.
- Shin JY, Choi JS, Oh JY, et al. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using the ocular response analyzer. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24:139–142.
- John T, Taylor DA, Shimmyo M, et al. Corneal hysteresis following descemetorhexis with endokeratoplasty: Early results. Ann Ophthalmol. 2007;39:9–14.
- Elsheikh A, Ross S, Alhasso D, et al. Numerical study of the effect of corneal layered structure on ocular biomechanics. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34:26–35.
- Schweitzer C, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, et al. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2403–2410.
- Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, et al. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea. 2001;20:834–838.
- Lisle C, Ehlers N. A clinical comparison of the Xpert non-contact tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer after penetrating keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78:211–215.
- Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, et al. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:215–221.
- Shen M, Wang J, Qu J, et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1185–1192.
- Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: Relevance in clinical context. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006;34:114–118.