Reliability of Nucleus-To-Cell and Nucleus-To-Cytoplasm Calculations for Conjunctival Impression Cytology Specimens

REFERENCES

• McKelvie P. Ocular surface impression cytology. Adv Anat Pathol. 2003;10:328–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calonge M, Diebold Y, Sáez V, et al. Impression cytology of the ocular surface: a review. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78: 457–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopin E, Deveney T, Asbell PA. Impression cytology: Recent advances and applications in dry eye disease. Ocular Surf. 2009;7:93–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. The corneal and conjunctival surfaces in relation to the tear film. In−The Tear Film (Korb DR, ed). Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2002, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Contact lens wear and the development of squamous metaplasia of the surface cells of the conjunctiva. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37: 274–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD, Wright JC. Impression cytology of the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. In: The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear (Holly FJ, ed). Dry Eye Institute, Lubbock, TX, 1986, pp. 140–156.
   Google Scholar
• Blades K, Doughty MJ. Comparison of grading schemes to quantitative assessments of nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratios for human bulbar conjunctival cells collected by impression cytology. Curr Eye Res. 2000;20:335–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Matsumoto Y, Dogru M, Tsubota K. The application of in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy as a tool of conjunctival in vivo cytology in the diagnosis of dry eye ocular surface disease. Mol Vision. 2010;16:2457–2464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Matsumoto Y, Ibrahim OMA, et al. In vivo evaluation of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis using laser scanning confocal microscopy and conjunctival impression cytology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3986–3992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Objective assessment of conjunctival squamous metaplasia by measures of cell and nucleus dimensions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39:409–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. Assessment of agreement for assignment of a normal grade to human conjunctival impression cytology samples. Cytopathology. 2010;21:320–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Blades KA, Ibrahim N. Assessment of the number of eye symptoms, and the impact of some confounding variables, for office staff in non-air-conditioned buildings. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002; 22:143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JD. Impression cytology. Cornea. 1988;7:71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld WJ, Boon ME (1981) Fluctuations in nuclear and cytoplasmic size of vaginal and buccal epithelial cells reflect the time of the ovulation as well as the time of the day. Progr Clin Biol Res. 1981;59:109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Boon ME, Löwhagen T, Willems J-S. Planimetric studies on fine needle aspirates from follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. Acta Cytol. 1980;24:145–148.
   Google Scholar
• Boon ME, Kurver P, Baak JPA, Oooms ECM. Morphometric differences between urothelial cells in voided urine of patients with grade I and grade II bladder tumours. J Clin Pathol. 1981;34:612–615.
   Google Scholar
• Baak JPA, Kurver PHJ, Boon ME.Computer-aided application of quantitative microscopy in diagnostic pathology. Pathol Annu. 1982;17:287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen JA, Skaarland E. Nuclear and cell area measurements in the cytological evaluation of pleural effusions: a study of subjective assessments and morphometric measurements. Diag Cytopathol. 1987;3:50–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw AA, Madge R, Jiroutek M, Granter SR. Bile duct brushing cytology. Statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;110:635–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop JW, Sims KL. Cellular morphometry in nongynecologic thin-layer and filter cytologic specimens. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1998;20:257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Elzagheid A, Collan Y. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast. Value of nuclear morphometry after different sampling methods. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2003;25:73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Arora B, Seita S, Rekhi B. Role of computerized morphometric analysis in diagnosis of effusion specimens. Diag Cytopathol. 2006;34:670–675.
   Google Scholar
• Rout P, Shariff S. Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative variables in thyroid lesions. Cytopathology. 1999;10:171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Dey P. Cancer nucleus: morphology and beyond. Diag Cytopathol. 2010;38:382–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan GR, Hirst LW, Bancroft BJ. The cytomorphology of ocular surface squamous neoplasia by using impression cytology. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol.). 2001;93:60–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirkhah A, Mahbod M, Farzbod F, et al. Repeated applications of impression cytology to increase sensitivity for diagnosis of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Opthalmol. 2012;96:229–233.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Naase T. Nucleus and cell size changes in human bulbar conjunctival cells after soft contact lens wear, as assessed by impression cytology. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2008;31:131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doughty MJ, Blades K, Button NF, Wilson G. Further analysis of the size and shape of cells obtained by impression cytology from the exposed portion of the human bulbar conjunctiva. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2000;20:391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty MJ. On the use of NIH Image J for objective assessment of conjunctival cell and nucleus dimensions of impression cytology samples. Eye Contact Lens. 2011; 37:50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas L, Murube J, Shalaby O, et al. Contribución de la citología de impressión al diagnóstico diferencial del síndrome de Sjögren en la clínica oftalmológica. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2002;77: 63–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tseng S-H, Chen Y-T, Cheng H-C, et al. Impression cytology study of conjunctival epithelial phenotypes on the healing of ocular surface after pterygium excision. Cornea. 2001; 20: 244–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar