REFERENCES
- Haimann MH, Burton TC, Brown CK. Epidemiology of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:289–292.
- Wilkes SR, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Robertson DM, O’Fallon WM. The incidence of retinal detachment in Rochester, Minnesota, 1970-1978. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:670–673.
- Törnquist R, Stenkula S, Törnquist P. Retinal detachment. A study of a population-based patient material in Sweden 1971–1981. I. Epidemiology. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1987;65:213–222.
- Ah-Fat FG, Sharma MC, Majid MA, McGalliard JN, Wong D. Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:396–398.
- Haddad WM, Monin C, Morel C et al. Retinal detachment after phacoemulsification: a study of 114 cases. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:630–638.
- Yoshida A, Ogasawara H, Jalkh AE, Sanders RJ, McMeel JW, Schepens CL. Retinal detachment after cataract surgery. Surgical results. Ophthalmology 1992;99:460–465.
- Ambresin A, Wolfensberger TJ, Bovey EH. Management of giant retinal tears with vitrectomy, internal tamponade, and peripheral 360 degrees retinal photocoagulation. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2003;23:622–628.
- Pastor JC, Fernández I, Rodríguez de la Rú,a E et al. Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project–report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:378–382.
- Feltgen N, Weiss C, Wolf S, Ottenberg D, Heimann H; SPR Study Group. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:803–809.
- Falkner-Radler CI, Myung JS, Moussa S et al. Trends in primary retinal detachment surgery: results of a Bicenter study. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2011;31:928–936.
- Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ, Lin HC. Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9-year nationwide population-based study. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:669–675.
- Arya AV, Emerson JW, Engelbert M, Hagedorn CL, Adelman RA. Surgical management of pseudophakic retinal detachments: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1724–1733.
- Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH; Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2142–2154.
- Lincoff H, Lincoff A, Stopa M. Systematic review of efficacy and safety of surgery for primary retinal detachment. In: Primary Retinal Detachment: Options for Repair. Kreissig I (ed). New York: Springer Verlag 2005 Berlin Heidelberg;2005:161–175.
- Han DP, Rychwalski PJ, Mieler WF, Abrams GW. Management of complex retinal detachment with combined relaxing retinotomy and intravitreal perfluoro-n-octane injection. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:24–32.
- Schaal S, Sherman MP, Barr CC, Kaplan HJ. Primary retinal detachment repair: comparison of 1-year outcomes of four surgical techniques. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 2011;31:1500–1504.
- Stangos AN, Petropoulos IK, Brozou CG, Kapetanios AD, Whatham A, Pournaras CJ. Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:952–958.
- Kinori M, Moisseiev E, Shoshany N et al. Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:291–297.e2.
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.
- SIGN. Sign 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook, Revised edition January 2008 ed: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2008:56–60.
- Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV et al. Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83:293–297.
- Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG, Stangos NT. Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial. Retina (Philadelphia, PA) 2005;25:957–964.
- Azad RV, Chanana B, Sharma YR, Vohra R. Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:540–545.
- Koriyama M, Nishimura T, Matsubara T, Taomoto M, Takahashi K, Matsumura M. Prospective study comparing the effectiveness of scleral buckling to vitreous surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51:360–367.
- Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al.; Pseudophakic and Aphakic Retinal Detachment (PARD) Study Group. Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation–report no. 1. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1421–1429.
- Christensen PM, Kristiansen IS. Number-needed-to-treat (NNT)–needs treatment with care. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006;99:12–16.
- Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088–1101.
- Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–634.
- Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001;20:641–654.
- Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Lecuen N, et al. 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1811–1819.
- Fujii GY, De Juan E Jr, Humayun MS et al. Initial experience using the transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy system for vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1814–1820.
- Albrieux M, Rouberol F, Bernheim D, Romanet JP, Chiquet C. Comparative study of 23-gauge vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1459–1468.
- Gupta OP, Ho AC, Kaiser PK et al. Short-term outcomes of 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:193–197.
- Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, Uchio E, Yanagi Y, Tamaki Y, Araie M. Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:513–515.
- Schocket LS, Witkin AJ, Fujimoto JG et al. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography in patients with decreased visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 2006;113:666–672.
- Lincoff H, Stopa M, Kreissig I et al. Cutting the encircling band. Retina (Philadelphia, PA) 2006;26:650–654.
- Kim YK, Woo SJ, Park KH, Yu YS, Chung H. Comparison of persistent submacular fluid in vitrectomy and scleral buckle surgery for macula-involving retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:623–629.e1.
- Gharbiya M, Grandinetti F, Scavella V, et al. Correlation between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings and visual outcome after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 2012;32:43–53.
- Speicher MA, Fu AD, Martin JP, von Fricken MA. Primary vitrectomy alone for repair of retinal detachments following cataract surgery. Retina (Philadelphia, PA) 2000;20:459–464.
- Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR et al. Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1811–5 ; discussion 1816.