227
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Predicting Postoperative Astigmatism Using Scheimpflug Keratometry (Pentacam) and Automated Keratometry (IOLMaster)

, &
Pages 1091-1098 | Received 10 May 2012, Accepted 06 Jul 2012, Published online: 23 Aug 2012

REFERENCES

  • Nichamin LD. Astigmatism control. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006;19:485–493.
  • Horn JD. Status of toric intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18:58–61.
  • Fam HB, Lim KL. Validity of the keratometric index: large population-based study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:686–691.
  • Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2000;16:349–361.
  • Ho JD, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ et al. Validity of the keratometric index: evaluation by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:137–145.
  • Lowe RF, Clark BA. Posterior corneal curvature. Correlations in normal eyes and in eyes involved with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1973;57:464–470.
  • Dubbelman M, Weeber HA, van der Heijde RG et al. Radius and asphericity of the posterior corneal surface determined by corrected Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:379–383.
  • Edmund C. Posterior corneal curvature and its influence on corneal dioptric power. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1994;72:715–720.
  • Ha BJ, Kim SW, Kim SW et al. Pentacam and Orbscan II measurements of posterior corneal elevation before and after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 2009;25:290–295.
  • Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K et al. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:127–133.
  • Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M et al. Agreement between Pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. J Refract Surg 2009;25:534–538.
  • Eydelman MB, Drum B, Holladay J et al. Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg 2006;22:81–95.
  • Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:80–85.
  • Park CY, Chuck RS, Channa P et al. The effect of corneal anterior surface eccentricity on astigmatism after cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42:408–415.
  • Jin H, Limberger IJ, Ehmer A et al. Impact of axis misalignment of toric intraocular lenses on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:2061–2072.
  • Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Igarashi A et al. Comparison of corneal power, corneal astigmatism, and axis location in normal eyes obtained from an autokeratometer and a corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:648–654.
  • Karabatsas CH, Papaefthymiou I, Aslanides IM et al. Comparison of keratometric and topographic cylinder and axis measurements on normal corneas with low astigmatism. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:8–16.
  • Dunne MC, Royston JM, Barnes DA. Posterior corneal surface toricity and total corneal astigmatism. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:708–710.
  • Prisant O, Hoang-Xuan T, Proano C et al. Vector summation of anterior and posterior corneal topographical astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1636–1643.
  • Ho JD, Tsai CY, Liou SW. Accuracy of corneal astigmatism estimation by neglecting the posterior corneal surface measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:788–95, 795.e1.
  • Oshika T, Kawana K, Hiraoka T et al. Ocular higher-order wavefront aberration caused by major tilting of intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:744–746.
  • Korynta J, Bok J, Cendelin J et al. Computer modeling of visual impairment caused by intraocular lens misalignment. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:100–105.
  • Teus MA, Arruabarrena C, Hernández-Verdejo JL et al. Correlation between keratometric and refractive astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:1671–1675.
  • Newcombe RG, Duff GR. Eyes or patients? Traps for the unwary in the statistical analysis of ophthalmological studies. Br J Ophthalmol 1987;71:645–646.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.