Corneal Biomechanical Property Measurement with an IOP Loading Method in Keratoconic Patients

References

• McMonnes ChW. Intraocular pressure spikes in keratectasia, axial myopia and glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1018–1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui BV, Edmunds B, Cioffi GA, Fortune B. The gradient of retinal function changes during acute intraocular pressure elevation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:202–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranos P, Bhar G, Little B. Postoperative intraocular pressure spikes: the need to treat. Eye 2004;18:673–679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Seong GJ, Hong YJ. Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation and progressive visual field deterioration in patients with glaucoma and low intraocular pressure after a triple procedure. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1010–1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GE, Berlin JA, Young TL, Ziylan S, Stone RA. Association of intraocular pressure and myopia in children. Ophthalmology 1995;102:180–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruett RC. Progressive myopia and intraocular pressure: what is the linkage? A literature review. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1988;185:117–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lapochkin VI. Ophthalmic tone of myopic eyes: statistical evaluation and role in formation of acquired myopia. Vestn Oftalmol 1997;113:20–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen H. Myopia progression in young school children and intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;82:249–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergienko NM, Shargorodska IV. Scleral rigidity of eyes of different refractions. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:1009–1012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Nieto JC, Lopes-Miguel A. Characterization of corneal structure in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:2167–2183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner G, Eilmsteiner R, Steindl Ch, Ruckhofer J, Mattioli R, Husinsky W. Dynemic corneal imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:163–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam AK, Douthwait WA. The effect of an artificially elevated intraocular pressure on the central corneal curvature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997;17:18–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW, Boneham GC. Corneal responses to intraocular pressure elevation in keratoconus. Cornea 2010;29:764–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocacs I, Mihaltz K, Nemeth J, Nagy Z. Anterior chamber characteristics of keratoconus assessed by rotating Scheimpflug imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:1101–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucarhan ÖÖ, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact spectacular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:970–977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emre S, Doganay S, Yologlu S. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with the Pentacam system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1708–1712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalban R, Alio JL, Javaloy J, Pinero DP. Comparative analysis of the relationship between anterior and posterior corneal shape analyzed by Scheimpflug photography 9in normal and keratoconus eyes. Graef Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251:1547–1555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz Y, Maumenee I, Lundergan M, Puffenberger E, Zhu D, Antonarakis S, Francomano C. Molecular genetic analysis in autosomal dominant keratoconus. Cornea 1992;11:302–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips A. Can true monocular keratoconus occur? Clin Exp Opt 2003;86:399–4002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saad A, Ganitel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:5546–5555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klyce SD. Chasing the suspect: keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:845–847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Poillunat LE. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyser software. J Refract Surg 2011;27:452–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz DO, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel FA, Alio JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1371–1375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touboul T, Roberts C, Kerautret J, Garra C, Maurice-Tison S, Saubusse E, Colin J. Correlation between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:616–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S. Evaluation of cornea biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011;21:138–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Nessim M, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartly S, Shah S. Accuracy of Goldmann, Ocular Response Analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1661–1665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr Opion Ophthalmol 2006;17:406–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrosio RJr, Salomao M, Velarde GC, Nose W. Biomechanical and tomographic analysis of unilateral keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2010;26:677–681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergienko NM, Shargorodska IV. Determining corneal hysteresis and preexisting intraocular pressure. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:2033–2034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touboul D, Benard A, Mahmoud AM, Gallois A, Colin J, Roberts SJ. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:2144–2150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosio R, Belin MW. Imaging of cornea:topography vs tomography. J Refract Surg 2010;26:847–849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin MW, Khachikian SS. An introduction to understanding elevation-based topography: how elevation data are displayed- a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;37:14–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Bao F, Feng Y. Assesment of corneal biomechanical behaviour under posterior and anterior pressure. J Refract Surg 2013;29:64–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmund C. Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes: a methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of kerakoconus. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1989;193:93–98
   Google Scholar
• Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1988;66:134–140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler TH. Iartogenic keratectasia: academic anxiety or serious risk? J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1307–1308 (editorial)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod SD, Kisla TA, Caro NC, McMahon TT. Iatrogenic keratoconus: corneal ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:282–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim H, Choi J-S, Joo C-K. Corena ectasia after PRK: clinicopathologic case report. Cornea 2006;25:845–848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas A, Ariza A, Haber A, Fermon S, Velazquez R, Suarez R. Bilateral keratyectasia after phorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 2007;23:941–943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti TB, Ghanem VC, Ghanem RC, Binder PS. Moderate keratoconus with thick corneas. J Refract Surg 2013;29:430–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar