Regional Variations in Correlation between Photopic Negative Response of Focal Electoretinograms and Ganglion Cell Complex in Glaucoma

References

• Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL 3rd, Barnes G, Holt WF, Crawford MLJ. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3152–3160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL 3rd, Crawford MLJ. Scaling the structure-function relationship for clinical perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83:448–255
   Google Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Quigley HA. Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:853–859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan O, Chopra V, Lu AT, Schuman JS, Ishikawa H, Wollstein G, et al. Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2305–2314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho JW, Sung KR, Lee S, Yun SC, Kang SY, Choi J, et al. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6401–6407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na JH, Kook MS, Lee Y, Baek S. Structure-function relationship of the macular visual field sensitivity and the ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:5044–5051
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1124–1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walter JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:514–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y. Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:341–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, Schiffman JS, Bahrani HM, Tang RA. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacological blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3827–3837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Gotoh Y, Tanaka M, Tazawa Y. Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:938–940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizawa J, Machida S, Kobayashi T, Gotoh Y, Kurosaka D. Changes of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with early diabetic retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006;50:367–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno S, Kondo M, Piao CH, Ikenoya K, Miyake Y, Terasaki H. Selective amplitude reduction of the PhNR after macular hole surgery: ganglion cell damage related to ICG-assisted ILM peeling and gas tamponade. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3545–3549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M, Lin J, Ueno S, Miyake Y, et al. Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:820–824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Gotoh Y, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:2201–2207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Cheng H, Hu YS, Tang RA, Frishman LJ. The photopic negative response of the flash electoretinogram in multiple sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:1315–1323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyake Y, Yanagida K, Kondo K, Ota I. Subjective scotometry and recording of local electroretinogram and visual evoked response. System with television monitor of the fundus. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1981;25:438–448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake Y. Studies on local macular ERG. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn 1988;92:1419–1449
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machida S, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:5636–5644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Tamada K, Oikawa T, Yokoyama D, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Sensitivity and specificity of photopic negative response of focal electroretinogram to detect glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:202–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machida S. Clinical application of photopic negative response to optic nerve and retinal diseases. J Ophthalmol 2012;397178
   Google Scholar
• Tamada K, Machida S, Oikawa T, Miyamoto H, Nishimura T, Kurosaka D. Correlation between photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms and local loss of retinal neurons in glaucoma. Curr Eye Res 2010;35:155–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Hangai M, Mori S, Hirose F, Yoshimura N. Hemispherical focal macular photopic negative response and macular inner retinal thickness in open angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:494–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko M, Machida S, Hoshi Y, Kurosaka D. Alternations of photopic negative response of multifocal electoretinogram in patients with glaucoma. Curr Eye Res, in press
   Google Scholar
• Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated static perimetry, 2nd edition. St Louis: Mosby; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Miyake Y, Shiroyama N, Horiguchi M, Ota I. Asymmetry of focal ERG in human macular region. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:1743–1749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE, Miyake Y, Brigell M, Bach M. ISCEV standard for full-field clinical electoretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 2009;118:69–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo M, Kurimoto Y, Sakai T, Koyasu T, Miyata K, Ueno S, et al. Recording focal macular photopic negative response (PhNR) from monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3544–3550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peichl L, Wässle H. Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centers in the cat retina. J Physiol 1979;291:117–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasado N. Receptive field densities of the ganglion cells of the human retina. Vision Res 1989;29:985–988
   Google Scholar
• Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi M, Suzuki S, Tanikawa A. Recording multifocal elecoretinogram on and off responses in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:574–580
   Google Scholar
• Nagata M. Studies of the photopic ERG of the human retina. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1963;7:96–124
   Google Scholar
• Bui BV, Fortune B. Ganglion cell contribution to the rat full-field electoretinogram. J Physiol 2004;555:153–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Raz-Prag D, Fariss RN, Sieving PA, Bush RA. Photopic ERG negative response from amacrine cell signaling in RCS rat retinal degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:442–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringmann A, Pannicke T, Grosche J, Francke M, Wiedemann P, Skatchkov SN, et al. Müller cells in the healthy and diseased retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:397–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar