Corneal Biomechanical Comparison of Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome, Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma and Healthy Subjects

REFERENCES

• Thorleifsson G, Magnusson KP, Sulem P, Walters GB, Gudbjartsson H, Stefansson H, et al. Common sequence variants in the LOXL1 gene confer susceptibility to exfoliation glaucoma. Science 2007;317:1397–1400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO. Ocular and systemic pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:921–937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotzer-Schrehardt UM, Koca MR, Naumann GO, Volkholz H. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ocular manifestation of a systemic disorder? Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1752–1756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeten BW, Li ZY, Wallace RN, Eagle RC Jr, Keshgegian AA. Pseudoexfoliative fibrillopathy in visceral organs of a patient with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1757–1762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kuchle M, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Kaiser A, Kirchner T. Latent TGF-beta 1 binding protein (LTBP-1); a new marker for intra-and extraocular PEX deposits. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2000;216:412–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat S. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: an identifiable cause of open angle glaucoma. KJO 2010;22:330–335
   Google Scholar
• Ritch R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:265–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Küchle M, Dörfler S, Naumann GOH. Corneal endothelial involvement in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:666–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake K, Matsuda M, Inaba M. Corneal endothelial changes in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:49–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks AM, Grant G, Robertson IF, Gillies WE. Progressive corneal endothelial cell changes in anterior segment disease. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 1987;15:71–78
   Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Inoue Y, Shiraishi A, Hara Y, Goto T, Ohashi Y. In vivo confocal microscopic and histological findings of unknown bullous keratopathy probably associated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012;12:17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjortdal JO, Jensen PK. Extensibility of the normo-hydrated human cornea. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995;73:12–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Voogd S, Ikram MK, Wolfs RC, Jansonius NM, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, de Jong FH. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma? Ophthalmology 2006;113:1827–1831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan-Mee M, Billingsley SC, Patel AD, Halverson KD, Alldredge BR, Qualls C. Ocular response analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:463–470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chihara E. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data. Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53:203–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:109–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5337--5347
   Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry JC, Krupin T, Schmitt M, Lauffer J, Miller E, Ewing MQ et al. Long-term: follow up of pseudoexfolialion and the development of elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology 1997;94:545--550
   Google Scholar
• Konstm ACP. Glaucoma in eyes with exfoliation syndrome. 3rd International Glaucoma Syposium – ICS. Prague, Czech Republic, March 21–25, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Martone G, Casprini F, Traversi C, Lepri F, Pichierri P, Caporossi A. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: in vivo confocal microscopy analysis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;35:582–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French DD, Margo CE, Harman LE. Ocular pseudoexfoliation and cardiovascular disease : a national cross-section comparison study. N Am J Med Sci 2012;4:468–473
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demir N, Ulus T, Yucel OE, Kumral ET, Singar E, Tanboga HI. Assessment of myocardial ischaemia using tissue Doppler imaging in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:1177–1180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrum KR, Hattenhauer MG, Hodge D. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality associated with ocular pseudoexfoliation. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:83–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cankaya AB, Anayol A, Özcelik D, Demirdogen E, Yilmazbas P. Ocular response analyzer to assess corneal biomechanical properties in exfoliation syndrome and exfoliative glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:255–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenerel NM, Gorgun E, Kucumen RB, Oral D, Dinc UA, Ciftci F. Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Cornea 2011;30:983–986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue K, Okugawa K, Oshika T, Amano S. Morphological study of corneal endothelium and corneal thickness in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003;47:235–239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala M. Corneal hysteresis in normal subjects and in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res 2011;46:187–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbeity Z, Palmiero PM, Tello C, et al. Non-contact in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in exfoliation syndrome, exfoliation syndrome suspect and normal eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:241–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao A. Normotensive pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: a new phenotype? Semin Ophthalmol 2012;27:48–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effects of aging on corneal biomechanical properties and their impact on 24-hour measurement of intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:567–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar