Pressure Difference Between the Anterior Chamber and the Vitreous Cavity in Eyes with Pupillary Block

References

• Kiel JW, Hollingsworth M, Rao R, Chen M, Reitsamer HA. Ciliary blood flow and aqueous humor production. Prog Retin Eye Res 2011;30:1–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana ST, Brubaker RF. Volume and depth of the anterior chamber of the normal aging human eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:1803–1808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver DM, Quiqley HA. Aqueous humor through iris–lens channel: estimates of differential pressure between the anterior and posterior chambers. J Glaucoma 2004;13:100–107
   Google Scholar
• Chandler PA. Narrow-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1952;47:695–716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hey JJ, Barocas VH, Taravella MJ. Modeling passive mechanical interaction between aqueous humor and iris. J Biomech Eng 2001;123:540–547
   Google Scholar
• Jackson TL, Thiagarajan M, Murthy R, Snead MP, Wong D, Williamson TH. Pupil block glaucoma in phakic and pseudophakic patients after vitrectomy with silicone oil injection. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:414–416
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shahwan S, Ghadhfan F, Kalantan H, Al-Torbak AA. Pupillary block glaucoma in phakic perfluoropropane gas filled eye. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:797–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieser DK, Wilensky JT. Laser iridectomy in the management of chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:446–450
   Google Scholar
• Airaksinen PJ, Saari KM, Tiainen TJ, Jaanio EA. Management of acute closed-angle glaucoma with miotics and timolol. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:822–825
   Google Scholar
• Ganias F, Mapstone R. Miotics in closed-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1975;59:205–206
   Google Scholar
• Lam DS, Chua JK, Tham CC, Lai JS. Efficacy and safety of immediate anterior chamber paracentesis in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a pilot study. Ophthalmology 2002;109:64–70
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Verdejo JL, Teus MA, Bolivar G. Simultaneous measurement of intraocular pressure in the anterior chamber and the vitreous cavity. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:e265–e268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John SW, Hagaman JR, MacTaggart TE, Peng L, Smithes O. Intraocular pressure in inbred mouse strains. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:249–253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohan BE, Bohr DF. Goldmann applanation tonometry in the conscious rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:340–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore CG, Milne ST, Morrison JC. Noninvasive measurement of rat intraocular pressure with the Tono–Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:363–369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitsamer HA, Kiel JW, Harrison JM, Ransom NL, McKinnon SJ. Tonopen measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:799–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CY, Kuehn MH, Anderson MG, Kwon YH. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry. Eye (Lond) 2007;21:1202–1209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldblum D, Kontiola AI, Mittag T, Chen B, Danias J. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (Tonopen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:942–946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre MM, Stein RA, Hassanein K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:592–596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:34–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 2008;115:80–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao A, Kumar M, B P, Varshney G. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer. J Glaucoma 2012 Dec 3. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP. The effect of thin, thick and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction fomulae in individual eyes. Ophthalmology 2012;119:443–449
   Google Scholar
• Danias J, Kontiola AI, Filippopoulos T, Mittag T. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1138–1141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis H, Han D, Williams GA. Management of fibrin pupillary-block glaucoma after pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal gas injection. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;103:180–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett WH II. Dislocation of the lens. A study of 166 hospitalized cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1967;78:289–296
   Google Scholar
• Louis AB. How things work: the physics of everyday life. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino H, Seki M, Ueda J, Yoshino T, Fukuchi T, Abe H. Fibrin membrane pupillary-block glaucoma after uneventful cataract surgery treated with intracameral tissue plasminogen activator: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol 2012;12:3
   Google Scholar
• Pierscionek BK, Asejczyk-Widlicka M, Schachar RA. The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:801–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ytteborg J. Further investigations of factors influencing size of rigidity coefficient. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1960;38:643–657
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woo SL, Kobayashi AS, Schlegel WA, Lawrence C. Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera. Exp Eye Res 1972;14:29–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant WM. Facility of flow through the trabecular meshwork. AMA Arch Ophthalmol 1955;54:245–258
   Google Scholar
• Sugiura Y, Okamoto F, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Intraocular pressure fluctuation during microincision vitrectomy with constellation vision system. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:941–947
   Google Scholar