Kinetics of Competitive Adsorption between Lysozyme and Lactoferrin on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses and the Effect on Lysozyme Activity

References

• Janatova J. Activation and control of complement, inflammation, and infection associated with the use of biomedical polymers. ASAIO J 2000;46:S53–S62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ. Contact lenses 2012. Contact Lens Spectr 2013;28:24–29
   Google Scholar
• Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannucci LL, Moro F, Cosani A, Palumbo M. Conformational state of lacrimal proteins adsorbed on contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 1985;4:734–736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Refojo MF, Holly FJ. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: a possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Intraocular Lens Med J 1977;3:23–36
   Google Scholar
• Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of Hema contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937–941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;22:53–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elhers WH, Donshik PC. Giant papillary conjunctivitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;8:445–449
   Google Scholar
• Hart DE, Schkolnick JA, Bernstein S, Wallach D, Gross DF. Contact lens induced giant papillary conjunctivitis: a retrospective study. J Am Optom Assoc 1989;60:195–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allansmith MR, Korb DR, Greiner JV, Henriquez AS, Simon MA, Finnemore VM. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. Am Acad Ophthalmol 1977;83:697–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welle A. Competitive plasma protein adsorption on modified polymer surfaces monitored by quartz crystal microbalance technique. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2004;15:357–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Jones LW, Chan J, Dalton K. Quartz crystal microbalance study of protein adsorption kinetics on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Colloid Interface Sci 2008;325:157–164
   Google Scholar
• Green RJ, Frazier RA, Shakesheff KM, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJ. Surface plasmon resonance analysis of dynamic biological interactions with biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:1823–1835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RJ, Davies J, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJ. Surface plasmon resonance for real time in situ analysis of protein adsorption to polymer surfaces. Biomaterials 1997;18:405–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora MF, Wehmeyer JL, Synowicki R, Garcia, CD. Investigating Protein Adsorption via Spectroscopic Ellipsometry. In: Puleo DA, Bizios R, editors. Biological Interactions on Materials Surfaces. Springer New York; 2009. pp. 19--41
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth K, Brecht A, Gauglitz G. Studies on the biotin-avidin multilayer adsorption by spectroscopic ellipsometry. J Colloid Interface Sci 1997;196:128–135
   Google Scholar
• Cullen DC, Lowe CR. AFM studies of protein adsorption: 1. Time-resolved protein adsorption to highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. J Colloid Interface Sci 1994;166:102–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:71–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Jones L. Kinetics of lysozyme activity recovered from conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010;21:343–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:119–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo EJ, Koenig JL, Anderson JM, Kliment CK, Lo J. Surface analysis of biomedical polymers by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infra-red. Biomaterials 1984;5:186–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN, Senchyna M, Jones L. A solid-phase assay for the quantitation of total protein eluted from balafilcon, lotrafilcon, and etafilcon contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2008;33:631–640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B, Jones L, Forrest JA. Measuring the kinetics and activity of adsorbed proteins: In vitro lysozyme deposited onto hydrogel contact lenses over short time periods. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2013;101A:755–764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:169–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Z, Wei X, Aliwarga Y, Carnt NA, Garrett Q, Willcox MDP. Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2008;14:2016–2024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichroeb JH, Forrest JA, Ngai V, Martin JW, Jones L, Medley J. Imaging protein deposits on contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1151–1164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin ST, Mandell RB, Leahy CD, Newell JO. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991;17:44–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier M-A, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75–S79; discussion S83–S84, S192–S194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang S, Borazjani RN, Salamone JC, Ahearn DG, Crow Jr SA, Pierce GE. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: Effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2005;28:113–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng XM, Castillo EJ, Anderson JM. Surface modification of soft contact lenses: Silanization, wettability and lysozyme adsorption studies. Biomaterials 1986;7:247–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787–796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsky P. Turbidimetric determination of lysozyme with Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells: reexamination of reaction conditions. Anal Biochem 1983;128:77–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantrappen G, Ghoos AY, Peeters T. The inhibition of lysozyme by bile acids. Am J Dig Dis 1976;21:547–552
   Google Scholar
• Ito Y, Yamada H, Nakamura S, Imoto T. Purification, amino acid sequence, and some properties of rabbit kidney lysozyme. J Biochem 1990;107:236–241
   Google Scholar
• Green-Church KB, Nichols JJ. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition. Mol Vis 2008;14:291–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Synergic antistaphylococcal properties of lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Med Microbiol 1998;47:837–842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch EC, Willcox MD. Lactoferrin increases the susceptibility of S. epidermidis biofilms to lysozyme and vancomycin. Curr Eye Res 1999;19:12–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison RT, Giehl TJ. Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Clin Invest 1991;88:1080–1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceska M, Sjodin AV, Grossmuller F. Some quantitative aspects of the labelling of proteins with 125I by the iodine monochloride method. Biochem J 1971;121:139–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weathersby PK, Horbett TA, Hoffman AS. A new method for analysis of the adsorbed plasma protein layer on biomaterial surfaces. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976;22:242–252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Messina GML, Satriano C, Marletta G. A multitechnique study of preferential protein adsorption on hydrophobic and hydrophilic plasma-modified polymer surfaces. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009;70:76–83
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey BW, Fenstermaker CA. Conformation of adsorbed gamma-globulin and beta-lactoglobulin. Effect of surface concentration. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976;22:278–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fullard RJ, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1119–1126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney FP, Morris CA, Milthorpe B, Flanagan JL, Willcox MDP. In vitro adsorption of tear proteins to hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2009;35:320–328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, Royce FH. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988;29:362–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng A, Heynen M, Luensmann D, Jones L. Impact of tear film components on lysozyme deposition to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:392–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadi S, Heynen M, Luensmann D, Jones L. Composition of incubation solution impacts in vitro protein uptake to silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Mol Vis 2012;18:337–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Glasier M-A, Varikooty J, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Protein deposition and clinical symptoms in daily wear of etafilcon lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1450–1459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams TJ, Schneider RP, Willcox MDP. The effect of protein-coated contact lenses on the adhesion and viability of gram negative bacteria. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:227–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L, Borazjani R, Zhu H, Zhao Z, Jones L, Willcox MDP. Influence of protein deposition on bacterial adhesion to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:959–966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira ME, Oliveira R, Vilar EY, et al. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2007;30:183–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sariri R, Tighe B. Effect of surface chemistry on protein interaction with hydrogel contact lenses. Iran Polym J 1996;5:259–266
   Google Scholar
• Luensmann D, Zhang F, Subbaraman L, Sheardown H, Jones L. Localization of lysozyme sorption to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lenses using confocal microscopy. Curr Eye Res 2009;34:683–697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luensmann D, Glasier M-AA, Zhang F, Bantseev V, Simpson T, Jones L. Confocal microscopy and albumin penetration into contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:839–847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar