Reliability and Intersession Agreement of Microperimetric and Fixation Measurements Obtained with a New Microperimeter in Normal Eyes

REFERENCES

• Rohrschneider K, Bültmann S, Springer C. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res 2008;27:536–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz SN, Reyes SV. Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:350–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midena E, Radin PP, Convento E, Cavarzeran F. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE, Rohrschneider K. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 2005;112:848–854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acton JH, Greenstein VC. Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:358–363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawa M, Gomi F, Toyoda A, Ikuno Y, Fujikado T, Tano Y. A microperimeter that provides fixation pattern and retinal sensitivity measurement. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006;50:111–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrschneider K, Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE. Microperimetry –comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope –fundus perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:125–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima VC, Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Kim J, Seiple W, Rosen RB, et al. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:64–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midena E, Radin PP, Pilotto E, Ghirlando A, Convento E, Varano M. Fixation pattern and macular sensitivity in eyes with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. A microperimetry study. Semin Ophthalmol 2004;19:55–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Midena E, Vujosevic S. Microperimetry in diabetic retinopathy. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011;25:131–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen FK, Patel PJ, Xing W, Bunce C, Egan C, Tufail AT, et al. Test–retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:3464–3472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FK, Patel PJ, Xing W, Crossland MD, Bunce C, Rubin GS, et al. Intrasession repeatability of fixation stability assessment with the Nidek MP-1. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:742–750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Engel SA, Legge GE. The preferred retinal locus in macular disease: toward a consensus definition. Retina 2011;31:2109–2114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard RA. Preferred retinal loci and macular scotoma characteristics in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 2005;40:303–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz SN, Aleykina N. The relationship between scotoma displacement and preferred retinal loci in low-vision patients with age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol 2010;45:58–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarita-Nistor L, Brent MH, Steinbach MJ, González EG. Fixation stability during binocular viewing in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:1887–1893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz SN. Principles of modern low vision rehabilitation. Can J Ophthalmol 2006;41:289–312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarita-Nistor L, González EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ. Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the mp-1 microperimeter. Retina 2008;28:125–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarita-Nistor L, González EG, Markowitz SN, Steinbach MJ. Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss. Vis Neurosci 2009;26:487–494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujosevic S, Smolek MK, Lebow KA, Notaroberto N, Pallikaris A, Casciano M. Detection of macular function changes in early (AREDS 2) and intermediate (AREDS 3) age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2011;225:155–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1983;21:709–772
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seiple W, Rosen RB, Castro-Lima V, Garcia PM. The physics and psychophysics of microperimetry. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:1182–1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midena E, Vujosevic S, Cavarzeran F, Microperimetry Study Group. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the microperimeter MP1. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1571–1576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingessel B, Sacu S, Vécsei-Marlovits PV, Weingessel A, Richter-Mueksch S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of the microperimeter MP-1. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1052–1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasakis A, McAnany JJ, Fishman GA, Seiple WH. Clinical value, normative retinal sensitivity values, and intrasession repeatability using a combined spectral domain optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimeter. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:245–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Costa L, Ibáñez MV, Murcia-Bello C, Epifanio I, Verdejo-Gimeno C, Beltrán-Catalán E, et al. Use of microperimetry to evaluate hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine retinal toxicity. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:400–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T, Tenkumo K, Nitta E, Shiraga F. Correlation between the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness measured with cirrus HD-OCT and macular visual field sensitivity measured with microperimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:3046–3051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhin E, Convento E, Pilotto E, Bonin G, Vujosevic S, Kotsafti O, et al. Static and dynamic retinal fixation stability in Microperimetry. Can J Ophthalmol 2013;48:375–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger RP, Charbel Issa P, Fimmers R, Holz FG, Rubin GS, Scholl HP. Reading performance is reduced by parafoveal scotomas in patients with macular telangiectasia type 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:1366–1370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acton JH, Bartlett NS, Greenstein VC. Comparing the Nidek MP-1 and Humphrey field analyzer in normal subjects. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:1288–1297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland MD, Dunbar HM, Rubin GS. Fixation stability measurement using the MP1 microperimeter. Retina 2009;29:651–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar