Straylight and Visual Quality on Early Nuclear and Posterior Subcapsular Cataracts

References

• Chua BE, Mitchell P, Cumming RG. Effects of cataract type and location on visual function: the blue mountains eye study. Eye 2004;18(8):765–772. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shandiz JH, Derakhshan A, Daneshyar A, et al. Effect of cataract type and severity on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2011;6(1):26–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yong, C, Xuan, S, Xiao-guang, C, Xiao-xin, L, Yong-zhen, B. Correlation between contrast sensitivity and the lens opacities classification system III in age-related nuclear and cortical cataracts. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;126(8):1430–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, Gilchrist J, Whitaker D. Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 1989;9(1):25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datiles MB, Magno BV, Freidlin V. Study of nuclear cataract progression using the National Eye Institute Scheimpflug system. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79(6):527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal DS, Grewal SPS. Clinical applications of Scheimpflug imaging in cataract surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2012;26(1):25–32. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.11.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valbon BF, Alves MR, Ambrósio R Jr. Correlations of straylight, aberrometry, and lens scattering in cataract patients. Rev Bras Oftalmol 2013;72(4):244–248. doi:10.1590/S0034-72802013000400007.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott DB, Hurst MA. Assessing the effect of cataract: a clinical evaluation of the opacity lensmeter 701. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom 1989;66(5):257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke MP, Pearson JC, Vernon SA, Matthews JC. Influence of pupil size on measurements made with the lens opacity meter 701. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74(9):526–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall NF, Lempert P, Shier RP, Zakir R, Phillips D. Grading nuclear cataract: reproducibility and validity of a new method. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83(10):1159–1163. doi:10.1136/bjo.83.10.1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111(6):831–836.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg TJ. Light scattering by donor lenses as a function of depth and wavelength. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38(7):1321–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg TJTP, Spekreijse H. Light scattering model for donor lenses as a function of depth. Vision Res 1999;39(8):1437–1445. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00220-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waard PW, IJspeert JK, Van Den Berg TJ, De Jong PT. Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33(3):618–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franssen L, Coppens JE, van den Berg TJTP. Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(2):768–776. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijn LJ van, Nischler C, Gamer D, et al. Measurement of stray light and glare: comparison of Nyktotest, Mesotest, stray light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89(3):345–351. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.044990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly WJ III, Pesudovs K, Marsack JD, Sarver EJ, Applegate RA. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg 2003;20(5): S515–22. Thorofare NJ 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerviño A, Bansal D, Hosking SL, Montés-Micó R. Objective measurement of intraocular forward light scatter using Hartmann-Shack spot patterns from clinical aberrometers: model-eye and human-eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(7):1089–1095. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott DB. Assessment of patients with age-related cataract. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom 1998;18( Suppl 2):S51–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stifter E, Sacu S, Thaler A, Weghaupt H. Contrast acuity in cataracts of different morphology and association to self-reported visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(12):5412–5422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaria J, Artal P, Bescós J. Determination of the point-spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical-digital method. J Opt Soc Am 1987;4(6):1109–1114. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.4.001109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artal P, Benito A, Pérez GM, et al. An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts. PloS One 2011;6(2): e16823. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Ortiz D, Alio JL. Ocular scattering. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom 2010;87(9):E682–696. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e87da6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van den Berg TJ. Problem of double pass recording using infrared light. Clin Exp Optom 2011;94(4):393–393. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00633.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilaseca M, Romero MJ, Arjona M, et al. Grading nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts using an objective scatter index measured with a double-pass system. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(9):1204–1210. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre Polo M, Others. Cambios en los parámetros de calidad óptica ocular proporcionados por OQAS entre población sana y adulta; 2011. Accessed September 4, 2015 from http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099.1/11399.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC, et al. Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population. Clin Exp Optom J Aust Optom Assoc 2011;94(2):223–229. doi:10.1111/j.1444–0938.2010.00535.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg TJTPVD. Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability. Doc Ophthalmol 1986;61(3–4):327–333. doi:10.1007/BF00142360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo E, Issolio L, Santillan JS, Aguirre R. What characteristics a clinical CSF system has to have? Opt Appl 2009;39(2):415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown NA. The morphology of cataract and visual performance. Eye Lond Engl 1993;7(1):63–67. doi:10.1038/eye.1993.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correlation sample size. Sample Size Calc. Accessed September 4 from 2015.http://www.sample-size.net/correlation-sample-size/.
   Google Scholar
• Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach (4th ed.), 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Maraini G, Rosmini F, Graziosi P, et al. Influence of type and severity of pure forms of age-related cataract on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Italian American Cataract Study Group. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35(1):262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan A-P, Wang Q-M, Huang F, Huang J-H, Bao F-J, Yu A-Y. Correlation among lens opacities classification system III grading, visual function index-14, pentacam nucleus staging, and objective scatter index for cataract assessment. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159(2):241–247.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima A, Shimizu K, Kobashi H, Saito A, Kamiya K. Repeatability, reproducibility, and comparability of subjective and objective measurements of intraocular forward scattering in healthy subjects. BioMed Res Int 2015;2015. Accessed September 4, 2015 from http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/925217/abs/. Accessed September 4, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cabot F, Saad A, McAlinden C, Haddad NM, Grise-Dulac A, Gatinel D. Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155(4):629–635.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SA, Hwang J, Hwang K-Y, Chung S-H. Objective assessment of nuclear cataract: comparison of double-pass and Scheimpflug systems. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40(5):716–721. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan AC, Loon SC, Choi H, Thean L. Lens opacities classification system III: cataract grading variability between junior and senior staff at a Singapore hospital. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(11):1948–1952. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeimer RC, Noth JM. A new method of measuring in vivo the lens transmittance, and study of lens scatter, fluorescence and transmittance. Ophthalmic Res 1984;16(5):246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Chylack L, White O. Topcon SL-45 photography, a suitable technique for documenting nuclear but not cortical cataractous change in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Suppl 1985;26:119.
   Google Scholar
• Brown NAP, Bron AJ, Ayliffe W, Sparrow J, Hill AR. The objective assessment of cataract. Eye 1987;1(2):234–246. doi:10.1038/eye.1987.43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison JA, Chylack LT Jr. Clinical application of the lens opacities classification system III in the performance of phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29(1):138–145. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01839-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencić G, Zorić-Geber M, Sarić D, Corak M, Mandić Z. Clinical importance of the lens opacities classification system III (LOCS III) in phacoemulsification. Coll Antropol 2005;29( Suppl 1):91–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chikamoto N, Fujitsu Y, Kimura K, Nishida T, Araki T. Device for cataract analysis: development and relevance to cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36(1):58–65. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.06.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Ram J, Jain A, Sukhija J, Chaudhary M. Correlation of nuclear density using the lens opacity classification system III versus Scheimpflug imaging with phacoemulsification parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39(12):1818–1823. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan ACS, Wang JJ, Lamoureux EL, et al. Cataract prevalence varies substantially with assessment systems: comparison of clinical and photographic grading in a population-based study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011;18(4):164–170. doi:10.3109/09286586.2011.594205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar