Topography, Wettability, and Electrostatic Charge Consist Major Surface Properties of Intraocular Lenses

References

• Kook D, Kampik A, Dexl AK, Zimmermann N, Glasser A, Baumeister M et al. Advances in lens implant technology. F1000 Med Rep 2013;5:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanavaty MA, Spalton DJ, Boyce JF. Influence of different acrylic intraocular lens materials on optical quality of vision in pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(7):1230–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama Y, Kobayakawa S, Yanagawa H, Tochikubo T. The relationship between the adhesion characteristics of acrylic intraocular lens materials and posterior capsule opacification. Ophthalmic Res. 2007;39(5):276–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Shigeta M, Yamakawa N, Usui M. Cell adhesion to acrylic intraocular lens associated with lens surface properties. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(8):1648–1651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardo M, Carbone G, Lombardo G, De Santo MP, Barberi R. Analysis of intraocular lens surface properties with atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(8):1378–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardo M, Talu S, Talu M, Serrao S, Ducoli P. Surface roughness of intraocular lenses with different dioptric powers assessed by atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36(9):1573–1578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee R, Chaudhury K, Das S, Sengupta S, Biswas P. Posterior capsular opacification and intraocular lens surface micro-roughness characteristics: an atomic force microscopy study. Micron. 2012;43(9):937–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrani M, Dick HB, Wolters B, Pakula T, Wolf E. Material properties of various intraocular lenses in an experimental study. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218(1):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasavada AR, Raj SM, Shah A, Shah G, Vasavada V. Comparison of posterior capsule opacification with hydrophobic acrylic and hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(6):1050–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG. Surface cytologic features on intraocular lenses: can increased biocompatibility have disadvantages? Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(7):872–878.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan GY, Hughes TC, McLean KM, McFarland GA, Nguyen X, Wilkie JS, Johnson G. Approaches to improving the biocompatibility of porous perfluoropolyethers for ophthalmic applications. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8):1287–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MJ, Baron T. Amplitude-mode electrostatic force microscopy in UHV: Quantification of nanocrystal charge storage. Physical Review B. 2005;72(16):165420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Kil JK. Hydrophilic property by contact angle change of ion implanted polycarbonate. Rev Sci Instrum. 2008; 79 (2 Pt 2): 2C–508C.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder AC, Lingenfelder C, Seitz B, Grabowy U, W Spraul C, Gatzioufas Z et al. Impact of fibronectin on surface properties of intraocular lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(9):1277–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Chanloy C, Bostvironnois V, Pellon G, Mari E et al. In vivo study of bacterial adhesion to five types of intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(12):3717–3121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findl O, Menapace R, Sacu S, Buehl W, Rainer G. Effect of optic material on posterior capsule opacification in intraocular lenses with sharp-edge optics: randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(1):67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner L, Pandey SK, Apple DJ, Escobar-Gomez M, McLendon L, Macky TA. Anterior capsule opacification: correlation of pathologic findings with clinical sequelae. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(9):1675–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardo M, Carbone G, Lombardo G, De Santo MP, Barberi R. Analysis of intraocular lens surface adhesiveness by atomic force microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(7):1266–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano A, Busin M, Spitznas M. Bacterial growth is significantly enhanced on foldable intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(8):1015–1016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schauersberger J, Amon M, Aichinger D, Georgopoulos A. Bacterial adhesion to rigid and foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses: in vitro study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(2):361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endophthalmitis Study Group, European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons. Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: results of the ESCRS multicenter study and identification of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(6):978–88.
   Google Scholar
• Khorasani MT, Moemenbellah S, Mirzadeh H, Sadatnia B. Effect of surface charge and hydrophobicity of polyurethanes and silicone rubbers on L929 cells response. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2006;51(2):112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies NP, Rassam SR, Shah SM. Measurement of electrostatic charge on intraocular lenses. Eye (Lond) 1998;12 ( Pt 3a):449–452.
   Google Scholar
• Thian ES, Ahmad Z, Huang J, Edirisinghe MJ, Jayasinghe SN, Ireland DC et al. The role of surface wettability and surface charge of electrosprayed nanoapatites on the behaviour of osteoblasts. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(3):750–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Powell CH. Uptake and release phenomena in contact lens care by silicone hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2013;39(1):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhital A, Spalton DJ, Goyal S, Werner L. Calcification in hydrophilic intraocular lenses associated with injection of intraocular gas. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(6):1154–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple DJ, Peng Q, Arthur SN, Werner L, Merritt JH, Vargas LG et al. Snowflake degeneration of polymethyl methacrylate posterior chamber intraocular lens optic material: a newly described clinical condition caused by unexpected late opacification of polymethyl methacrylate. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(9):1666–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar